WWE RELEASES TWO MORE SUPERSTARS

Headshot

no big loss tbh

http://www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=34501&p=1

WWE released Paul London and Chuck Palumbo today as part of their new cost cutting initiative. Neither man's release was a surprise. Palumbo has already sent out feelers in Mexico looking for work while London hasn't been used in some time. Of course, "WWE wishes them the best in all future endeavors."

gimmick

Huge opportunity for London to have a return to ROH. Could be exciting.

rovert

*Slow Handclap*

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055414935

Headshot

rovert wrote: »

*Slow Handclap*

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055414935

sorry never saw the thread

rovert

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

sorry never saw the thread

Was the title too vague?

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

Was the title too vague?

Alright alright, he said he never saw the thread. No need to be a dick about it.
Time to move on.

flahavaj

Theres your next ROh champion right there. He would add a freshness to the ROH card, theres so many new match-ups he could have

Book it Ga...I mean, Pearce.

rovert

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Alright alright, he said he never saw the thread. No need to be a dick about it.
Time to move on.

So why is this thread still here?

The other thread hasnt left the top 5 or 6 threads in this forum since it was posted. Im not being a dick just asking a another poster to take a cautionary look at what has been posted recently.

flahavaj

And now THIS thread is at the top of the page, because you bumped it. If your not careful your OFFICIAL "Chuck Palumbo has been fired" thread is in danger of being usurped by this clearly superior imposter.:eek:

rovert

flahavaj wrote: »

And now THIS thread is at the top of the page, because you bumped it. If your not careful your OFFICIAL "Chuck Palumbo has been fired" thread is in danger of being usurped by this clearly superior imposter.:eek:

It isnt about MY OFFICAL thread or anything it is just stupid to have to threads on the topic on the exact same thing.

flahavaj

If you keep poting in this topic it will keep getting to the top of the page rovert and your cries will have fallen on deaf ears.

In fact now this thread has more posts than the other one. I hereby move that the mods delete your deeply unpopular thread and retain this, the unanimous choice of the boards PW public.

DRakE

rovert broke the news first, lets give him his mad props for it

rovert

flahavaj wrote: »

If you keep poting in this topic it will keep getting to the top of the page rovert and your cries will have fallen on deaf ears.

In fact now this thread has more posts than the other one. I hereby move that the mods delete your deeply unpopular thread and retain this, the unanimous choice of the boards PW public.

DRakE wrote: »

rovert broke the news first, lets give him his mad props for it

Lads stop trolling and trying to turn this into something you want it to be which I dont.

Red Sleeping Beauty

rovert wrote: »

Was the title too vague?

:eek: rovert shoots on headshot. oh my god

Headshot

Rovert its my mistake right

but ffs everybody makes mistakes

you didnt have to act like a dick

next time ill do a search

i dont have the wrestling knowledge you have but ffs stop being a dick

rovert shoots on headshot. oh my god

no suprise tbh

rovert

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

Rovert its my mistake right

but ffs everybody makes mistakes

Fine

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

you didnt have to act like a dick

I wasnt being a dick as Ive already posted in this thread, maybe you missed that too. :rolleyes:

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

next time ill do a search

Did you actually read this thread as Ive already said this that all you need to do is to take cautionary look the most recent threads? You dont need to do a search to see a thread that was at most 5 or 6 threads from the top of this forum.

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

actaully i wont bother posting on the wrestling forum anymore

This is a total over reaction by yourself, dont be so precious.

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

i dont have the wrestling knowledge you have but ffs stop being a dick

This has nothing to do with wrestling knowledge just using your eyes mate.

flahavaj

rovert wrote: »

Lads stop trolling and trying to turn this into something you want it to be which I dont.

LOL you bumped it again. You obviously prefer this thread yourself now.

rovert

flahavaj wrote: »

LOL you bumped it again. You obviously prefer this thread yourself now.

Yawn, low grade trolling

Red Sleeping Beauty

{(-_-)}HeadShoT** wrote: »

no suprise tbh

im not going to really bother posting on the wrestling forum anymore

Tits. I've never seen such bolloxology on one forum before. Or at least so concentrated.

Anyway, I hated Palumbo. His biker gimmick was rubbish. Never a fan of the FBI thing. Were they released or was it that their contracts were up ?

rovert

alan dunne 27 wrote: »

Anyway, I hated Palumbo. His biker gimmick was rubbish. Never a fan of the FBI thing. Were they released or was it that their contracts were up ?

London was simply released while Chuck's contract was simply not renewed as it is set to expired soon.

krudler

rovert wrote: »

London was simply released while Chuck's contract was simply not renewed as it is set to expired soon.

dont you have your own thread to be posting in:D

Thats what London gets for smiling like a goon at the wrong time, Palumbo is no loss, the biker gimmick sucked when Taker did it, still sucks now

the flananator

flahavaj wrote: »

If you keep poting in this topic it will keep getting to the top of the page rovert and your cries will have fallen on deaf ears.

In fact now this thread has more posts than the other one. I hereby move that the mods delete your deeply unpopular thread and retain this, the unanimous choice of the boards PW public.

lol

Otis Driftwood

Lads I would like to thank all previous posters in this thread.Ive had a crappy day and this thread made me laugh on 3 or 4 seperate occasions.


OT,Chuck can join up with Billy Gunn for the much anticipated Billy and Chuck reunion.

Altogether now - "You

---

Look

---

So

---

Good to me"

:D:D:D:D:D

flahavaj

rovert wrote: »

Yawn, low grade trolling

Im stunned and aghast at this scandalous accusation rovert. How very dare you! I was merely pointing out the obvious fact that your continued insistence upon posting in a rival thread will only lead the general posting public to believe that this and not yours is now the official thread on this topic. But carry on, every vote counts at the end of the day. I think its a foregone conclusion at this stage tbh, but thank you so much for the help.

flahavaj

nedtheshed wrote: »

Lads I would like to thank all previous posters in this thread.Ive had a crappy day and this thread made me laugh on 3 or 4 seperate occasions.


OT,Chuck can join up with Billy Gunn for the much anticipated Billy and Chuck reunion.

Altogether now - "You

---

Look

---

So

---

Good to me"

:D:D:D:D:D

Indeed. This thread>>>>>>inferior rival thread. The people have spoken.

jeffk

Just moving my replies into the official thread otherwise I feel they are losing out!!!

nice one london back on the indies
he was only spotted @ BOLA not so long ago to!

Last wwe lasting memory i have is london doing a running shooting star press of the apron on the same night as cena wrecked his arm doing his version of a hip toss!

Ah now im happy

krudler

bump for the official thread!

the flananator

I don't care for rovert's tread.

This thread has the kind of "get up and go" that I feel I can get into.

jeffk

Defo we need more threads like this!!!

CMpunked

nedtheshed wrote: »

Lads I would like to thank all previous posters in this thread.Ive had a crappy day and this thread made me laugh on 3 or 4 seperate occasions.


OT,Chuck can join up with Billy Gunn for the much anticipated Billy and Chuck reunion.

Altogether now - "You

---

Look

---

So

---

Good to me"

:D:D:D:D:D

Like the La Resistance reunion?



This thread has all the functions to be a candidate of "Thread of the year!"

Red Sleeping Beauty

4 stars from me anyway.
Meltzer only gives it 2 and a half due to slow workrate.

rovert

If I did this carry on most of you would be throwing tantrums. I think this thread is funny albeit childish.

jeffk

alan dunne 27 wrote: »

4 stars from me anyway.
Meltzer only gives it 2 and a half due to slow workrate.

And the spot fest don't forget that!that's a no no

rovert

alan dunne 27 wrote: »

4 stars from me anyway.
Meltzer only gives it 2 and a half due to slow workrate.

jeffk wrote: »

And the spot fest don't forget that!that's a no no

If you are going to make fun of something you should at least know about what you are making fun of. Anyway Dave has given spotfests (mostly from ROH) in the past ****+ numerous times.

jeffk

rovert wrote: »

If you are going to make fun of something you should at least know about what you are making fun of. Anyway Dave has given spotfests (mostly from ROH) in the past ****+ numerous times.

Source?

rovert

jeffk wrote: »

Source?

Yore Ma

Seriously dude it is the first rule of satire.

jeffk

rovert wrote: »

Yore Ma

Seriously dude it is the first rule of satire.

To late reported original post,cant have people slagging mammys on forums

rovert

jeffk wrote: »

To late reported original post,cant have people slagging mammys on forums

Observe that

callaway92

jeffk wrote: »

To late reported original post,cant have people slagging mammys on forums

Stop acting like a child ffs..some people here act like fúcking dicks for no reason..See post I quoted

CMpunked

callaway92 wrote: »

Stop acting like a child ffs..some people here act like fúcking dicks for no reason..See post I quoted

Huh?! who acted like a child? just curious?

callaway92

Jeffk

Bubs101

Comic-Book-Guy wrote: »

Huh?! who acted like a child? just curious?

Everyone here annoying Rovert. At least it's entertaining though. Could see Rovert bumping his thread in a years time to win the feud

rovert

Bubs101 wrote: »

Everyone here annoying Rovert

Im not annoyed though just amazed at the ridiclousness other people can get away with in this thread while having almost uniform approval from the other posters here. All Ive ever wanted was this thread merged with the one I posted. You know the standard practice on boards. But at this stage there is so much crap it this thread is it worth the mod's time?

Red Sleeping Beauty

rovert wrote: »

Im not annoyed though just amazed at the ridiclousness other people can get away with in this thread while having almost uniform approval from the other posters here. All Ive ever wanted was this thread merged with the one I posted. You know the standard practice on boards. But at this stage there is so much crap it this thread is it worth the mod's time?

A simple report post to a mod would've got the thread merged when a mod got the message and that would have been that . But you had to carry on posting and baiting an arguement with this post:

rovert wrote: »

Was the title too vague?

Shawn tried to preempt it with his post :

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Alright alright, he said he never saw the thread. No need to be a dick about it.
Time to move on.

But you wouldn't leave it :

rovert wrote: »

So why is this thread still here?

The other thread hasnt left the top 5 or 6 threads in this forum since it was posted. Im not being a dick just asking a another poster to take a cautionary look at what has been posted recently.

Mods have lives, this thread went up at 12 and 4hrs later you're moaning about it still being here. I'm sure the mods have better things to do than monitor this forum 24/7 to make sure that there's no duplicate threads. Duplicate threads happen, deal with it.

rovert

alan dunne 27 wrote: »

A simple report post to a mod would've got the thread merged when a mod got the message and that would have been that .

I did report it this morning, I asked for it to be merged.

alan dunne 27 wrote: »

Shawn tried to preempt it with his post :

Did you see my response to that :rolleyes:

alan dunne 27 wrote: »

Mods have lives, this thread went up at 12 and 4hrs later you're moaning about it still being here. I'm sure the mods have better things to do than monitor this forum 24/7 to make sure that there's no duplicate threads. Duplicate threads happen, deal with it.

I tried to deal with it but others stirred the ****:
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=57836167&postcount=13