Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Unusal stone - worthless?

  • 05-02-2009 8:30pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 312 ✭✭


    Sorry I dont think this would come under the archaelogy section but its the closest I could find.
    My cousin found this stone somewhere in northern France, Ive had this stone for years but its probably worthless. I would like opinions from the learned people here.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭Doozie


    Is it worked, as in have the edges of the stone been chipped away to form a sharp edge?
    I dont know much about paleolithic artefacts from France and this doesn't look like a hand axe or anything. Could it just be a naturally formed material? If the edges look deliberately worked then it could have been a tool. This of course is highly speculative.

    Also, to your question is it worth anything? Are you thinking of presenting it to the museum in the hope they offer you a vast fortune?
    If so....I would stop hoping. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 Millucc


    Take another two photo's...

    1) with a ruler alongside, for scale...

    2) from the 'side', to let us see the depth/thickness...

    It 'looks' like a flint 'thumbnail scraper'.

    The edges 'could' be worked, but also could be natural. Need to see them closer up. The middle 'gap' looks like natural erosion. What's interesting is the 'bulge' below that. This could be what is called the 'bulb of percussion', from when it was first struck off a flint core.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 312 ✭✭Cuchulain


    I'd be surprised if work was done it, although looking at the edges it does look very clean. Also the edge of the cut doesnt seem very eroded so it looks like the stone was broken "open" recent to its find.

    My wording of "worthless" might be misleading, its been sitting in my drawer for the last decade before I lob it over the ditch I though maybe somebody could have a look at it, as its always been in the back of my mind because of its unusual appearance.

    Thanks for the replies anyway, here are some more pics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 Millucc


    Well, I wasn't expecting the other side to look like that!

    Bad news is, its not what I first thought. And its not flint. Looks like it could be a natural, sea stone, smoothed by wave action and split in half at some point. But geology isn't my strong point.

    You might want to ask in a geology forum for more detail about the stone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


    This is a natural stone. I think it's formed by lava balls cooling. Can't remember the name, will try to get it or ring my geologist brother-in-law.

    edit:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode

    they're common enough only worth a few euro as ornaments


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 312 ✭✭Cuchulain


    Thanks tricky. Looks like you've found the answer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Geolite?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,249 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I am no expert but that look like it might be an agate nodule that has been cracked in half. Another term for them is thundereggs.


Advertisement