Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[Article] Bus operator settles High Court action

  • 29-10-2008 2:12am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭


    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2008/1028/breaking76.htm
    Bus operator settles High Court action
    MARY CAROLAN

    A private bus company has settled its High Court action against the Minister for Transport over a decision allowing Dublin Bus change a route between Swords and Dublin Airport with the alleged effect of threatening the private company’s business.

    Swords Express had claimed the Minister’s decision was unlawful and allowed unfair competition by Dublin Bus.

    Digital Messenger Limited, trading as Swords Express, of Lower Grand Canal Street, Dublin, had brought its case against the Minister with Dublin Bus as a notice party. The claims were denied.

    Yesterday afternoon, following lengthy discussions outside court, Mr Justice Daniel Herbert was told by Mr Frank Callanan SC, for Swords Express, “matters had been agreed” between his clients and the Minister. No terms of the settlement were outlined to the court.

    Mr Brian Cregan SC, for Dublin Bus, said his client was seeking the costs of the case. That costs application was resisted by both Paul O’Higgins SC, for the Minister, and Mr Callanan.

    The judge said he was adjourning the case to tomorrow to allow all sides consider their position on costs in light of the fact the main issue between Swords Express and the Minister had been resolved. The case had been expected to last for two days.

    Swords Express brought the case over the Minister’s decision to allow Dublin Bus alter its route from Swords to Dublin — the 41X route — so as to permit the route pass through the Port Tunnel. The Swords Express service operates between Swords and the Custom House Quay via the Port tunnel.

    Swords Express claimed Dublin Bus receives a State subsidy and can afford to transport passengers at a lower fare than other licensed operators. It argued it was entitled, as a matter of fair procedures and natural and constitutional justice, to make submissions to the Minister before the Minister decided Dublin Bus’ proposed service would not compete with Swords Express’s service but was given no such opportunity.

    The company claimed the Minister prejudged the matter and, by negotiating with Dublin Bus, made his decision in a biased manner or in a manner such as to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.

    It further claimed Dublin Bus and a public representative who lobbied on its behalf were told the application to alter the route would be successful before the decision was actually made.

    Swords Express also claimed it applied last January for a further annual passenger licence to operate a continuous passenger road service from April last between Brackenstown Road and O’Connell Bridge via Applewood but, to date, the Minister had failed to determine the application.

    The delay has adversely affected its ability to operate its business effectively, the company claimed. Yhe Minister had denied the claims.


Advertisement