Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Extending copyright is music to major labels' ears

Options
  • 23-01-2009 7:16am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭


    Extending copyright is music to major labels' ears
    Friday, January 23, 2009


    McCreevy’s new directive could be better known as the “music label preservation order”, since it is designed to shuttle back into the record label’s possession the recordings of the first rock’n’roll songs, which are now beginning to fall out of copyright.

    Copyright term extension is a policy that most economic experts, left and right, agree has given little benefit to artists and a lot to major media companies seeking to eke out an income from their back catalogue.

    Since the first complaints were raised in 1998, the arguments have grown louder and stronger against copyright term extension.

    We now know, through the rise of the net, that works can spread and can be protected by allowing them to be duplicated and spread by those who love them.

    The public domain – the free space that all copyrighted works fall into after their time is up – is flourishing. It’s easier to find a work that’s fallen out of copyright (like Night of the Living Dead, a 1968 film that fell into the public domain due to administrative error), than to obtain a paid-for copy of many VHS classics.

    Meanwhile, old films – not just Mickey Mouse – that should have entered the public domain by now, allowing them to be freely copied and preserved are literally fading away, rotting as single copies in film studio vaults.

    But is giving rightsholders another chance to make a buck a bad thing? McCreevy would say not. He argued that extending copyright is a moral act, giving the living artists a pension they might not otherwise have. The truth is the majority of individual artists will gain €0.50 – €20 a year in “windfall” term extension profits.
    ..

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



Comments

Advertisement