Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Civil Action Question

  • 01-06-2008 10:40pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭


    If A takes a High Court Civil Action, for damages, against B.
    B is serves with a summons by A’s lawyer.
    B personally enters a defence, nine years pass and B hears nothing more.


    Can B, without retaining a lawyer, easily find out what’s happening?

    Are there laws to prevent people instigating frivolous civil actions?


Comments

  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    The question would be was it struck out? B can hire a lawyer to find out and yes there are bars to frivolous claims.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 451 ✭✭Rhonda9000


    ArthurJ wrote: »
    Can B, without retaining a lawyer, easily find out what’s happening?

    Why would B take such an illogical step :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭ArthurJ


    Rhonda9000 wrote: »
    Why would B take such an illogical step :D


    Lets imagine that B is an elderly and unwell person, with little funds at his disposal.
    He fears the cost of retaining a lawyer, yet he would like to know what’s happening with the case. That’s hardly illogical.

    What’s really illogical is that A can start the action, then sit back and do nothing, ultimately, it seems, forcing B to spend money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Would the case not get struck out if nothing is done?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭ArthurJ


    Tom Young wrote: »
    The question would be was it struck out? B can hire a lawyer to find out and yes there are bars to frivolous claims.


    What would cause it to be struck? What are the bars and how are they enforced?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Bond-007 wrote: »
    Would the case not get struck out if nothing is done?

    No, the defendant would have to bring a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution.

    Details of what the status is of a case can be obtained from the central office of the high court. This service is also available online, but it is very technical so it would be better for the hypothetical person to speak to the central office directly.

    As regards the retaining of a solicitor, motions to dismiss for want of prosecution are very complicated, and if someone brings one and loses, they risk alerting the other side to the delay and perhaps spur them on to bring the case forward. Also, if you win, you will be entitled to recover your legal costs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭ArthurJ


    No, the defendant would have to bring a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution.

    Details of what the status is of a case can be obtained from the central office of the high court. This service is also available online, but it is very technical so it would be better for the hypothetical person to speak to the central office directly.

    As regards the retaining of a solicitor, motions to dismiss for want of prosecution are very complicated, and if someone brings one and loses, they risk alerting the other side to the delay and perhaps spur them on to bring the case forward. Also, if you win, you will be entitled to recover your legal costs.

    That’s excellent. Thank you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Can you make such a motion ex parte?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Bond-007 wrote: »
    Can you make such a motion ex parte?

    I should think not.

    A is the other party and must be heard [ audit alterem partem].

    A is effectively a notice party and the Notice of Motion must be served on A's solicitors as they are on record. If A's solicitors come off record then B might get an order for substituted service and proceed accordingly.

    A might not turn up for the hearing of the motion but that is just his problem and his absence would not convert this into an ex parte application.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    BTW OP I trust that A is not an infant or a person under other legal disability as these reasons can cause the time limits to be enlarged for continuing an action.

    Bringing a Motion for Judgement sometimes wakes up sleeping litigants or manages to get the potential liability shifted from the original defendant on to the professional indemnity insurers of the plaintiff's solicitors :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 77 ✭✭ArthurJ


    NUTLEY BOY wrote: »
    BTW OP I trust that A is not an infant or a person under other legal disability as these reasons can cause the time limits to be enlarged for continuing an action.

    In this scenario, A would be a mature adult of sound mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    In such a case, at what point could the defendent simply claim "I have no idea what this is about" or claim it to be statute barred or similar?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭dermot_sheehan


    There is a differance between the statute of limitations (which is a definative time limit e.g. 1 year/6 years/12 years), during which a pleanary summons or civil bill must be issued and having a claim already in being struck out for want of prosecution. The statute of limitations tolls while a claimant is an infant or under a mental disability however since when a claimant who is under such a limitation takes a case, its by their next of friend, their age/mental status has no real impact on getting a claim struck out for want of prosecution.

    Such a motion is always brought on notice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Hobart


    Victor wrote: »
    In such a case, at what point could the defendent simply claim "I have no idea what this is about" or claim it to be statute barred or similar?

    Devil and Detail come to mind.


Advertisement