Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Linux install (No CD-Rom, no USB key)

  • 25-08-2008 7:57am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭


    Hey guys,
    I'm doing a bit of travelling at the moment, and figured I may as well get back into linux and install a distro for a bit of practice, and possibly something for my CV. I've used fedora, ubuntu, red hat and mandrake before, but only for very short periods, so I'd definately still class myself as a beginner.

    Now, I never had any problems installing above mentioned distros, however, I always had a CD. Now, I have nothing. Like I said, I'm travelling so can't exactly go next door to a mates and borrow and external CD Drive, and I also do not have a USB or pen drive.

    My question is, can I still install Linux (dual boot) without the above equipment?

    Also, any recommendations for distros? When I used Ubuntu, I liked it, but thought it had way too much extra apps that I didn't need/use. My understanding is that its built on fedora but auto installs every app available on the disc, as opposed to the fedora install that lets you tick whatever you want.

    I've already actually got my hands on the latest Ubuntu ISO so may just stick with that, unless advised otherwise, so really, all I need help with is the install itself.

    Any ideas?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭stereo_steve


    Download ubuntu.

    Get a windows program to mount .iso files and then install from within windows using wubi. Wubi is very straight forward and you will see it when you mount the iso.

    Installing via will give you a slight performance drop but you don't have to do any partitioning etc

    Good luck, any questions just pop them up here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭The_B_Man


    Well I kinda wanted to have a separate partition for the install. AFAIK theres issues with NTFS and stuff, and I havent got a decent enough laptop for VMware.

    also, i just realised I have a Nintendo DS with a TopToy DS....which has a 8gb memory card in it!! I also have a USB cardreader that I can PROBABLY use to boot off the card.

    If I mount the Ubuntu iso, will it let me create a separate partition? Or will it only let me install in the Windows partition? (ps is that method the one that just uses the huge single file, that your boot.ini points to?)

    /off topic:
    pps, i just heard snoring from up in a TREE beside me. I shined a torch at it and it stopped snoring.....rustling ensues and a big huge bat the size of an eagle comes flyin at me!! Ah, I love travelling Oz in a camper van!! Lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭niallb


    You won't even need to mount the ubuntu iso. (It must be the "Desktop ISO")
    If you put it in the same directory as wubi.exe and run it, it'll do everything else.
    It really is your best bet, and if you have the space, offers far less chance of
    hosing your windows install under the circumstances.

    Sure, it'll be in a couple of big files on your windows partition, but if you can't
    think of a way of installing linux on a no CD, no USB laptop using only your
    swiss army knife while hanging upside down from the tree with your other hand,
    you'll hardly notice that for now.

    The NTFS issues were largely very specific, and when installed this way,
    linux is NOT writing files to an NTFS partition, it's using a single file of fixed size
    as a seperate filesystem. This sidesteps the problems that used to exist.
    In addition, linux ntfs support has come on vastly in the last few years.

    You should also be able to copy the contents of the ISO file to the cardreader with the DS card in it.
    Search for unetbootin for a tool which will help with that, and also allows installation to disk.
    Have fun.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭GreenHell


    I'd go with VMware to be honest. Ubuntu should run fine with 512 meg of ram. Won't be the fastest thing in the world, but certainly the easiest to setup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭niallb


    GreenHell wrote: »
    I'd go with VMware to be honest. Ubuntu should run fine with 512 meg of ram. Won't be the fastest thing in the world, but certainly the easiest to setup.

    I'm guessing here you haven't seen wubi recently!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 580 ✭✭✭karlr42


    niallb wrote: »
    The NTFS issues were largely very specific, and when installed this way,
    linux is NOT writing files to an NTFS partition, it's using a single file of fixed size
    as a seperate filesystem. This sidesteps the problems that used to exist.
    In addition, linux ntfs support has come on vastly in the last few years.
    I dual boot Ubuntu with XP, and used to have a Wubi installation, and I have to agree that NTFS support is great nowadays. Never have any trouble reading/writing to my NTFS partition from Ubuntu, as long as XP was properly shut down last time it was used.

    If you choose Wubi, bear in mind you can't hard-shutdown Windows or Ubuntu, it can screw up the installation, and you can't use hibernation in Ubuntu either. Those were the two most annoying issues I had with my Wubi installation, so just a heads-up


Advertisement