Unusual_Clouds_Prior_to_China_Earthquake

stink_fist

10 Minutes before the “Earthquake”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzVamNQzfYA

30 Minutes before the “Earthquake”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4

Húrin

It was a nukular bomb!!!!11!!

Really, it looks like a rainbow. Otherwise it could be the effect of light on any terrestrial outgassing that might be occurring.

stink_fist

Actually its haarp :rolleyes:

djpbarry

stink_fist wrote: »

10 Minutes before the “Earthquake”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzVamNQzfYA

30 Minutes before the “Earthquake”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4

What have clouds (videoed 450-550km from the earthquake's epicentre) got to do with the earthquake, i.e., what's your point?

AngryHippie

So locke moved the island again.....


Probably oil droplets in a cloud or something completely predictably boring. Clouds don't cause earthquakes, tectonic plates cause earthquakes

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

****... casey was right all along

JIMSTARK

Of course its HAARP.

As for Casey, within the next couple of years you will find that he was right on the majority of what he said.

JIMSTARK

AngryHippie wrote: »

So locke moved the island again.....


Probably oil droplets in a cloud or something completely predictably boring. Clouds don't cause earthquakes, tectonic plates cause earthquakes

Again, the military/industrial complex has moved on slightly since your secondary school geography book was printed.

This is HAARP. Brzezinski mentioned this and it is also signed into law with the ENMOD treaty.

mumhaabu

I heard it was the lizard people,

What the hell has this got to do with Green Issues, Conspiracy Theorys is thataway > Conspiracy Theorys

Phibsboro

A bit of googling reveals it is in fact a circumhorizontal arc...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumhorizontal_arc

c

JIMSTARK

Phibsboro wrote: »

A bit of googling reveals it is in fact a circumhorizontal arc...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumhorizontal_arc

c

Thats right, mate.

I also sell carbon credits. I plant the trees in the back garden, and for a one off price of €5000 I'll help reduce your carbon footprint.

I also have a rich Nigerian friend, he has been ousted from his homeland. If you gives us €1000 up front we will then give you a cut of his €100 million fortune in a few weeks time, you know when the paper work is completed.

PM me.

djpbarry

JIMSTARK wrote: »

Of course its HAARP.

As for Casey, within the next couple of years you will find that he was right on the majority of what he said.

So you've taken to blowing your own trumpet now? Do you honestly think people believe that all these re-reg's are other posters agreeing with you? Sad. Very sad.

glasbot

Nasa scientists have said they could be on the verge of a breakthrough in their efforts to forecast earthquakes.

Researchers say they have found a close link between electrical disturbances on the edge of our atmosphere and impending quakes on the ground below.

Just such a signal was spotted in the days leading up to the recent devastating event in China


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7435324.stm

Anti

Freaky, eh?

JIMSTARK

glasbot wrote: »

Nasa scientists have said they could be on the verge of a breakthrough in their efforts to forecast earthquakes.

NASA?????????????

I assume you are talking about the same crowd who have been arming space for the last 30 years with weapons and tracking devices to monitor and control the herd.

stink_fist

Microdot’s recent post on the Sichuan earthquake had some people doubting that clouds in the ionosphere could be somehow related to seismic activity within the earth’s crust. I for one have had a hard time working out how a connection could exist between the polychromatic splashes of cloud seen by cameras over the region a short while before the quake and the catastrophe itself.

MD flags HAARP as a potential culprit, suggesting that its ionospheric heating capacities could have had a hand in “ripping apart” the ionosphere, before somehow energising the earthquake zone beneath. I have no evidence that such a thing is possible. I doubt it, but on the question of a connection between ionospheric clouds the sceptics might have to give way.

It turns out that there is a sizable, and increasingly respected school of thought amongst seismologists that such a connection does indeed exist. What physicist Sergei Pulinets calls “seismo-ionospheric coupling” has been studied fairly intensively since researchers began linking the appearance of earthquake lights to subsequent tremors. In a 2004 paper he writes that its study “has passed through several stages starting from astonishment after initial discovery, enthusiastic but often speculative publications, and defeat by severe critics, to ultimately consecutive and systematic studies which have led to a substantiated physical model.”

Coincidentally, Pulinets notes that “It is commonly accepted that the Good Friday Alaska earthquake on March 27 of 1964 gave seismo-ionospheric coupling studies its initial impetus” although Soviet researchers in Tashkent soon took the mantle, so to speak, while the epicentre for seismo-ionospheric studies in recent times has been Japan or, increasingly, China.

Sceptics have, however, been numerous. One of the reasons is that colourful clouds and ionospheric disruptions as precursors to quakes have been “regionally variable” in the words of researchers from the France-based International Space University, who are seeking to sell an ionospheric Earthquake prediction system called TREMOR to the Chinese. Rather cynically, the scientists involved note that “China is presently experiencing rapid economic growth, which opens up new financial possibilities for augmenting existing earthquake measures.” European satellite systems, calibrated to scan the ionosphere above China might be just the ticket.

The TREMOR team wrote about regional variability as few ionospheric effects have been detected above American earthquake zones such as California, Alaska aside (which is a global hub for ionospheric jiggery-pokery). China and Japan, along with the territory of the Soviet Union and some parts of Latin America seem to be far more fertile test subjects for ionospheric diagnosticians.

Colourful clouds are also well documented features of seismic episodes. I’ll direct you to an excellent article on the subject by, you guessed it, an Alaskan journalist called Alberto Enriquez: Scientists drawn to legends of luminous displays that precede temblors. Enriquez takes us on a global and historical tour through sightings of earthquake clouds, adding a little theory into the mix, noting that:

In a recent issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research, physicist Friedemann Freund theorizes that positive charges can be generated when huge stresses are generated along faults in the Earth’s crust. The rocks in the crust normally act as insulators that conduct electrical charges only poorly. But under the severe stress generated before an earthquake, these rocks may behave briefly like “p-type semiconductors” found in computer chips, capable of releasing large numbers of positive charges referred to as “holes.”

Such charges can, according to Freund, “speed upward toward the surface of the Earth at between 220 and 660 mph” – ionizing the atmosphere as they surge forth.

So there you have it, an introduction to seismo-ionospheric phenomena. Whether the U.S. has been using HAARP to rip open holes in the ionosphere and stimulate earthquakes, I really can’t say, but the field is full of mysteries. Who knwos?

- http://szamko.gnn.tv/blogs/28434/Ion_Lion_Zion