Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why Iraq and Afghanistan?

Options
  • 25-06-2008 2:51pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭


    I'm posting this thread because it came up in some of the other 911 threads but was a bit off topic so it warrents a new discussion.

    Bearing in mind that it's generally accepted that the US government lied in order to justify the Iraq war.
    Why do you think they actually went in?

    Do you beleive that Afghanistan was really about catching Osamma Bin Laaden?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    OIL.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    if it's about oil then why not just seize the oilfields and leave the rest to whoever wanted it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    I think afghanistan is mainly about keeping the taliban out of government. I'm interested in Iraq. Have the americans been taking the oil at an unreasonable price or what?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭uncle_sam_ie


    Afghanistan was taken for Oil. To the north of Afghanistan is one of the wealthiest oil fields in the world- on the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea. The problem is that the oil is landlocked. A pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan solves this problem. As for Iraq, just taking the oil field wouldn't have washed with the US public as a reason to go to war.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 Phuckmii


    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=uljOLFyCjjc

    Found this vid very interesting. Very believable unlike some of the theories you'd hear...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Afghanistan was taken for Oil. To the north of Afghanistan is one of the wealthiest oil fields in the world- on the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea. The problem is that the oil is landlocked. A pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan solves this problem. As for Iraq, just taking the oil field wouldn't have washed with the US public as a reason to go to war.

    Yeah, totally agree. Oil and gas. Cornerstones of the economy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,295 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Have the americans been taking the oil at an unreasonable price or what?
    Don't think they've taken any, yet. Also think that the petrol companies who were going to get oil from Saddam are now going to get it anyhoo's, albeit through someone else.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 mr.jones


    its not just the oil,its also that afghanistan is a stepping stone to india/pakistan/china/russia
    same with iraq,oil is one of the main issues but having easy access to the new big players in the world is important for the west incase china or india or russia wanna play ball.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    mr.jones wrote: »
    its not just the oil,its also that afghanistan is a stepping stone to india/pakistan/china/russia
    same with iraq,oil is one of the main issues but having easy access to the new big players in the world is important for the west incase china or india or russia wanna play ball.

    Was thinking about the strategic importance of the countries, however, the US already have bases all over Saudi, and there's always Israel, so I'm not sure if this was a factor...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 Max-Power


    From looking at a map, they could be the first two pieces of a corridor between Israel and somewhere in Central Asia (China maybe?). They would need to take Iran and Syria to complete it, and they have already accused both countries of engaging in nuclear activity so that they can begin creating the excuse for future wars.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Mahatma coat


    The US have bases all over Saudi Arabia alright, but tis not really a paletable option for either state for a long term relationship, US having to respect Saudi 'traditions'/Infidels runnin round the Holy Land with guns.

    better to take some other country and start afresh with 'Secular Democracy'


Advertisement