Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Nikon 24-70 2.8 issue

  • 11-11-2008 7:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,944 ✭✭✭


    I got my Nikon 24-70 2.8 about a month ago in NY and I don't really shoot that much between 24-70. If I do it's usually 50mm 1.4. I decided to use it exclusively over the weekend and my suspicions were confirmed. The odd time I'd played around with it, I was never really in awe or impressed by it's sharpness. On one hand I thought it was down to me but on the other hand I never had problems with longer lenses at slower shutter speeds that only cost a fraction of the 24-70. This was shot at 70mm, f/4, ISO 400 and 1/800s.
    Long story short is I got a dud copy that front focuses and isn't sharp at all no matter what aperture. The good news is its worldwide warranty so no problems to get it repaired.

    Here's a sample image and a 100% crop on the focus point. Terrible huh!

    softnessissue1.jpg

    100crop-1.jpg


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    jasus thats balls


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭mumof2


    Thank god for world wide warranty!:eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Phototoxin


    my eyes !! I need acid to cleanse them !!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Calina


    that's very disappointing pete. I'd be gutted I must say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,843 ✭✭✭Arciphel


    Pete, have you tried doing a test with a focus chart to confirm this? the only reason I ask is that there doesn't look to be anything really in focus on that image, i'd say one of the internal lens elements is messed up or something. Have you a UV filter on it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,944 ✭✭✭pete4130


    There is a UV filter on it. Nothing is really in focus because it doesn't really focus on anything. I do think an element is out of alignment andd thats causing the problems. I've tried it with and without the UV filter. Even at f/8 its softer than any other lens I have wide open at 1.4 or 2.8.

    I dropped into Gunnes just to get a 2nd opinion and they were horrified/shocked at how bad the lens was.

    I am gutted. Just have to send it off now and wait for the (hopefully) good news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,048 ✭✭✭RoryW


    I came across this focus test chart today and remembered this thread (mainly because since it was posted it has made me paranoid about whether I have a problem with my own 24-70 lens :eek:)

    http://www.focustestchart.com/focus21.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,944 ✭✭✭pete4130


    Rory,

    Thanks for that, I'll have a look at it!

    Pete.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,221 ✭✭✭RichyX


    I've found those focus charts to be a bit of a balls myself.
    My Pentax 35mm f/2 seems to back focus badly, but the focus chart makes it seem ok, whatever that suggests.


Advertisement