Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A bit of historical context.

  • 02-09-2008 1:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,713 ✭✭✭


    Just happened across this as a result of a conversation about ortho paper in cameras and various techniques people used to use in order to get round the limitations of slow ortho film. This lead to a discussion about Henry Peach Robinson. Turns out people were having arguments about HDR and Photoshop back in 1860 :-)

    Here's a historical precis .. http://www.rleggat.com/photohistory/history/robinson.htm

    "when, in 1860, Robinson outlined his methods at a meeting of the Photographic Society of Scotland, he was greeted with howls of protest from people who seemed to feel that they had been deceived. There was much discussion about what one correspondent referred to as "Patchwork", rather than composition"

    And a bunch of the pictures ...

    http://www.museumsyndicate.com/artist.php?artist=262


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭sheesh


    However, in "Pictorial Effect in Photography" (1867), a major literary work, Robinson wrote:

    "Any dodge, trick and conjuration of any kind is open to the photographer's use.... It is his imperative duty to avoid the mean, the base and the ugly, and to aim to elevate his subject.... and to correct the unpicturesque....A great deal can be done and very beautiful pictures made, by a mixture of the real and the artificial in a picture."

    excellently put

    In 1867!!!:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,185 ✭✭✭nilhg


    Thanks for that, just shows nothing really changes.

    The pages of Amateur Photographer must have been the equivalent of internet forums back then.


    I liked this quote

    "Purely as a light incidental comment, Robinson married in 1859, his wife recalling in later years that when they were married, she had been told in no unequivocal terms that it must be "photography first, wife afterwards", so she may have the distinction of being the first recorded photographic widow! "

    They made men of sterner stuff back then, never get away with that now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,713 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    I have a photography book from 1900 (actually called 'photography in a nutshell' !) which actually has a chapter on combining negatives of skies and grounds to make a print. It advised photographers to collect a library of sky negatives and choose one for the skies in their final picture to convey the mood they wanted for the scene.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Calina


    so some things never change then.... :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,713 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    Calina wrote: »
    so some things never change then.... :-)

    Sure looks that way ... so the next time someone gives out about something 'not being photography' you can tell them people were doing exactly the same thing back in 1860 :-)

    Although of course maybe you could counter that even in 1860 it just wasn't photography :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement