Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Theophilus

  • 19-06-2008 12:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭


    Luke and Acts seems to have been written to a person called Theophilus, but from my very basic knowledge of Greek Theo = God and Phil = Love of. Was there an actual person called Theophilus who Luke was writing for or were Acts and Luke addressed to a general audience who were "Lovers of God"?

    It is just a little something that I was wondering about.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,196 ✭✭✭BrianCalgary


    One person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭Pompey Magnus


    Probably was just one person, I just thought it coincidental that his name could be interpreted (by me at least) as being a general title for a broader audience. I think it can be difficult to distinguish between names written in Greek as the letters run into one another so had Luke actually meant to say "Lover of God" it would have been written exactly the same as the name.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,427 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Could be read either way, but it always looked more like an honorific to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    It could be either, but most Bible commentators tend to think it was a real person. Apparently the addition of "most excellent" would be added to someone's name, rather than to an honorific title.

    It is always possible that 'Theophilus' was used to mask the recepient's identity. Perhaps he was a Roman official and use of his real name would cost him his job (or worse) in a time of persecution. This is, of course, speculation, but I do know that Christians in China still use such false names when they write to each other to avoid arrest. In fact I had the interesting experience of giving a bunch of Chinese guys their new names when they received Christ during an underground house church meeting. They insisted that since I was the one who lead them to Christ then I had to give them their names. So I was saying, "OK, you will be David, and you will be Joseph etc."

    Another interesting idea, taken from the opening verses of Luke, is that he intended to send a copy of Mark's Gospel to Theophilus, but decided it was too short - so he wrote a more detailed account himself.


Advertisement