Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Great Rake Race: PL Omaha vs NL Hold'em

  • 03-08-2008 8:55pm
    #1
    coillcam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭


    I had a good search through 2p2 and couldn't find any info.

    Basically what is the difference in omaha and holdem in terms of relative rake paid?

    Assuming that you are adequately rolled and your respective winrates are more or less the same. That there are plenty of tables available and your ability to multi-table is not compromised.

    Obviously you will play more pots in omaha and more of them go to showdown as a result= more rake.

    I was wondering about this anyway is it worth playing omaha over holdem as result of having a healthy rebate scheme?


Comments

  • #2
    Lafortezza
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,806 ✭✭✭Lafortezza


    I'd assume that because most omaha players VPIP is higher than holdem players, that you would pay more rake playing omaha because you see more flops. But omaha is slower so you wouldn't play as many hands.


  • #3
    RoundTower
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭RoundTower


    that, basically

    if you can play the same number of hands per hour you are paying more rake at PLO


Advertisement