Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

One reason why all aircraft should include passenger parchutes

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭diverdriver


    The absolute minimum for to bail out with a normal parachute is around 1000' to 1500'. For a tandem it's higher recommended for 4000' to 5000'. If the Tandem instructor deploys the reserve it could be a bit lower. It would want to be a really bad emergency to bail out that low.

    So to say the skydivers had 'seconds' to bail out is an exaggeration. In any case the word is that they were quite high when the engine quit. So they had plenty of time. The pilot most likely had a parachute too. Generally they would only use it in the event of a structural failure or fire.

    The pilot was unlucky not to make it back into the field.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭Pataman


    The pilot most likely had a parachute too.

    Is this the norm for parachute planes?
    I never heard of it before.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭diverdriver


    Pretty much the norm although almost essential in smaller jump aircraft where the possibility of a parachute getting hung up on the tail is greater. It doesn't happen that often and even then the aircraft can remain flyable.

    It's rare for pilots to take to the chute, in any case simply getting out of the pilot's seat would be a problem. Unless it's something drastic most prefer to fly the thing to the ground. Jumping too low is more dangerous than a crash landing.:eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    What about the elderly and infirm ? How they gonna land :D


    with a bump no doubt


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    Shouldn't be up there.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Wait for it... someone'll mention putting ejection seats in 737s next :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭View Profile


    Interesting thread about this already in AH>:rolleyes:

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055514170


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭diverdriver


    That's a funny thread on after hours. People are incredibly ignorant about flying. Even most people travel on aircraft all the time.:confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 709 ✭✭✭tracker-man


    A chute for the aircraft itself my be less awkward and overall better!
    cirrus-741265.jpg


Advertisement