Vince McMahon

MILF

Can anyone shed some light on where the hell Vince McMahon has gone??

I know there was a whole big "thing" about a light falling on him while he was doing McMahon's Millions a while back but have they actually killed him off or did he genuinely hurt himself or whats the craic??

Vince135792003

MILF wrote: »

I know there was a whole big "thing" about a light falling on him while he was doing McMahon's Millions a while back but have they actually killed him off or did he genuinely hurt himself or whats the craic??

He wasn't hurt. It was just a stunt.

It was part of a storyline that they kind of just forgot about but maybe it might be brought up again sometime.

rainybobainy

Last night shane and stephanie were talking about him in the past tense so there should be a storyline for him coming up soon

Bubs101

rainybobainy wrote: »

Last night shane and stephanie were talking about him in the past tense so there should be a storyline for him coming up soon

Either Meltzer or Alverez said they suspected that they could be going for a Vince and Shane vs. Stephenie and Hunter angle soon if they keep playing up tension between Shane and Steph

ShawnRaven

Bubs101 wrote: »

Either Meltzer or Alverez said they suspected that they could be going for a Vince and Shane vs. Stephenie and Hunter angle soon if they keep playing up tension between Shane and Steph

Aw no! Seriously? That sucked in 2000, it didn't draw money, it didn't draw interest then. Whats the difference now?

brick tamland

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Aw no! Seriously? That sucked in 2000, it didn't draw money, it didn't draw interest then. Whats the difference now?

WWE in re-using old old storylines shocker;)

amacachi

Thought it was obvious they were goin down a family feud from what I saw the other night.

Bubs101

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Aw no! Seriously? That sucked in 2000, it didn't draw money, it didn't draw interest then. Whats the difference now?

Well Vince is older and Steph and Shane are far more experienced, not to mention that he has taken alot of time off from T.V. recently so he might be willing to give them more control of the product which would certainly make the fued more interesting than last time, if they tied it in with a real switch in control

brick tamland

would it involve a super Hunter heel turn

always preferred him as a heel anyway

Bubs101

brick tamland wrote: »

would it involve a super Hunter heel turn

always preferred him as a heel anyway

It would have to. It would be very difficult to turn Shane heel against his sister considering how popular he is. The man is a hero

ShawnRaven

Bubs101 wrote: »

It may not have to. It wouldn't be very difficult to turn Shane heel against his sister considering how boring he is. The man is a one major bump spotmunky

Now that i've fixed your post for you, you can thank me later.

Vince is good in short bursts here and there, but I dont like when he sticks around for months and months at a time. He loses his appeal quickly to me.

Bubs101

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Now that i've fixed your post for you, you can thank me later.

Said it before and I'll say it again, Shane vs. XPac=Buys.

Probably has more to do with how great of a heel Steph was with Jericho. In general she is an awesome heel. Chip of the old block

ShawnRaven

Bubs101 wrote: »

Said it before and I'll say it again, Shane vs. XPac=Buys.

Yes, because we all know that was the real main event of Wrestlemania 15

Probably has more to do with how great of a heel Steph was with Jericho. In general she is an awesome heel. Chip of the old block

Steph is as good of a heel as Vickie Guerrero is. Screechy, annoying irritating voice which gets right on the crowds nerves.

Mind you, it works..

EXCUSE ME!!!!

Kinda sucks though. That because you have an annoying voice, they make you a major heel.

rovert

To the OP think Howard Hughes

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Aw no! Seriously? That sucked in 2000, it didn't draw money, it didn't draw interest then.

Sorry what?

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

Sorry what?

It's simple, it was overdone in 2000. They crucified Wrestlemania that year by taking the focus off the guys in the ring, and focusing it on every McMahon that was in their corner, hell, that was even the tagline to promote the event!

rovert

ShawnRaven wrote: »

It's simple, it was overdone in 2000. They crucified Wrestlemania that year by taking the focus off the guys in the ring, and focusing it on every McMahon that was in their corner, hell, that was even the tagline to promote the event!

That wasnt what I asking you about. They did draw money and interest, if they didnt where did they get that reputation with the Networks as being able to draw money and interest?

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

if you the didnt where did they get that reputation with the Networks..

To quote your good self... "Sorry, what?!"

rovert

ShawnRaven wrote: »

To quote your good self... "Sorry, what?!"

Fixed.

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

That wasnt what I asking you about. They did draw money and interest, if they didnt where did they get that reputation with the Networks as being able to draw money and interest?

They had that reputation long before the family feud storyline came into it, you know that as well as I do. Austin/McMahon is primarily responsibility for their reputation with the networks. USA Network in particular.

However their reputation with networks wasn't as great as you made it out to be by the time 2000 rolled around, one of the reasons Vince moved to TNN towards the end of that very year. Wrestlemania is still one of the poorest Wrestlemanias to be churned out by the WWE as a result of the four way made that way to throw every McMahon in there (because Show wasn't drawing as champion from a few months earlier and Foley has officially "retired" by that stage)

rovert

ShawnRaven wrote: »

They had that reputation long before the family feud storyline came into it, you know that as well as I do. Austin/McMahon is primarily responsibility for their reputation with the networks. USA Network in particular.

However their reputation with networks wasn't as great as you made it out to be by the time 2000 rolled around, one of the reasons Vince moved to TNN towards the end of that very year. Wrestlemania is still one of the poorest Wrestlemanias to be churned out by the WWE as a result of the four way made that way to throw every McMahon in there (because Show wasn't drawing as champion from a few months earlier and Foley has officially "retired" by that stage)

Vince and Stephanie did good business in their feud on the Smackdown brand after that and after 2000

JP Liz

I'm glad Vince is off screen

Red Sleeping Beauty

ShawnRaven wrote: »

Yes, because we all know that was the real main event of Wrestlemania 15

I just want to see Shane take more big bumps onto padded crash mats . I liked the Xpac match but there was no big bump. Shane's a wannabe stunt man.

gimmick

I would have said "wannabe" stuntman as opposed to "glorified".

Red Sleeping Beauty

Fixed