[UK] Road rules 'set against' cyclists

Victor

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7478823.stm

Road rules 'set against' cyclists

Cyclists who break the law and ride anti-socially only do so because the "rules of the road" are set against them, a cyclists' campaigner has said.

CTC policy co-ordinator Chris Peck said it was important to ask why a minority of cyclists used pavements instead of the roads or went through red lights.

Mr Peck said CTC wanted to see road rules "rewritten" to help cyclists.

The AA said the behaviour of some cyclists effectively meant there were "two tribes" at war on the roads.

One mooted traffic law proposal is to introduce an advanced green stage at a junction which allows cyclists to get away before motorists.

Roger Geffen, CTC campaigns and policy manager, said: "We would like to see more one-way streets made two way for cyclists.

"This can be done, it works perfectly well at the moment in countries like Holland.

"Some people are just anti-social, and some drive cars and some ride bicycles."

Mr Geffen said residential areas should have 20mph speed limits and also called for cyclists to get more training to make them confident on the road.

"Cyclists are far more likely to be victims rather than perpetrators of irresponsible behaviour on the roads," he said.

Breaking rules

Mr Peck said: "Most cyclists obey the rules of the road, there is only a minority that cycle anti-socially, like breaking red lights and cycle on pavements but we have to realise why they are doing this.

"It's because the rules of the road are not set up for cyclists, the width of the roads, the layout of the roads, even cycle routes are not designed with the cyclists in mind, they are designed to keep cyclists off the road and mingle them with pedestrians."

Cycling is being promoted in English cities such as Bristol, with the government providing £140m of funding.

The rules are set to be changed at a local level, in London councils will soon get new powers to protect and prosecute cyclists.

Nick Lester, of lobby group and think tank London Councils, said: "We have got two powers, the first is to enable advance stop lines to be enforced to give cyclists the benefit at traffic signals.

"The second is better powers to control reckless footway cycling where cyclists can - and it's only a minority of cyclists - cause fear amongst pedestrians."

Edmund King, of the AA, said at times it appeared there were two tribes at war on the roads.

He said: "We do see cyclists just not obeying the rules of the road jumping red lights, one way streets, also we get motorists doing things that they shouldn't so maybe we need to clarify the rules for all."

oobydooby

There is definitely scope to improve the road rules to benefit cyclists, while not impeding other road traffic.

Off the top of my head:

1. Introduce 'Cyclist lights' at many traffic lights (permitting us to treat red light as a yield rather than a stop)

2. The ludicrous and dangerous obligatory cycle lane usage rule which is well documented.

3. Contra-flow lanes for cyclists in one-way systems (as in the article).

I know the Dublin Cycling Campaign is active on many of these. Out of curiosity, how many of us are members of the DCC here? I am, but I'm not in any way as active as I'd like to be. Impressed with their work and knowledge. Plenty of expertise around here too.

Pre-empting rants from certain trolling visitors (who should be banned IMHO): all road users should obey the law. It's there to protect us all. But it can be improved.