Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Penalty: Men vs Women

  • 12-01-2009 1:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭


    Hi - myself and himself have committed this year to running a marathon. We've both run a couple of half-marathons in the past, and this year have a bet to see who can get the fastest time in a marathon....within a certain penalty limit.

    I know it's hard to compare like with like, but we're trying to gauge what an appropriate time penalty to apply to him, being a man and most likely to run a faster time than myself...

    Forfeit proceeds are going to Charity, but we are both very competitive so I'd like the time penalty to be as fair as possible.

    Any idea where I could get a rough average of this information?

    Thanks a mill....


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 606 ✭✭✭aburke




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,558 ✭✭✭plodder


    I had a copy of the complete result list for the 2004 Dublin marathon, so for pig iron, I put the top 100 male and female finishers (in the senior, ie. non veteran category) into a spreadsheet to see how the times compare.

    The average male time was 2:43 and the average female time was 3:30, which is a difference of about 22%

    So, you could use that percentage value as a yardstick ..... :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,365 ✭✭✭hunnymonster


    problem with that analysis is that there are far fewer women than men in most marathons. It might be more appropriate to take the average of the top 10% men and top 10% women?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    I think you would need to do it by %'ages alright due to difference in the numbers competing. Also if Paula is in it the set of numbers your looking at then pick another race as she would skew the difference even more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,558 ✭✭✭plodder


    problem with that analysis is that there are far fewer women than men in most marathons. It might be more appropriate to take the average of the top 10% men and top 10% women?
    Good point. In those categories men outnumbered women by around 3 to 1. So by comparing the top 100 men with the top 30 women, the avg. difference was reduced to about 15%, which does sounds more reasonable ...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,031 ✭✭✭Stupid_Private


    You could go with age graded calculators.

    A 30 year old male running a 3.30 hour marathon would score 70%
    A 30 year old female running a 3:49 hour marathon would score 70%

    It does depend on the level though as a 2.30 male marathon would equate to a 2.44 female marathon.

    Here's the link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭aviendha


    Thanks a mill for all the replies peoples!! Am working on the % game.. like I said, doesn't have to be an exact science (I'm trying to veer away from the bell curve normal distribution pitch!) but something that's relatively reasonable! Cheers! :)


Advertisement