Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Wouldn't the NWO be covering this up?

  • 09-12-2008 11:59pm
    #1
    Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7773717.stm

    I mean it's something they could do pretty easily if they controlled the media?
    And it's something them would want covered up?

    So why didn't they?

    Why did bring charges up against this guy in the first place?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    King Mob wrote: »
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7773717.stm

    I mean it's something they could do pretty easily if they controlled the media?
    And it's something them would want covered up?

    So why didn't they?

    Why did bring charges up against this guy in the first place?

    Why would the globalists want to cover this up? Why would they care? Is this going to cause any problems to the Kissinger/Brzinski/Rockefeller NWO agenda? No.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So then there is corruption without NWO approval?:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    King Mob wrote: »
    So then there is corruption without NWO approval?:eek:

    Corruption always exists. You think the global agenda would give a toss about 1 senator in the US? :confused:


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Kernel wrote: »
    Corruption always exists. You think the global agenda would give a toss about 1 senator in the US? :confused:
    Maybe because he was caught trying to sell a senate seat to major businesses?
    Seems like a NWO thing to do?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Ah, but the NWO are smarter than that. They know that truthers are on to them. So covering up the story would be too simple. They have to let it be shown to cast doubt on their existence. But truthers know that they'd do this. And the NWO know they know. So they let it be shown so that those who know they know may second guess what they know, thinking that they know something that they don't know when in reality what they don't know is that what they know isn't what they think they know. And what they used to know was closer to what they should know than what they currently know. You know?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    very Cromulent point there Humanji


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    All joking aside humanji, I'm sure at this late stage in the game the elites couldn't care less about 1 US governor influencing the position of one senator/senate seat. The North American Union is in place, the EU is in place, the African Union is in place... The global war on terror is in place, as is the new global economic crisis. The pieces are in place for the plan to succeed.

    The senate? Small fry, people, we're through the looking glass here.


Advertisement