Official World Golf Rankings - biased?

JerryHandbag

I must admit I cant make sense out of these rankings....they seem to be so biased towards the USA golfers. Last yr, Harrington was about 12th going into the Open, and after he won i was sure hed go to number 3 or 4....but he came in at 7th, and Steve Stricker, who had spent about 10 yrs in the doldrums was 4th! And hes still in the top 10 at number 8! Again just last week I threw my eyes to heaven when i saw Anthony Kim ranked above Harrington at number 13....yeah sure hes won twice this year, but then so has Graeme MacDowell and you dont see him in the top 15 of the world....it just seems that the americans just have to win a tournament or 2 to get high up the rankings, while the europeans have to be consistent over a few years to get an equal position.....to be honest Im amazed Kenny Perry isnt number 2 now just behind the tigger! Its all baffling to me

copacetic

The points are based on the field at a particular tornament. If you place well in a field with say 15 out of the world top 20 it is obviously a lot better relatively than winning a tournament with no-one from the top 20 in it. Kims wins are worth way more points than McDowells because of the field quality. The site is pretty good, it explains exactly how it all works and shows the points earned for everyone and how the reduce over time in the running total.

madds

Picked this up from www.officialworldgolfranking.com

The Official World Golf Ranking, which is endorsed by the four Major Championships and the six professional tours which make up the International Federation of PGA Tours, is issued every Monday, following the completion of the previous week’s tournaments from around the world.

The official events from the six professional tours together with the Canadian, Nationwide and European Challenge Tours are all taken into account and “Ranking Points” are awarded according to the players’ finishing positions and are generally related to the strength of the field based on the number and ranking of the Top-200 World Ranked players and the Top-30 of the Home Tour players in the respective tournaments (Event “Rating Values”). However, the four Major Championships are rated separately to reflect the higher quality of the events together with the Players Championship in the United States. In addition, the BMW PGA Championship in Europe, the Australian, Japan and South African Open Championships and the Flagship events on the Asian and Nationwide Tours are allocated higher minimum points levels to reflect their status.

The World Ranking Points for each player are accumulated over a two year “rolling” period with the points awarded for each event maintained for a 13-week period to place additional emphasis on recent performances – ranking points will then be reduced in equal decrements for the remaining 91 weeks of the two year Ranking period. Each player is then ranked according to his average points per tournament, which is determined by dividing his total number of points by the tournaments he has played over that two-year period. There is a minimum divisor of 40 tournaments over the two year ranking period.

The winners of the Masters Tournament, the US Open Championship, the Open Championship and the PGA Championship are awarded 100 points (60 points for 2nd place, 40 for 3rd, 30 for 4th down to 1.50 points for a player completing the final round), and the winner of the Players Championship is awarded 80 points (points are awarded down to 1.20 points for 60th place and ties). The BMW PGA Championship has a minimum 64 points for the winner (points to 56th place). Minimum points levels for the winners of official Tour events have been set at 6 points for the Canadian Tour (points to 6th place), 12 points for the European Challenge Tour (points to 14th place), 14 points for the Asian, Sunshine and Nationwide Tours (points to 17th place), 16 points for Australasian and Japanese Tours (points to 19th place) and 24 points for European and the United States Tours (points to 27th place). In addition the Open Championships of Australia, Japan and South Africa have a minimum of 32 points for the winner (points to 37th place) and the Flagship events on the Asian and Nationwide Tours have a minimum of 20 points for the winner (points to 22nd place). In the cases of co-sanctioned Tour events, the minimum points levels are determined using the “average” of the minimum Tour ranking points from each Tour (rounded up to nearest whole number).

Points are reduced by 25% for tournaments curtailed to 36 holes because of inclement weather or other reasons.

madds

Here's an excellent article from today's IT on how Paddy can become No. 2 in the world and even No. 1 by the time the 2009 Masters comes round - Becoming world's best is not a mad fantasy

I can post the entire article if required, but it's quite long.

JerryHandbag

Great article...certainly debunks the theory that Woods can take 2 years off and still be number 1! Great chance for paddy to close the gap..