Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ComReg orders Eircom to slash LLU charge

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,660 ✭✭✭crawler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    So how much for the rack space, Electricity, Backhaul etc (paid to eircom) to use this now "economic" LLU. Or is it still more expensive than other European retail?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,660 ✭✭✭crawler


    watty wrote: »
    So how much for the rack space, Electricity, Backhaul etc (paid to eircom) to use this now "economic" LLU. Or is it still more expensive than other European retail?

    That would be covered in the WUA consultation Watty which is ongoing.

    http://www.comreg.ie/publications/consultation_-_market_analysis__wholesale_unbundled_access.583.103109.p.html


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Looks like a good first move, hope it will push more telcos to use LLU and for the existing LLU players to unbundle more exchanges and reduce their line rental (ahem, looking at you Smart).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭cgarvey


    So will LLU operators jump all over this, or still worry about long-term strategy around NGNs?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,660 ✭✭✭crawler


    Well lets see where it brings us....there is a lot of work still to be done on LLU on all sides (see WUA consutation for example). But this is a good first baby step.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭cgarvey


    crawler wrote: »
    this is a good first baby step.
    Yes, in fairness, it is.

    I hope WUA (and the various charges/timescales) all don't drag on too long to make the whole process meaningless (as I'm sure any NGN-related USOs will all have to be negotiated, and will, on current form, only be done AFTER eircom has gone a good bit down the road. Hopefully WUA won't drag on, so that at least low-hanging fruit exchanges can be LLUed with relative ease (and not just be a viable long term investment).

    A number of telcos have talked the talk on LLU pricing being the inhibitor (although whole or shared wasn't mentioned a whole lot), so lets see some walking the walk now!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The same WUA consultation where section 3.73 baldly states that eircom has "2.2m LINES" instead of 2.2m Access Channels.

    Why am I fearful when they make a fundamental mistake like that ?? :(


Advertisement