Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Insulated Slab

  • 26-08-2008 10:19pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8


    Is the benefit to be gained in installing 50 mm insulated slab over 38mm slab very significant?Is it worth the extra cost? Insulation in cavity wall is 60mm kingspan.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭sinnerboy


    Yes . In a detached house ( assume this is your case ) the single biggest surface are of the building through which heat escapes is usually the external wall .

    The extra thickness of insulation take you from a u value of 0.19 to 0.17
    This is probably the easiest upgrade to your spec you can make - far easier than assessing the m+e spec ( solar/HRV/heat pump/ condensing boiler etc )

    And unlike any of the m+e kit - the investment an additional insulation will not require on going maintenence and eventual replacement .

    For a more complete answer , tailored to your project you should engage a BER assessor


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    folks,

    i have 60 mm in the cavity aswell,

    i have now being told that i should pump the remaing 40mm as it would be better than dry lining,

    ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭sinnerboy


    Basic difficulty is that you can't visually check that the pumped in insulation is filling all the cavity everywhere

    In high exposure areas - coastal for example or in highlands there is a risk of water pentration when you "lose" the cavity

    Many certified systems insist on a min 50mm cavity

    Now I'm not saying don't do it - just be aware of the pitfalls .

    I admit I have no personal experience of using pumped in insulation


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,170 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    sinnerboy wrote: »
    Basic difficulty is that you can't visually check that the pumped in insulation is filling all the cavity everywhere

    In high exposure areas - coastal for example or in highlands there is a risk of water pentration when you "lose" the cavity

    Many certified systems insist on a min 50mm cavity

    Now I'm not saying don't do it - just be aware of the pitfalls .

    I admit I have no personal experience of using pumped in insulation


    I have seen a cavity that has 60mm board insulation + 40-50mm of blown in bead insulation. To be honest, only that the price to do this is somewhat economical, i wouldnt be a huge lover of it. The beads certainly do not form an additional 'board' layer and appear to be very haphazard regards to filling the cavity. They join to gether with a glue like substance, but the beads still remain 'squishy' if that makes sense.

    I have also seen blown in rockwool and in my opinion this would be a better product. Its pumped in under much higher pressures and this alone means that more area will be filled.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 495 ✭✭ardara1


    gally74 wrote: »
    folks,

    i have 60 mm in the cavity aswell,

    i have now being told that i should pump the remaing 40mm as it would be better than dry lining,

    ?

    Lets do the maths.

    you have a 40mm airspace there with a resistance of worst case 0.18 if it's an AEROBOARD EPS type insulaiton (Better if its a foiled insulation)

    0.18 resistance is the same as 7mm of pumped insulation - so infact you will only gain 33mm of pumed insulation in reality. 33mm of bead or fibre pumped is the same as adding 18mm of Polyiso to the inside if it's directly on the wall - 13mm if you put it on dabs.

    We're talking insignificant amounts of insulaiton here which ever way you choose.

    If you're going to do it correctly add 50mm of insulation internally (reduced at window reveals etc) and make sure it's well sealed.

    By the way - I don't think that the pumped insulaiton is allowed below 50mm cavity - doesn't fill properly. Be wary of filling the cavity of you have facing brick also.

    HAVE YOU LOOKED INTO YOUR ROOF SPACE FIRST OF ALL? - Get plenty of fibre up there first.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,170 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    gally, assuming you have 50mm epanded polystyrene in your cavity...
    you existing wall u value is 0.56 :eek:

    this assumes 20 render, 100 block, 50 cavity, 50 insulation, 100 block, internal skim.

    if you pump the remaining approx 50mm with bonded bead this brings the u value down to approx 0.36

    if you leave what you have in the cavity and insulate internally with 62.5 composite plasterboard (50mm insulation and 12.5 plaster) then your wall u value drops to 0.3

    You should be aiming to reach 0.27 anyway.....

    when costs, degree of work, interruption to life etc are taken into account.... this are the factors you need to think about when choosing..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    thanks all folks, yer the best espically syd,

    had an insulation guy out the other day. im off to the show in the RDS tomorrow.

    the insualtion is 60mm kingspan, i spoke to this chap about air tightness as i am defiently going for heat recovery.

    so heres my options,

    HRV + dry line exterior walls, 300mm in attic,

    HRV + air tightness, 300mm in attic,

    im starting to think option 2 is the way,

    P

    p


Advertisement