Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Tennis - Levine v Isner.

  • 09-07-2008 9:34am
    #1
    ArmaniJeanss
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,606 ✭✭✭✭


    Funny thread 'Levine v Isner In Play' on the Betfair Tennis Forum http://forum.betfair.com/

    Its about 20 pages at this stage but Cliff Notes from Lori will give you an idea.

    ***
    Scoreboard and odds didnt match up.

    People started betting thinking match was rigged/bot had gone mad

    Scoreboard went one way , odds went the other, about two people work it out and get laughed at

    People pile their banks on at about 1.10 on a guy who should be 1.01, much joking takes place about how they've just screwed someone out of their bankroll and how evil bots are.

    Game ends, much more mirth as they get paid out.

    Real result is found on another website.

    Lots of backtracking and panic.

    Payout is reversed, mugs who thought they were getting free money proceed to cry and whine for 600 posts

    ***


Comments

  • #2
    badbrian
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 384 ✭✭badbrian


    Interesting thread alright. A lot of repetition but. I concentrated on Dawsy who claimed to have put in £13k to win £2k or thereabouts. Claims to have been refunded now.
    My own opinion is that as BF provide the link to the scoreboard in order that people can bet they should be held in some way liable if that source is unreliable (i know they give Caveats). I'm sure it wouldn't affect their bottom line in any meaningful way. But having said that I wouldn't have backed it myself if the odds/score match up and clearly that was the case.
    Cheers!


Advertisement