Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Kate McCann police interview

  • 05-08-2008 5:21pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,496 ✭✭✭


    This is a tad disturbing. After Madeline's disappearance and they became suspects, the McCanns were interviewed. Kate answered only one of the questions
    By Sam Marsden


    Tuesday August 05 2008

    Kate McCann refused to answer 48 questions put to her by Portuguese detectives after she was made a suspect in Madeleine's disappearance, the police files reveal.

    She used her right as an "arguido'', or formal suspect, to remain silent during this section of her interview on September 7 last year.

    Officers quizzed her about everything from her medical specialism and Madeleine's behaviour to whether she had any responsibility for the little girl's vanishing.

    DOSSIER

    Detectives started by asking Mrs McCann about her movements immediately after she discovered that her daughter was missing at about 10pm on May 3 last year, a document in the massive police dossier shows.

    She was asked where she looked, what she touched and whether she searched inside the master bedroom's wardrobe.

    Officers asked Mrs McCann general questions about her relationship with her children and her work. The 40th question was: "Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children's behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?"

    It was followed by: "Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine's custody to a relative?"

    The final unanswered question was: "Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter's disappearance?"

    The files show that the only question Mrs McCann did answer was: "Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?''

    She replied: "Yes, if that's what the investigation thinks.''

    Mrs McCann has always strenuously denied any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance and her arguido status was lifted on July 21.

    source http://www.herald.ie/world-news/kate-mccann-stayed-silent-when-asked-48-questions-by-police-1446855.html


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭Plug


    I don't think anyone cares anymore.
    Her daughter is dead, end of.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,316 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    The Herald is a rag. The woman had the right to remain silent and she did. Her silence means nothing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Anything you say in an interview can and will be used against you. Oddly enough, no police force tries to twist things (like for example genuine memory lapses) into a positive thing for you. The Portugese police turned on them only toward the end and seem to be looking for scapegoats, and the McCann's would have been advised by a lawyer to use the law to protect themselves.
    What's disturbing about that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,365 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    To be honest I wouldn't tell those incompetant pigs anything either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    spurious wrote: »
    The Herald is a rag. The woman had the right to remain silent and she did. Her silence means nothing.

    +1. If this kind of news had become known a year ago they would have put a completely different spin on it. "Portugese police force waste valuable time questioning innocent English mum while real killer is still at large".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    And if she was questioned just after the disappearance, she could still be in shock, or she could simply be disgusted with the fact that the cops seemed to be implying that she was behind it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    humanji wrote: »
    And if she was questioned just after the disappearance, she could still be in shock, or she could simply be disgusted with the fact that the cops seemed to be implying that she was behind it.

    I think this interview took place when she was named as an arguido which was a good while after the kid disappeared IIRC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Kold


    Plug wrote: »
    I don't think anyone cares anymore.
    Her daughter is dead, end of.

    This.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,330 ✭✭✭Gran Hermano


    Boggles wrote: »
    To be honest I wouldn't tell those incompetant pigs anything either.

    Does the incompetency extend to those who didn't bother getting a babysitter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    javaboy wrote: »
    I think this interview took place when she was named as an arguido which was a good while after the kid disappeared IIRC.
    Ah right. I read this:
    Detectives started by asking Mrs McCann about her movements immediately after she discovered that her daughter was missing at about 10pm on May 3 last year, a document in the massive police dossier shows.

    to mean that they interviewed her immediately after Maddie disappeared. Still, if she was named a suspect I can understand how she'd be pissed off enough to not want to answer questions. Her answer to the one question she answered kind of points to this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    humanji wrote: »
    Still, if she was named a suspect I can understand how she'd be pissed off enough to not want to answer questions. Her answer to the one question she answered kind of points to this.

    True. It's easy for us (or the Daily Mail Herald) to stand back and say she should have answered because it would be simpler and would let the police get back to business. But maybe in her position we would be so furious, indignant and outraged that we wouldn't be thinking straight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,494 ✭✭✭ronbyrne2005


    Don't trust them. Kid's probably dead and I don't think it was a paedo ring or a kidnapper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    javaboy wrote: »
    True. It's easy for us (or the Daily Mail Herald) to stand back and say she should have answered because it would be simpler and would let the police get back to business. But maybe in her position we would be so furious, indignant and outraged that we wouldn't be thinking straight.
    Or pissed off that they were on to us. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭stevelknievel


    Are we all forgetting about the DNA in the back of the car or was that explained? I kinda lost interest in this story about a year ago. I reckon they're guilty of manslaughter and the cover up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    humanji wrote: »
    Still, if she was named a suspect I can understand how she'd be pissed off enough to not want to answer questions. Her answer to the one question she answered kind of points to this.

    I'm sure if I killed someone I'd be fairly pissed off to be caught too.

    At the end of the day , if the parents werent at the very least questioned about it, there woudl be something seriously wrong. In the absence of any eveidence pointing to anyone else, she knew she was goign to be suspected.
    Seachmall wrote: »

    It left a bad taste in my mouth though:(


    From the laughing?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The DNA could not be verified as Madelines.
    As for the complete investigation - the police appear to have gone against the procedures used by most 'advanced' police forces around the world in terms of finding missing persons.
    Personally I have my thoughts as to what happened to the poor girl.
    However, reading something in the Herald and using that as a basis for what I presume is a serious discussion is follish!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,832 ✭✭✭littlebug


    The Mc Cann's being made arguidos was based on a report from the FSS in birmingham saying that a sample found in the car was a partial match to Madeleine. In a second report they said that yes the DNA was a partial match but it was also a partial match to millions of other people including some people who worked in the FSS. The portuguese police chose to ignore this.

    I can't help but think that that wee girl could still be out there somewhere or at the very least her killer is still out there having got off with it... or any number of possibilities in between ... but there you go, that's just my opinion... each to their own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Stekelly wrote: »
    From the laughing?

    You know when you here a sick joke that leaves a look on your face as if you just tasted something bad.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    She's not out there somewhere. Not breathing anyway.
    it sucks, but there you go. That's just the way it is.
    And I don't reckon the Mc. Canns did it either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Seachmall wrote: »
    You know when you here a sick joke that leaves a look on your face as if you just tasted something bad.

    Thats your soul trying to escape because you are evil. :D

    The sick ones are the funniest though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭shenanigans1982


    I don't think anybody really cares about this any more....even the scumbag taxi drivers who had pics of her up in their cars seem to have taken them down.

    At least having to explain to their other kids how their stupidity resulted in their daughters death is some kind of punishment for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    I don't think anybody really cares about this any more....even the scumbag taxi drivers who had pics of her up in their cars seem to have taken them down.

    At least having to explain to their other kids how their stupidity resulted in their daughters death is some kind of punishment for them.

    Yep indeed never mind the fact that when said daughters grow up and have kids on their own cant see them sleeping over at the grandparents much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Tha Gopher


    Interesting to see the UK media has taken little or no interest in this.


    The McCanns are an awful pair of people. Wish the media would have the balls to ask them another question- where the **** is all the donated money gone?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭eVeNtInE


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    The Herald is a disgusting piece of filth. Don't indulge it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,440 ✭✭✭GirlInterrupted


    A transcript of an interview can't convey the attitude of the police questioner, or the tone of their voice. She was probably confronted by a very judgemental and agressive demeanour.

    That said, the McCanns are very definitely guilty of neglect at least, but they have paid the highest price possible for it.

    They also come across as very cold and calculating, but I could be misinterpreting the numbness and guilt that they undoubtedly feel. They are defensive for a reason, they know they let their little girl down.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    A transcript of an interview can't convey the attitude of the police questioner, or the tone of their voice. She was probably confronted by a very judgemental and agressive demeanour.

    That said, the McCanns are very definitely guilty of neglect at least, but they have paid the highest price possible for it.

    They also come across as very cold and calculating, but I could be misinterpreting the numbness and guilt that they undoubtedly feel. They are defensive for a reason, they know they let their little girl down.
    or maybe Mrs. McC. can't speak Portuguese and the policemen can't speak English!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Seeing as the Portugeese police were so unable to do some real police work and instead tried to make an easier charge stick on the parents, I'd say she was totally correct to not answer.

    If it was your kid that was abducted and the police were just trying to find a way to blame it on you, then wouldn't you do the same?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Are we all forgetting about the DNA in the back of the car or was that explained?
    DNA is shared by family members no?

    And this isn't news. It's August - the time of year when there is no news...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    I don't think anybody really cares about this any more....even the scumbag taxi drivers who had pics of her up in their cars seem to have taken them down.

    I was as bewildered as anybody at the whole Have You Seen 'Maddie'? hysteria but where's the basis for calling the taxi drivers with her picture up scumbags?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    Dave! wrote: »
    The Herald is a disgusting piece of filth. Don't indulge it.

    Eh it was in the Daily Mail too you know. Along with the first exclusive pictures of the bed where she spent her last night of sleep!

    You wouldn't consider the Daily Mail to be a disgusting piece of filth now would you? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,240 ✭✭✭hussey


    javaboy wrote: »
    I was as bewildered as anybody at the whole Have You Seen 'Maddie'? hysteria but where's the basis for calling the taxi drivers with her picture up scumbags?

    I assume he was just calling taxi drivers scumbags in general.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,094 ✭✭✭✭javaboy


    hussey wrote: »
    I assume he was just calling taxi drivers scumbags in general.

    Sweeping generalisations on AH alert! Tell Commissioner Gordon to turn on the Dudess signal. This city needs a hero.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,715 ✭✭✭marco murphy


    Lol what gets me is the Sky News sensationalism

    ''The McCanns have been made Arguidos, which is suspect in Portugal''

    Which then makes it way on here. Just say suspect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭shenanigans1982


    javaboy wrote: »
    I was as bewildered as anybody at the whole Have You Seen 'Maddie'? hysteria but where's the basis for calling the taxi drivers with her picture up scumbags?


    It has nothing to do with them having her picture up....doesn't everybody who is not a taxi driver call them scumbags?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    It has nothing to do with them having her picture up....doesn't everybody who is not a taxi driver call them scumbags?
    Hey, they stay sober so you don't have to :mad:, show some respect:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,167 ✭✭✭Notorious


    Seeing as the Portugeese police were so unable to do some real police work and instead tried to make an easier charge stick on the parents, I'd say she was totally correct to not answer.

    It was you all along, wasn't it?


Advertisement