Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Which Laptop? (Kinda Narrowed The Choices Down To 2)

  • 15-09-2008 7:57pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 47


    Right, so I've searched quite extensively for a new laptop and it seems the best ones I could find for their price were:

    http://www.komplett.ie/k/ki.aspx?sku=375702

    (note that it has a free mouse and carrying case, which saves me some money from buying them myself)

    and

    http://www.laptopsdirect.ie/Toshiba_Satellite_P200-1K9_PSPB6E-1H702TEN/version.asp

    (BTW on the specs for this laptop, under graphics it says the card is a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 yet it goes on to say that this card is 512mb and afaik the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is only 256mb. Is it possible that the description is wrong and it's actually a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT which (I think) has 512mb?)

    To make it easier for people, here are the advantages of each of the laptops compared:

    First Link (MSI)

    -170 euro cheaper
    -Mouse and Carry Case included (which I will have to buy for the other one for approx 30 euro)
    -70GB more HDD (320GB vs. 250GB)
    -Lighter (2.6kg vs. 3.3kg)
    -Smaller

    Second Link (Toshiba)

    -More Cache (4MB vs. 2MB)
    -Better Processor (Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 / 2.4 GHz vs. AMD Turion 64 X2 mobile technology TL-60 ( Dual-Core ))
    -Bigger Screen (1440 x 900 ( WXGA+ ) vs. 15.4" TFT 1280 x 800 ( WXGA ))
    -More RAM (3GB installed with 4GB max. vs. 2GB installed with 2GB max.)

    Haven't really looked through the American sites out there as many of them don't seem to ship to here. The same goes for many of the U.K. ones.

    I can't decide whether the extra money on the second laptop is worth it for the extra specs. I know nobody here can read the future, but if it would be possible for someone to speculate whether the extra lifespan added by the specs is worth the extra cost?

    So basically what I'm asking is it better to splash out on better specs and keep the laptop for a longer time without buying a new one or is it better to buy one with more mediocre specs and upgrade to another mediocre specced laptop after a shorter length of time?

    Just in case anyone can recommend anything better I'll complete the form.



    1) What is your budget?

    Up to 900 euro approx.

    2) What size notebook would you prefer?

    15" - 17" screen would be good.

    3) Please select your country's flag as a post icon and tell us what country are you buying this in.

    Ireland. But I can get it shipped from abroad if the site ships internationally.

    4) Are there any brands that you prefer or any you really don't like?

    No!

    5) What tasks will you be performing with the notebook?

    College work, something in-between hardcore and casual gaming, general internet browsing, downloading.

    6) Will you be taking the notebook with you to different places or leaving it on your desk?

    Yes, I will be taking it with me to different places. Probably about 75% home usage. 25% outside usage.

    7) Will you be playing games on it; if so, which games?

    Yes. Right now, command and conquer 3 and WoW mostly. Although in the future I will probably be getting more new games as I am just entering into a period where I have more free time.

    8) How many hours of battery life do you need?

    2hrs+ or so should be good.

    9) Do you mind buying online without seeing the notebook in person?

    No!

    10) What OS do you prefer? Windows (XP or Vista), Mac OS, Linux, etc.

    Windows. Vista if possible.

    11) From the choices below, what screen resolutions would you prefer?

    All of them look ok to me. But WXGA or WXGA+ - 1280x768/800 or 1440x900; seems the best for me.

    12) Do you want a glossy/reflective screen or a matte/non-glossy screen?

    Not sure... no preference I guess, unless people can recommend one or the other to me.

    13) Are the notebook's looks and stylishness important to you?

    To some extent, but I'd prefer an ugly laptop with better specs than a stylish one with worse specs.

    14) When are you buying this laptop and how long do you want this laptop to last?

    Depends on how much I'm spending. Hopefully I'm not being unrealistic here, but with 800+ spent I'd expect a good 8 years lifetime and with 500 something more like 4-5 years might be reasonable.

    15) How much hard drive space do you want; 40GB to 500GB?

    120GB+ should pretty much cover me but the more the better.

    16) Do you need an optical drive? If yes, a CDRW/DVD-ROM, DVD Burner or Blu-Ray drive?

    They're not necessary for me, but they would be a nice feature to have.


    Thanks,
    Boink.

    p.s. can anyone let me know if cache size actually makes a significant difference to performance?


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    I'd go with the msi if I were you. The Toshiba has a much more powerful processor but you don't really need it so you should save yourself the few quid and the potential hassle with laptopsdirect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    +1, i would avoid laptops direct like the plague, and given that the msi is almost €200 less expensive, granted it's processor isn't quite as good as the toshiba but it is a 15.4" screen which'll make carrying it around a lot handier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭machalla


    I would second that, don't go near Laptops Direct. The worst after sales service/support I've ever had and I am including Dell in that. I think they actually topped NTL for my worst company to deal with ever!

    On the 15.4" vs 17" you will really feel the weght when lugging a 17" around. Apart from using it for development purposes I didn't get major value out of the bigger screen. I actually switched to a 13" screen after that and I haven't regretted it size wise.

    Whats the gfx card on the 15.4"? Just about anything out there now will run WOW but CC3 I would suspect could be a bit much for the average gfx card. Not sure as I haven't played it myself.

    Only other point is... Vista. Apart from on-going security I can't see the value of it at all. I found it slow and the graphical interface is annoying and gets in your way. I just turn off Aero and go back to classic. You have to turn off quite a few services to get acceptable performance out of it. My own machine was running 50% cpu (when idle!) until I turned off indexing and various other bits. Now its around 3% idle. XP was much less resource hungry.

    Each to their own though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 Boink08


    machalla wrote: »
    I would second that, don't go near Laptops Direct. The worst after sales service/support I've ever had and I am including Dell in that. I think they actually topped NTL for my worst company to deal with ever!

    On the 15.4" vs 17" you will really feel the weght when lugging a 17" around. Apart from using it for development purposes I didn't get major value out of the bigger screen. I actually switched to a 13" screen after that and I haven't regretted it size wise.

    Whats the gfx card on the 15.4"? Just about anything out there now will run WOW but CC3 I would suspect could be a bit much for the average gfx card. Not sure as I haven't played it myself.

    Only other point is... Vista. Apart from on-going security I can't see the value of it at all. I found it slow and the graphical interface is annoying and gets in your way. I just turn off Aero and go back to classic. You have to turn off quite a few services to get acceptable performance out of it. My own machine was running 50% cpu (when idle!) until I turned off indexing and various other bits. Now its around 3% idle. XP was much less resource hungry.

    Each to their own though.

    The gfx card on the 15.4" is also a radeon mobility 2600 HD. The main thing that's stopping me from buying the MSI is the fear that with such a low power processor (which would be v difficult for me to upgrade) and only 2GB RAM max it would become obsolete in a short amount of time and then I would have to get a new laptop after only a few years use...


  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boink08 wrote: »
    The gfx card on the 15.4" is also a radeon mobility 2600 HD. The main thing that's stopping me from buying the MSI is the fear that with such a low power processor (which would be v difficult for me to upgrade) and only 2GB RAM max it would become obsolete in a short amount of time and then I would have to get a new laptop after only a few years use...

    any laptop is only going to last 3 to 4 years max anyway before it starts failing.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement