OH HAPPY DAY - Calderon Resigns

Chong

http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_19658.shtml

Mikeyt086

Now a race is on to see who can guarentee Ronaldo in a more convincing way! Woohoo!

Chong

Mikeyt086 wrote: »

Now a race is on to see who can guarentee Ronaldo in a more convincing way! Woohoo!

Yup step forward Senor Florentino Perez.

Mitch Connor

Chong wrote: »

Yup step forward Senor Florentino Perez.

It will be fun to see.

Tuesday: Ronaldo specifically mentioned he didn't have a deal with Perez - obviously this is a clever way of wording it cause he obviously has a deal with Calderon.

Friday: Ronaldo specifically mentioned he did not have a deal with Perez - why would he mention Perez if there was not some sort of deal. the liar.

Waiting for the Gueme Balague exclusive, or however you spell his name,

Great another presidential election filled with "I guarantee I wil sign Gerrard, Ronaldo, fabregas and Lampard" etc etc.

Cue vote and then none of these players joining. Same every time!

Chong

Deleted User wrote: »

Great another presidential election filled with "I guarantee I wil sign Gerrard, Ronaldo, fabregas and Lampard" etc etc.

Cue vote and then none of these players joining. Same every time!

The worrying thing is though alot of the time Flo Perez always got his man.

Headshot

I wouldnt be suprised to see the next president go for Kaka

of course they cant compete with city money wise

but who would kaka rather go to madrid or city

Chong

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

I wouldnt be suprised to see the next president go for Kaka

of course they cant compete with city money wise

but who would kaka rather go to madrid or city

Whoever offers the most cash to Milan and who ever pays the most.

Melion

The next president will be promising Rafa, not Ronaldo

Headshot

Chong wrote: »

Whoever offers the most cash to Milan and who ever pays the most.

yes your right in 1 way but the players have so much power these days

which isnt right one bit

from what iv read Kaka doesnt seem to be to much interested in the money,he just wants to play at the top

Real madrid could offer him CL which he wont get with city for along time

personally i would love to see him in the PL but the amount of money is the part that pisses me off

Bounty Hunter

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

yes your right in 1 way but the players have so much power these days

which isnt right one bit

from what iv read Kaka doesnt seem to be to much interested in the money,he just wants to play at the top

Real madrid could offer him CL which he wont get with city for along time

personally i would love to see him in the PL but the amount of money is the part that pisses me off

well from my reading of it Kaka wasnt interested in playing with anyone but Milan. However Milan like any sensible group of people thought 107m had to be considerd and if Milan want to sell him Kaka could be convinced that Man City is the future and he will be paid stupid money to be their new god.

Real Madrid wouldent offer 100+million and if they did it would be idiocy either bas they would have to justify that sum far more so than one of the richest people in the world who has money to burn would. Even if they did somehow match City's bid, they would be far more likely to do so in the Summer after elections and by the Kaka would either be a Man City player (who knows maybe even captain) or still at his beloved Milan where i doubt he would want to go through all this again.

the Rafa to madrid ticket would be far more likely although Rafa will have signed a new pool contract by the Summer so id say itl be back to Ronaldo to madrid that Perez and co will use.

Zatman

Florentino Perez will be back in charge and his record of signing name players is phenomenal and his media games will make Calderon look like a child. Its about to get dirtier

Bobalicious93

Mitch Connor wrote: »

It will be fun to see.

Tuesday: Ronaldo specifically mentioned he didn't have a deal with Perez - obviously this is a clever way of wording it cause he obviously has a deal with Calderon.

Friday: Ronaldo specifically mentioned he did not have a deal with Perez - why would he mention Perez if there was not some sort of deal. the liar.

Waiting for the Gueme Balague exclusive, or however you spell his name,

You realise he specifically said there was no deal with Perez because he was asked if there was a deal with Perez, don't you?

Not clever wording, just answering the qustions he was asked

Mitch Connor

Bobalicious93 wrote: »

You realise he specifically said there was no deal with Perez because he was asked if there was a deal with Perez, don't you?

Not clever wording, just answering the qustions he was asked

I was having a go at the press and THEIR spin on it.

I have said the same as yourself previously.