Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

density functions

  • 13-01-2009 9:04pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 48


    Hi, im havin trouble understanding how the joint density is achieved in this question. i have the total solution to the problem but cant understand where step 1 gets pulled out of, is there a formula i should know about or what? any help really appreciated.

    heres the question.

    "Assume that V ~ X^2_r and W ~ X^2_s and that these random variables are independent. Determine the density function of


    F = (V/r)/(W/s).

    Solution begins like this...

    step 1: Joint density of V and W is

    {[v^((r/2) - 1) . e^-v/2] . [w^((s/2) - 1) . e^-w/2]} / {[2^(r/2) . R (r/2)] . 2^s/2 . R (s/2)]}

    = kv^((r/2)-1) w^((s/2) -1) . e^(-1/2(v+w)) , k = 1/ [2^(r/2) R (r/2) 2^s/2 . R (s/2)]


    hope u can understand that. thanks a million!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭Grudaire


    The density of V and W is the Chi-squared density, ie

    [v^((r/2) - 1) . e^-v/2] / [2^(r/2) . G (r/2)] - G = gamma

    so the joint density is f(V,W) = h(V) . g(W) where:

    h(V) = density of V
    g(W) = denity of W

    which gives you f(V,W) = your function


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 qwertykeyboards


    i looked up the chi-squared prob dens function and understand how this bit is achieved,
    {[v^((r/2) - 1) . e^-v/2] . [w^((s/2) - 1) . e^-w/2]} / {[2^(r/2) . R (r/2)] . 2^s/2 . R (s/2)]}

    but im still unsure where this bit comes from.
    = kv^((r/2)-1) w^((s/2) -1) . e^(-1/2(v+w))

    this question alone could nearly pass me on this exam so just want to be sure on everythin! thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭Grudaire


    {[v^((r/2) - 1) . e^-v/2] . [w^((s/2) - 1) . e^-w/2]} / {[2^(r/2) . R (r/2)] . 2^s/2 . R (s/2)]}

    = {v^((r/2) - 1) * w^((s/2) - 1) * e ^-v/2 * e^-w/2} * 1/{[2^(r/2) . R (r/2)] . 2^s/2 . R (s/2)]}

    let k = 1/ [2^(r/2) R (r/2) 2^s/2 . R (s/2)]

    = k * v^((r/2)-1) w^((s/2) -1) . e^(-1/2(v+w))


    it's just simplification where you take out k as a constant so you don't have to write the whole long thing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 qwertykeyboards


    thanks for the help as usual mate! maths stats test gonna be a load of balls!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 qwertykeyboards


    sorry man just 2 more problems, firstly, in the last bit of the solution (its the last page of keoghs notes) where we're solving h (f) he changes the integral from 0 up to infinity of [x^((r+s)/2)] . (e^(-x)) (dx) into G ((r+s)/2) G = Gamma

    i cant see where he's getting this from. nothing else changes on the 2 lines except for this.

    also, in the other density function problem, the one on the previous page of his notes (8.1), in step 1 he gets pi into his joint density function. what is that all about? is it somethin to do with the Z ~ N (0, 1) at the top? and what does that mean if its not?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭Grudaire


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function

    It's the same thing

    and yea, the density of Z is e^(-(z^2)/2)/sqrt(2*pi) times something if Z ~ N(0,1)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 qwertykeyboards


    cliste, this is the only question 5 that differs from the other 2 kinds in the last 9 years, do you know how this one is done differently? he'd be actin the bollo* to put it up hasnt been up in 7 years or somethin. have the other 2 learned now thanks for ur help with them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,620 ✭✭✭Grudaire


    cliste, this is the only question 5 that differs from the other 2 kinds in the last 9 years, do you know how this one is done differently? he'd be actin the bollo* to put it up hasnt been up in 7 years or somethin. have the other 2 learned now thanks for ur help with them.

    Same strategy:

    Joint density X,Y

    Find jacobian and Change variables,

    integrate with respect to the second variable

    and you've your density


Advertisement