Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

F4 Corporate & Business Law study

  • 18-10-2008 8:30pm
    #1
    Maclyn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭


    Hi,

    Studying this subject at the minute and with 6 weeks to go, was wondering am I going the right direction.

    I have covered up to the end of the Law of Contract chapter and am familiar with all the questions (according to BPP and past papers) to do with all so far.

    With all the cases, is it necessary to learn every single cases for each point (Exceptions to Privity Rule, Exceptions to Past Consideration etc)?

    I hope that I am ok so far, or should I be further on? How is everyone else getting on.

    Sorry should of mentioned, that I am doing home study so am not in contact with any lecturer or tutor to keep me in tow.

    Thanks


Comments

  • #2
    Mr. Incognito
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    The facts and the logic applied are moe important than the name of the case.

    its not a matter of reaming off loads of case names, one or two or the more important ones are enough as long as they are relevant and you know why the court reached that decision.


  • #3
    Kinetic^
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭Kinetic^


    SetantaL wrote: »
    The facts and the logic applied are moe important than the name of the case.

    its not a matter of reaming off loads of case names, one or two or the more important ones are enough as long as they are relevant and you know why the court reached that decision.

    Defo agree. If you can convey that you understand it then you should be ok. Solomon vs Solomon would one of the more important cases. (I still remember it :D)


Advertisement