Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

basic C++ question

  • 04-09-2008 9:14pm
    #1
    123abcd1983
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12 ✭


    can * operator can be overloaded to perform division?


Comments

  • #2
    Wcool
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 640 ✭✭✭Wcool


    why don;t you write a small program to test your questions?
    or are you following a written course in English???


  • #3
    toiletduck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭toiletduck


    123abcd1983 wrote: »
    can * operator can be overloaded to perform division?

    Yes.


    :pac:


  • #4
    unpure
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5 ✭unpure


    * operator is loaded to perform division by default, just include <cstdio>, <cstdlib> and <iostream>.
    Or do you mean used externally in runtime?
    (in which case yes)


  • #5
    marco_polo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    For me the fact that anyone can, or would want to, change the meaning of the universal symbol of multipication (*) to be a division operator using operator overloading sums up everything that is wrong with the concept IMO. Nice idea but far too often misused in reality.


  • #6
    toiletduck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭toiletduck


    Personally I find it operator overloading invaluable. What's puzzling me is why the OP didn't try it out first before asking here....


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    kayos
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,494 ✭✭✭kayos


    toiletduck wrote: »
    Personally I find it operator overloading invaluable. What's puzzling me is why the OP didn't try it out first before asking here....

    Its called getting others to do his homework for him.


  • #8
    toiletduck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭toiletduck


    Man I wish I had homework as easy as that back in the day :pac:


  • #9
    marco_polo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    toiletduck wrote: »
    Personally I find it operator overloading invaluable. What's puzzling me is why the OP didn't try it out first before asking here....

    Don't get me wrong used appropriatly it is a powerful and tool in a developers arsenal but quite regularly I have see it misused. Can you honestly say would you like to be the guy maintaining a codebase where a divided by b is written as a * b? No thanks :)


  • #10
    unpure
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5 ✭unpure


    * operator is loaded to perform division by default, just include <cstdio>, <cstdlib> and <iostream>.
    Or do you mean used externally in runtime?
    (in which case yes)

    EDIT: * is multiplication.
    My misread.


  • #11
    FruitLover
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭FruitLover


    You can drive a car with your feet if you like. Doesn't make it a good idea.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement