Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Photo of object - seems much further in photo than what I see myself?

  • 25-06-2008 7:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,914 ✭✭✭


    Hope someone can explain - if I take a photo of say a ship in the harbour - the photograph makes it look much further away than what I would perceive with my own vision... is this dependent on the type of lens or just a fact of life?

    hope I'm making sense!:o


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,852 ✭✭✭Hugh_C


    It's the lens. If you're using a wide lens, then objects will appear further away, if it's a long lens, then it'll appear closer. Read about it here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭City-Exile


    There's also the fact that you probably wouldn't be looking at the resultant picture in it's actual size. You'd print it smaller & reduce the size to view it on a screen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,914 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    thanks guys. The easiest way I can put it is that I was taking a photo of a ship docked in port from across the street (with an N95 phone) and what I was looking at visually was a huge ship but in the resulting photo the ship looked smaller than it should have - but I'm guessing this is because it was taking up a small proportion of the photo whereas my eyes were effectively focusing on the ship alone..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭City-Exile


    Did you try zooming in with the camera?
    The sensor on the N95 is tiny!
    Also, the lens is so short, so it will give you a very wide view.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,914 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    there's no optical zoom on the N95 so I didn't bother..
    think I'm copping on now to what you are saying about the lens being the thing that matters but what is a "short" lens i.e. is this related to , say, a 35mm lens on a normal digicam?

    and what denotes a long lens? In digital camera speak? Never realised until now how little I understood about photography!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 168 ✭✭leohoju


    City-Exile wrote: »
    Did you try zooming in with the camera?
    The sensor on the N95 is tiny!
    Also, the lens is so short, so it will give you a very wide view.

    Exactly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 168 ✭✭leohoju


    there's no optical zoom on the N95 so I didn't bother..
    think I'm copping on now to what you are saying about the lens being the thing that matters but what is a "short" lens i.e. is this related to , say, a 35mm lens on a normal digicam?

    and what denotes a long lens? In digital camera speak? Never realised until now how little I understood about photography!

    Actually, according to this, the N95 has an equivalent focal length of 35mm.

    So what you have is a little wider than a "normal lens", if 50mm is to be taken as "normal". A "short" or wide-angle lens would be anything below 50mm really. And a "long" or telephoto lens is, in theory, anything above the 50mm.

    A very simplistic explanation and I'm sure others can give something a little better than what I've just typed.


Advertisement