Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

COMPUTERS NEED TV LICENSES?

  • 09-08-2008 9:02pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 562 ✭✭✭


    just looking on rte's website at the moment and you can actually watch rte on the web, does that mean you need a tv license for a computer?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    dont tempt them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭entropi


    If it has the ability to play movies or tv programmes then yes, legally you need one but they cannot enforce it as a computer is not officially designed to do those things, just have them as features.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,162 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/consumer-affairs/media/tv_licences
    You do not require a television licence to watch television on your computer or mobile phone. However, you do require a licence if the computer is used together with any other apparatus to receive a signal.
    I think that means that if it has a tv tuner card then it needs a tv lisense.

    Moved from After Hours.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 562 ✭✭✭utick


    well if ya can watch rte online and get away without paying a license, thats a nice little loophole. im not sure but i think the law says anything that can receive a radio signal needs a license, so just stay away from wireless and you may be fine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,814 ✭✭✭BaconZombie


    IIRC you need one in the UK {don't konw about Ireland} if you have ANY device capable of receiving a TV signal, this includes Mobiles and Computers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,847 ✭✭✭✭cormie


    BOFH_139 wrote: »
    IIRC you need one in the UK {don't konw about Ireland} if you have ANY device capable of receiving a TV signal, this includes Mobiles and Computers.

    You need a TV tuner to receive a signal on a computer. If you're laptop/PC doesn't have one, and you don't have any other device capable of such in your house, then you don't need a license.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    cormie wrote: »
    You need a TV tuner to receive a signal on a computer. If you're laptop/PC doesn't have one, and you don't have any other device capable of such in your house, then you don't need a license.

    If your Tv doesn't have a AV tuner then you don't need a license either. Until you pick up one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    You can also include some of the Nokia N series phones that can stream TV, Your TV license inspector will have some fun trying to track down phone users that subscribe to these services :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,378 ✭✭✭Krieg


    http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/consumer-affairs/media/tv_licences

    I think that means that if it has a tv tuner card then it needs a tv lisense.

    qft

    I asked this before in the law forum
    But I have little doubt that the "tv" licence will soon expand to include computers regardless of capabilities. Since its becoming more easy and common to watch stuff through the computer


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,162 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Doesn't the lisense cover a household? e.g. You can have two or more tvs but you still only pay the lisense fee once. If so then there isn't really a problem seeing as the vast majority of houses have tvs.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Krieg wrote: »
    qft

    I asked this before in the law forum
    But I have little doubt that the "tv" licence will soon expand to include computers regardless of capabilities. Since its becoming more easy and common to watch stuff through the computer
    There are many people who wouldn't bother having a TV (In cluding myself) but would look at news and documentary programmes streamed on line. I have no intention of getting a TV license if I don't have a TV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,581 ✭✭✭uberwolf


    The Minister responsible has expressly said that the requirement for a license will not extend to computers. As I recall, the rationale was so as not to hamper the uptake of technologies. Conveniently I can't find a reference for this, but it was in recent months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭10-10-20


    My understanding of the law is that any device which is capable of receiving & decoding television signals over the conventional methods of cable, satellite or wireless, require a licence.

    This covers computers which have a TV card installed.

    The gap here is that this does not cover situations where the TV signal is broadcast through encapsulating packets - such as over a network. Hence, what uberwolf said - this will be tightened up later on. But, the device which decodes encapsulates and then broadcasts the signal, will require a licence.

    The hole here is that in effect, the distribution of TV signals over a network, where a specific hardware device for decoding TV signals is not used, does not require a licence For example, if you are using a standard network card and a software application to decode the TV signal.

    Clear..?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    they wont do you for streaming video. for one that would be silly and I'd beat a postman over the head and keep him in the back of my van a la Lock Stock.

    Second your ISP is transmitting the signal, technically speaking, and you pay them good money to transmit it. Its not the domestic television signal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭decob


    This was in todays business post about the tv license law


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,847 ✭✭✭✭cormie


    Jeez, just read that, what a joke! Funnily enough I'm in the clear. I've a projector and a laptop without a tuner. So, a BIG screen and no need for a license. But yet I've already had two letters from an post saying the inspector called and nobody answered (when I did, both times) and that if I'm in posession of a tv I'll be fined:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,010 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    decob wrote: »
    This was in todays business post about the tv license law

    At a guess I would say that this
    A television set, without an aerial, satellite or cable connection or other means of receiving a TV signal, still requires a TV licence; it is the TV box, and not the TV connection, which invokes the licence.

    is wide open to being appealed in court since it implies that tv's are responsible for the license and not the signal which is a farce. Nobody should be charged for a tv license is they are incapable of utilising what the license is for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,529 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    In Germany you're already required to have a TV licence to receive TV programming via Internet streaming whether you have a TV tuner card or not.


Advertisement