Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Large Hadron Collider, Hell Yeah!

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    King Mob wrote: »
    Is there a danger or is it just more ignorant scare mongers trying to slow science?
    There's a chance that the LHC could create something dangerous, but the chances of that happening are similar to the chances of your desk suddenly morphing into a cow, and for much the same reasons.

    Most of the doomsday talk has been by people who are unfamiliar with the strange world of quantum mechanics and can therefore be forgiven for being wrong, even if they cannot be forgiven for flapping their arms about, shouting and generally behaving in a panicky fashion.

    The main thing to remember is that the earth's upper atmosphere has already been subject to cosmic rays which are tens of thousands of times more energetic than anything the LHC will be able to produce, and it has been subject to them since the earth was formed. The chances that the LHC's relatively low-energy gear will produce something that hasn't happened before are therefore minimal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 120 ✭✭stabu


    It's all about marketing, and though some of the words are comfortingly esoteric, Higg's Boson, etc., but I think "strangelet" was a bad choice. Bad branding.

    If that thing is producing things called strangelets, what would you expect public reaction to be?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,753 ✭✭✭fitz0


    Yeah strangelets sound too ambiguous. They should rename them explodelets! or Godlets or somesuch.

    In all seriousness though Im very interested to see what the outcome of the experiments done with the LHC will be. What will they find? And if there is a giant catastrophic implosion that destroys the earth and sucks us all into a vortex of unimaginable horror then at least it will be interesting and (in my mind) filled with pretty swirling colours.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 857 ✭✭✭davros


    I haven't been keeping up with physics lately so 'strangelet' is a new term for me. But I do remember that strange quarks were paired with charm quarks. So if anyone is concerned about strangelets just tell them that charmlets must be right around the corner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,681 ✭✭✭Standman


    Here's a short and very informative video on the subject:



    It's one of the TED Talks series. If ye haven't heard of them before check them out! They are like the toy show for intelligent grown-ups! There's a couple hundred video's on their youtube channel. When I discovered it I spent hours watching the vid's, they are really amazing:

    http://youtube.com/user/TEDtalksDirector


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭bus77


    First run set for October 21 of this year.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_21
    October 21 1879... Using a filament of carbonized thread, Thomas Edison tests the first practical electric incandescent light bulb (it lasted 13½ hours before burning out).


Advertisement