Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why dont we leave? Look at America

  • 18-09-2008 2:25pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭


    America's economic troubles are down 100% to the Federal Reserve. This system should never have started, they are living on borrowed money and most the people over there have no idea they will have to pay it back some day...those days are coming now!

    Why am I telling you this? We are in the exact same system, wonder why we didnt get a vote or were told this. We are exchanging goods and services for what might aswell be monopoly money.

    We have got some money off them, so lets get out! **** them, they're only leading us to one big super-state.

    How dare they call us ungrateful for practicing our (only recently won) democratic right.
    Ireland seems to be alot more 'in the know' about what's going on behind the scenes of global politics, we know what's coming, more bull****.

    Lets get out and really have OUR OWN COUNTRY!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    How dare they call us ungrateful for practicing our (only recently won) democratic right. Ireland seems to be alot more 'in the know' about what's going on behind the scenes of global politics, we know what's coming, more bull****.

    Who is calling us ungrateful?
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Lets get out and really have OUR OWN COUNTRY!

    What sort of economic structure do you propose bearing in mind the severe risk of structural unemployment if we revert back to a protectionist 'self sufficient' pie in the sky economic system.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,316 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    Did all those people taking out unaffordable mortgages not make that choice? Not sure what vote could have been had to stop them doing it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    sink wrote: »
    Who is calling us ungrateful?



    What sort of economic structure do you propose bearing in mind the severe risk of structural unemployment if we revert back to a protectionist 'self sufficient' pie in the sky economic system.
    It's lies that are the problem.
    What do people need? Food, clothes and shelter and to be happy. It's not hard!

    Food grows, we make clothes from these and we've too many houses. People have been converted by business men to thinking we need all this bull**** around us. They've made themselves think their above us, and we've forgotten what being human is about.

    All I know is that if we continue on with the E.U, we will not be happy.
    The people of Ireland dont have enough power at the moment to do anything about the state of their country, why should we give away more?

    Here's some quotes from these people we have leading us.

    “Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly … All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way.”
    - Former French President V.Giscard D’Estaing, who helped to draw up the EU Constitution which the French and Dutch rejected in their 2005 referendums and which is now being implemented through the Lisbon Treaty, Le Monde, 14 June 2007

    “France was just ahead of all the other countries in voting No. It would happen in all Member States if they have a referendum. There is a cleavage between people and governments … There will be no Treaty if we had a referendum in France, which would again be followed by a referendum in the UK.”
    - French President Nicolas Sarkozy,at meeting of senior MEPs, EUobserver, 14 November 2007

    “The difference between the original Constitution and the present Lisbon Treaty is one of approach, rather than content … The proposals in the original constitutional treaty are practically unchanged. They have simply been dispersed through the old treaties in the form of amendments. Why this subtle change? Above all, to head off any threat of referenda by avoiding any form of constitutional vocabulary … But lift the lid and look in the toolbox: all the same innovative and effective tools are there, just as they were carefully crafted by the European Convention.”
    - V.Giscard D’Estaing, former French President and Chairman of the Convention which drew up the EU Constitution, The Independent, London, 30 October 2007

    “They decided that the document should be unreadable. If it is unreadable, it is not constitutional, that was the sort of perception. Where they got this perception from is a mystery to me. In order to make our citizens happy, to produce a document that they will never understand! But, there is some truth [in it]. Because if this is the kind of document that the IGC will produce, any Prime Minister - imagine the UK Prime Minister - can go to the Commons and say ‘Look, you see, it’s absolutely unreadable, it’s the typical Brussels treaty, nothing new, no need for a referendum.’ Should you succeed in understanding it at first sight there might be some reason for a referendum, because it would mean that there is something new.”
    - Giuliano Amato, former Italian Prime Minister and Vice-Chairman of the Convention which drew up the EU Constitution, recorded by Open Europe, The Centre for European Reform, London, 12 July 2007

    “Sometimes I like to compare the EU as a creation to the organisation of empires. We have the dimension of Empire but there is a great difference. Empires were usually made with force with a centre imposing diktat, a will on the others. Now what we have is the first non-imperial empire.”
    Commission President J-M Barroso, The Brussels Journal, 11 July 2007

    “The aim of the Constitutional Treaty was to be more readable; the aim of this treaty is to be unreadable … The Constitution aimed to be clear, whereas this treaty had to be unclear. It is a success.
    - Karel de Gucht, Belgian Foreign Minister, Flandreinfo, 23 June 2007

    “The good thing about not calling it a Constltution is that no one can ask for a referendum on it.
    - Giuliano Amato, speech at London School of Econmics, 21 February 2007


    And that's not the half of it, I strongly suggest to everybody to turn off their TVs, stop buying papers or at least dont take the news seriously. Do your own research.

    The E.U leaders have made their intentions clear with these quotes, to mislead, misinform and to control an empire. Is New World Order still a dirty word? :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    America's economic troubles are down 100% to the Federal Reserve.

    Nothing like a blatenly broad and unsubstantiated claim as the first sentence of a 'new' boards user.

    Please explain your logic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    turgon wrote: »
    Nothing like a blatenly broad and unsubstantiated claim as the first sentence of a 'new' boards user.

    Please explain your logic.
    Ok.

    http://www.fdrs.org/negatives_of_the_federal_reserve_system.html

    Click it, please!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    It's lies that are the problem.
    What do people need? Food, clothes and shelter and to be happy. It's not hard!

    I certainly wouldn't be happy if that is all I had. Self fulfilment is essential for happiness. I am starting a career as a systems analyst which I have studied for for four years. I can't see myself feeling fulfilled in a largely agrarian based society nor would anyone else with an intellectual background.
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Food grows, we make clothes from these and we've too many houses. People have been converted by business men to thinking we need all this bull**** around us. They've made themselves think their above us, and we've forgotten what being human is about.

    You make it sound so simple when it's actually a very difficult thing to define. I probably don't share all the same desires as you and therefore the parameters by which we individually define 'being human' are very different. The beauty of a liberal capitalistic society is that everyone is free to define how they want to live instead of it being imposed from above.

    What you aspire to sounds eerily similar to anti-intellectual socialist movements in Asia such as the Khmer Rouge. I don't think everyone was too happy in that system.
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    All I know is that if we continue on with the E.U, we will not be happy.
    The people of Ireland dont have enough power at the moment to do anything about the state of their country, why should we give away more?

    Yes they do, if we stop electing populist politicians big improvements can be made.
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Here's some quotes from these people we have leading us.

    Pffft. You have no idea the amount of times these quotes have been regurgitated on boards. All of them are small sound bites taken out of context.
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Do your own research.

    I strongly suggest you do the same and stop regurgitating what you read from some conspiracy theorist on the web.
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    The E.U leaders have made their intentions clear with these quotes, to mislead, misinform and to control an empire.

    To what end? They already live very comfortable lifestyles, empires eventually fall and so do their leaders.
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Is New World Order still a dirty word? :o

    It at least helps us identify the youtube inaugurated.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭pwd


    arguing that you don't really need money if you've enough to eat is not going to win people over to your point of view.
    Funnily it's usually young people from middle-to-upper class backgrounds that espouse that sentiment.
    Can you give a source for any of those quotes you gave?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    The phrase New World Order is on the back of the American dollar bill and is a very, very old phrase. Your use of YouTube as a way of stereotyping just tells me what you know of the subject. 'Fools look at that stuff on youtube?'.
    YouTube is good if you dont know what you're looking for. I know.

    We are so far from nature most dont even realise.

    But please, dont take this discussion off topic. If you want to put this onto me please PM me. May I remind you that none of you know the first thing about my background or my class.
    If you knew the truth these things wouldnt even come into your head.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    pwd wrote: »
    arguing that you don't really need money if you've enough to eat is not going to win people over to your point of view.
    Funnily it's usually young people from middle-to-upper class backgrounds that espouse that sentiment.
    Can you give a source for any of those quotes you gave?
    If you had read the quotes, you would have read the source beneath them.

    I got them from www.nationalplatform.org


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    The phrase New World Order is on the back of the American dollar bill and is a very, very old phrase. Your use of YouTube as a way of stereotyping just tells me what you know of the subject. 'Fools look at that stuff on youtube?'.
    YouTube is good if you dont know what you're looking for. I know.

    We are so far from nature most dont even realise.

    But please, dont take this discussion off topic. If you want to put this onto me please PM me. May I remind you that none of you know the first thing about my background or my class.
    If you knew the truth these things wouldnt even come into your head.

    You must be talking about "Novus ordo seclorum" latin for "New Order of the Ages".

    It comes from the Ecologues by the Latin poet Virgil who wrote them circa 37 BCE.

    It is completely unrelated to the modern 'New World Order' conspiracy and any similarities are incidental and predictably are jumped upon by conspiracy theorists as evidence of some grand plot.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    sink wrote: »
    You must be talking about "Novus ordo seclorum" latin for "New Order of the Ages".

    It comes from the Ecologues by the Latin poet Virgil who wrote them circa 37 BCE.

    It is completely unrelated to the modern 'New World Order' conspiracy and any similarities are incidental and predictably are jumped upon by conspiracy theorists as evidence of some grand plot.
    Ah yes yes, that looks all neat and explained there alright...but?

    Gordon Brown NWO Speech-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0

    George Bush Snr. NWO Speech-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

    Barack Obama NWO Speech-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

    Bill Clinton NWO Speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvEqg_UlGaA

    Tony Blair NWO Speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxm5eKSZNRs

    Eisenhower Warns of NWO in 1961
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd8wwMFmCeE

    Henry Kissenger NWO Speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QHgo0xEyF4

    JFK Talks of NWO
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA

    Nixon Calls for NWO
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plVOrcii2Jk

    Sarkozy NWO speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3sDbRU2Huk

    Add to them the E.U quotes and we should be getting a clear picture.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Ah yes yes, that looks all neat and explained there alright...but?

    Gordon Brown NWO Speech-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0

    George Bush Snr. NWO Speech-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

    Barack Obama NWO Speech-
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a9Syi12RJo

    Bill Clinton NWO Speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvEqg_UlGaA

    Tony Blair NWO Speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxm5eKSZNRs

    Eisenhower Warns of NWO in 1961
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd8wwMFmCeE

    Henry Kissenger NWO Speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QHgo0xEyF4

    JFK Talks of NWO
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ngJNIk8elA

    Nixon Calls for NWO
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plVOrcii2Jk

    Sarkozy NWO speech
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3sDbRU2Huk

    Add to them the E.U quotes and we should be getting a clear picture.

    You have validated my hypothesis that 'New World Order' is an identifier used by people indoctrinated into the world of youtube conspiracies and I thank you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    sink wrote: »
    You have validated my hypothesis that 'New World Order' is an identifier used by people indoctrinated into the world of youtube conspiracies and I thank you.
    Haha, look man, If I was gonna put up videos about carrots and underwear they'd be from YouTube.

    It's exactly like calling me a stereotype for using Google as my search engine, completely ridiculous, wake up.

    If you feel it would validate the video evidence anymore if I put up links from Google Video? Or should I start my own video database?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭The Corinthian


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    What do people need? Food, clothes and shelter and to be happy. It's not hard!
    It's also called substance living. I think you'll find that not many people fancy that.
    All I know is that if we continue on with the E.U, we will not be happy.
    Did God tell you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭pwd


    I think corporations having too much power (compared to governments and otehrwise) is a bigger worry about the effects of globalisation than the development of a superstate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,693 ✭✭✭Jack Sheehan


    YAAAWWWNNN this isn't the first of such threads and by the looks of it won't be the last. If you feel the need to post this stuff, please read a rebuttal on one of the other threads by OscarBravo or one of the others. Sorry If I sound condescending it's just that I'm sick of these threads from bad wheather Eurosceptics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Haha, look man, If I was gonna put up videos about carrots and underwear they'd be from YouTube.

    It's exactly like calling me a stereotype for using Google as my search engine, completely ridiculous, wake up.

    If you feel it would validate the video evidence anymore if I put up links from Google Video? Or should I start my own video database?

    My point being that youtube videos are not authoritative sources of information as I could make a video about the 'New World Order' and stick it up there but it would not be carry much weight. That is unless the video was made and posted by someone who is well respected in their field.

    I viewed the first few of your videos and each one shows a leader speaking about a completely different and unrelated topic using 'new world order' as a descriptive phrase to convey their message of a new approach to international relations. The first one Brown is talking about globalisation and the world economy. In the second one HW Bush is talking about the construction and development of international organisations such as the UN and the ICJ. The two are not related.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    pwd wrote: »
    I think corporations having too much power (compared to governments and otehrwise) is a bigger worry about the effects of globalisation than the development of a superstate.
    Yes, you are dead right! But here's the thing...Bilderberg.

    Please look into it yourself, I'm not going to be able to convince you of the size of this problem, no one could convince me.
    To get cheesey and quote Bob Marley- "None but ourselves can free our minds!"

    Bilderberg happens once every year in different locations. At these meetings big businessmen and the worlds biggest politicians meet and discuss things for 2 days. No one knows what they talk about because general press isnt allowed in.

    This is a fact.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group


    Daniel Estulin has written many books on it. Many Irish media heads and politicans attend.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    sink wrote: »
    My point being that youtube videos are not authoritative sources of information as I could make a video about the 'New World Order' and stick it up there but it would not be carry much weight. That is unless the video was made and posted by someone who is well respected in their field.

    I viewed the first few of your videos and each one shows a leader speaking about a completely different and unrelated topic using 'new world order' as a descriptive phrase to convey their message of a new approach to international relations. The first one Brown is talking about globalisation and the world economy. In the second one HW Bush is talking about the construction and development of international organisations such as the UN and the ICJ. The two are not related.
    The development of international organisations is different to globalisation?

    And no, you couldnt put up video evidence of a world leader saying something he's never said on YouTube.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    Yes, you are dead right! But here's the thing...Bilderberg.

    Please look into it yourself, I'm not going to be able to convince you of the size of this problem, no one could convince me.
    To get cheesey and quote Bob Marley- "None but ourselves can free our minds!"

    Bilderberg happens once every year in different locations. At these meetings big businessmen and the worlds biggest politicians meet and discuss things for 2 days. No one knows what they talk about because general press isnt allowed in.

    This is a fact.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group


    Daniel Estulin has written many books on it. Many Irish media heads and politicans attend.

    http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=74966


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    The development of international organisations is different to globalisation?

    And no, you couldnt put up video evidence of a world leader saying something he's never said on YouTube.

    Economic globalisation is to do with trade and is handled by international organisations such as the WTO and the IMF but the main bulk of it takes place between suppliers and consumers. Have you ever bough anything that wasn't produced in Ireland or god forbid produced in far off exotic places like China. If so then welcome to the international conspiracy that is international trade OMFG :eek:. Don't forget to pick up your membership badge. That is all Gordon Brown was talking about.

    International relations generally means relations between the governments of nation states. The main institution in this field is the UN and it has very little to do with trade. It primarily deals with disputes over territory or other factors, but also human rights and relief aid. H.W. was talking about increasing the strength of international organisations such as the UN so they can better deal with conflict and strife around the globe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    sink wrote: »

    I wouldnt expect anyone that got an invite to this completely illegal meeting to tell me the truth. Do criminals lie? Yes.

    This link holds no weight, Ive never heard of the guy. Why dont press report it?

    Why did you have to get your link from Turkish Daily News? Shouldnt there be the minutes published in every news paper every year? We should be watching these kinds of events like hawks.
    The Queen of the Netherlands meets with Clintons, Bushes, Blairs, Kissengers, Rockefellas and for 2-3 days and no news report about it in Ireland?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭The Corinthian


    Here's a link for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    I wouldnt expect anyone that got an invite to this completely illegal meeting to tell me the truth. Do criminals lie? Yes.

    Under what law is it illegal?
    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    This link holds no weight, Ive never heard of the guy. Why dont press report it?

    Why did you have to get your link from Turkish Daily News? Shouldnt there be the minutes published in every news paper every year? We should be watching these kinds of events like hawks.
    The Queen of the Netherlands meets with Clintons, Bushes, Blairs, Kissengers, Rockefellas and for 2-3 days and no news report about it in Ireland?

    Don't forget Michael McDowell and Michael Martin, afaik they attended the 2007 meeting. It is kept private because politicians and business leaders want to speak frankly and they can't do that under the full glare of the worlds media. Minutes are not kept because it is an informal discussion. No decisions are made only ideas are traded openly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Shouldn't this be moved to the Conspiracy theories forum by now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Ah. Bilderberg...NWO...why has no-one mentioned the Guidestones!?


    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 153 ✭✭Smudgeyboy


    sink wrote: »
    Under what law is it illegal?



    Don't forget Michael McDowell and Michael Martin, afaik they attended the 2007 meeting. It is kept private because politicians and business leaders want to speak frankly and they can't do that under the full glare of the worlds media. Minutes are not kept because it is an informal discussion. No decisions are made only ideas are traded openly.
    It's illegal at least by American Constitution.


    Ok, so these people are all using the phrase New World Order and no variation right?

    "National Socialism with use it's own revolution in establishing a New World Order"- Adolf Hitler during WWII

    Adolf Hitler was apart of the Thule Society, a secret society and he joined in 1919, before he was elected.

    Now, the Bush family have used the phrase many times, as have all the leaders I listed with video evidence.

    The Bush family are heavily involved in the Skull and Bones society, another secret society. They are very very lucky in politics arent they? A family of presidents. In fact, GB Jnr's rival for his second election John Kerry also admitted to Skull and Bones...I wonder why he didnt ask for a recount after the controversy involving George's cousin in California?
    They both admitted it on the same show and get very edgey talking about it, funny clips. You can find on YouTube.

    Do the connection stop at political success, secret societys and using the same phrases? No! Prescott Bush even helped to fund Hitler! http://www.infowars.com/print_prescott.htm

    And what about actions? World conquest? Yes. Where Hitler failed with force, our current leaders are using incrementalism and fake democracy.

    To quote Joseph Stalin, Illuminati member "It doesnt matter who they vote for, they always vote for us"

    Oh if you think we're free of secret societys here you should check out Freemasonry and their funny handshakes.

    And you believe politicians? How are decisions not made if these people are all calling for a New World Order? When did they decide to do that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,316 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    It's illegal at least by American Constitution.


    Ok, so these people are all using the phrase New World Order and no variation right?

    "National Socialism with use it's own revolution in establishing a New World Order"- Adolf Hitler during WWII

    Adolf Hitler was apart of the Thule Society, a secret society and he joined in 1919, before he was elected.

    Now, the Bush family have used the phrase many times, as have all the leaders I listed with video evidence.

    The Bush family are heavily involved in the Skull and Bones society, another secret society. They are very very lucky in politics arent they? A family of presidents. In fact, GB Jnr's rival for his second election John Kerry also admitted to Skull and Bones...I wonder why he didnt ask for a recount after the controversy involving George's cousin in California?
    They both admitted it on the same show and get very edgey talking about it, funny clips. You can find on YouTube.

    Again, what in the american consitution says it's illegal?

    What variation would you like? Updated world order? New global order?

    Right so, let's say Hitler was in the NWO, how does that show anything?

    Kerry won in California. Are you retarded?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    Smudgeyboy wrote: »
    It's illegal at least by American Constitution.

    Really can you point to the article? You can find the full constitution at http://www.usconstitution.net/.

    The first amendment clearly states free speech and freedom to assemble are universal freedoms. At no point does it contravene those rights.


  • Advertisement
  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement