If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

uniltaeral offers

golum · 2008-12-01 12:11:42

Does anybody have a good authority for revocation of the above-preferably an Irish case, but any common law would suffice. Also any cases in which a good advertised was subsequently sold not to a customer but to an employee of the company which placed the ad.

01-12-2008 12:11pm

#1

golum

Closed Accounts Posts: 70 ✭✭

Join Date: August 2008

Posts: 43

Does anybody have a good authority for revocation of the above-preferably an Irish case, but any common law would suffice.
Also any cases in which a good advertised was subsequently sold not to a customer but to an employee of the company which placed the ad.

0

Comments

#2 01-12-2008 12:51pm

Tom Young

Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 4233

Daulia v. Four Millbank Nominees [1978] Ch 231
Errington v. Errington [1952] 1 KB 290
Dickinson v. Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 [Communication]
Byrne v. Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344 [Postal Rule]

0