Mk4 Vs. Zeiss Conquest

Jonty

Hi all,

I'm a constant dreamer. I'd love a zeiss conquest 6.5-20X50. But the way the euro sterling rate is gone, I got to thinking that a Leupold Mk 4 would be interesting also. I've only ever seen a zeiss conquest in the flesh and was wondering does anybody here have a Mk 4? If so could they be kind enough to post a review of it? Or if anybody has handled a zeiss and a Mk 4 side by side could they post a comparison?

Its to go on a T3 tactical .223. I've currently got a Simmons whitetail classic 4.5-14X40 and I've had it since 1999 so it owes me nothing!!

Valter

Jonty wrote: »

Hi all,

I'm a constant dreamer. I'd love a zeiss conquest 6.5-20X50. But the way the euro sterling rate is gone, I got to thinking that a Leupold Mk 4 would be interesting also. I've only ever seen a zeiss conquest in the flesh and was wondering does anybody here have a Mk 4? If so could they be kind enough to post a review of it? Or if anybody has handled a zeiss and a Mk 4 side by side could they post a comparison?

Its to go on a T3 tactical .223. I've currently got a Simmons whitetail classic 4.5-14X40 and I've had it since 1999 so it owes me nothing!!

It's pure sh!te when I tried it with my Steyr LG110

It wasn't me!

Valter wrote: »

It's pure sh!te when I tried it with my Steyr LG110

Which is this? both seem to be excellent scopes on paper.

Valter

It wasn't me! wrote: »

Which is this? both seem to be excellent scopes on paper.

I was joking, I wouldn't insult the Conquest!

Jonty

Thanks Valter, anybody got a Mk 4?