some thing fun that i wanted to do...(involves triple h)

jeffha

hey i have something fun that i wanted to...if you think that triple h is a great wrestler in terms of WRESTLING ability (in-ring skills), then WRITE WHATEVER IS UNDERLINED:

triple h is a great wrestler in terms of WRESTLING ability (in-ring skills) because of these matches: (insert list of matches here)

by the way, in-ring skills and wrestling ability are the same thing right? they both mean WRESTLING skills right?

Brolly

He is just great. No need to explain why I think so!

Mr.Nice Guy

How about this instead...if you think Triple H is a politicking muppet who uses his family connections to keep talented wrestlers down, then write whatever is underlined...

Triple H is a politicking muppet (ie a gimp) who uses his family connections to keep talented wrestlers down: (insert buried wrestlers here)

An overrated waste of space and has been for some time now. Can't wait until next year's Wrestlemania main event!

callaway92

^^
What he said..

ShawnRaven

Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »

How about this instead...if you think Undertaker is a politicking muppet who uses his WWE longetivity to keep talented wrestlers down, then write whatever is underlined...

An overrated waste of space and has been for some time now. Can't wait until next year's Wrestlemania main event!

Fixed that for ya, pal
VR!

mehfesto2

What's with Wrestlemania next year?

ShawnRaven

mehfesto2 wrote: »

What's with Wrestlemania next year?

It's in Houston, Texas. Which probably means Crippletakers swansong. After costing Edge his streak, and most likely burying him at TLC next week, i'm getting pretty much sick of him.

Good riddance to old rubbish methinks

VR!

DRakE

Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »

How about this instead...if you think Triple H is a politicking muppet who uses his family connections to keep talented wrestlers down, then write whatever is underlined...

Triple H is a politicking muppet (ie a gimp) who uses his family connections to keep talented wrestlers down: (insert buried wrestlers here)

An overrated waste of space and has been for some time now. Can't wait until next year's Wrestlemania main event!

/nod /nod

D-FENS

validreasoning! wrote: »

It's in Houston, Texas. Which probably means Crippletakers swansong. After costing Edge his streak, and most likely burying him at TLC next week, i'm getting pretty much sick of him.

Good riddance to old rubbish methinks

VR!

Could turn out to be HBK's swansong aswell if it's in Texas (Even if he is from San Antonio)


Plus there's a chance Edge could win Sunday yet, the writers are pretty unpredictable at the moment, after taking the belt off 'taker n the first place

mehfesto2

validreasoning! wrote: »

It's in Houston, Texas. Which probably means Crippletakers swansong. After costing Edge his streak, and most likely burying him at TLC next week, i'm getting pretty much sick of him.

Good riddance to old rubbish methinks

VR!

Cheers for that.
You'd think they'd get their acts together and push someyounger blood if there to lose Taker and/or HBK, wouldn't you, though?!

ShawnRaven

D-FENS wrote: »

Plus there's a chance Edge could win Sunday yet, the writers are pretty unpredictable at the moment, after taking the belt off 'taker n the first place

When it comes to WWE lately, the whole product is unpredictable. And not in a good way either. That being said, i enjoyed RAW a lot on Monday.

But i'm not holding my breath for ONS results.
VR!

Rjd2

validreasoning! wrote: »

It's in Houston, Texas. Which probably means Crippletakers swansong. After costing Edge his streak, and most likely burying him at TLC next week, i'm getting pretty much sick of him.

Good riddance to old rubbish methinks

VR!

Right and Super Hunter is not doing the same thing to young Randall Orton right now is he? :rolleyes:

rossie1977

since WM2000 HHH has been involved in 7 world title matches at WM, taker in 2, not really a fair comparison

ShawnRaven

Rjd2 wrote: »

Right and Super Hunter is not doing the same thing to young Randall Orton right now is he? :rolleyes:

I'd still rather SuperHunter over MegaCena any day!
VR!

ShawnRaven

mehfesto2 wrote: »

Cheers for that.
You'd think they'd get their acts together and push someyounger blood if there to lose Taker and/or HBK, wouldn't you, though?!

You're singing to the choir there. However WWE are now making the mistakes they criticised WCW for in 2003 in the sense that they're not making any new talent. They threw all their eggs into Jeff Hardy, and much as i enjoy seeing Jeff, he's not the most trustworthy as far as top guys go. Kennedy for RAW seems a safe bet, problem is, there are few people ready for main event. Edge is perfect, but WWE seem to just love the idea of feeding to Crippletaker (wonder who he pissed off for that?), MVP, as much as he has improved in the past year isn't quite main event level. Leaving us with who else? Festus? BISCUITS AND GRAVY!!

I love the irony of all of this really.
VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

You're singing to the choir there. However WWE are now making the mistakes they criticised WCW for in 2003

Tell me more

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

Tell me more

Tell me more, tell me more. Rovert, you're starting to sound like a Grease Soundtrack, seriously.

Obviously you didn't read the rest of my post. I think it's time you went on my ignore list kid, you're just not worth the time and the effort anymore.

(not that you were in the first place, but now the novelty has worn off.)
VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

Tell me more, tell me more. Rovert, you're starting to sound like a Grease Soundtrack, seriously.

Obviously you didn't read the rest of my post. I think it's time you went on my ignore list kid, you're just not worth the time and the effort anymore.

(not that you were in the first place, but now the novelty has worn off.)
VR!

I did read the rest of you post and agreed with it. So was Bill Watts booking WCW in 2003?

I just want to pont out , the winner of your arguments will actually recieve the "It's still real to me Dammit"


VR how is it every few months you get into an argument with somebody here ?

rovert

Deleted User wrote: »

I just want to pont out , the winner of your arguments will actually recieve the "It's still real to me Dammit"

I dont care Dave Wills is really nice guy, it would probably be an honour actually.

ShawnRaven

Deleted User wrote: »

VR how is it every few months you get into an argument with somebody here ?

I don't know Dre, think i should change my body spray or something?
VR!

rovert

Deleted User wrote: »

VR how is it every few months you get into an argument with somebody here ?

If only he could back what he says.

ShawnRaven

Only thing there was, i never said Bill Watts booked WCW in 2003. Now if you would like to believe that happened, more power to you, congratuations on looking like a complete tit in the process.

So, my question to you, is why would i back up something i didn't actually say?
Folks, we've found the missing village idiot, answers to the name of rovert, sadly this one is so dim, no village wants to claim him.

VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

Only thing there was, i never said Bill Watts booked WCW in 2003. Now if you would like to believe that happened, more power to you, congratuations on looking like a complete tit in the process.

So, my question to you, is why would i back up something i didn't actually say?
Folks, we've found the missing village idiot, answers to the name of rovert, sadly this one is so dim, no village wants to claim him.

VR!

Way to twist what I meant, I was jokingly referring to another thread where you got your facts screwed up (the Steiner thread), sorry if that went over your head. Doesnt change the fact you did say

validreasoning! wrote: »

You're singing to the choir there. However WWE are now making the mistakes they criticised WCW for in 2003 in the sense that they're not making any new talent.

WCW was sold in early 2001.

john concannon

You come across as such a dickhead.Back to F4W with ya son.You're not taken seriously here.

rovert

john concannon wrote: »

You come across as such a dickhead.Back to F4W with ya son.You're not taken seriously here.

Please back your statments up please this a discussion board. Stop with the personal insults and debate my points. From my time here your own contrabutions are hardly noteworthy.

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

Way to twist what I meant, I was jokingly referring to another thread where you got your facts screwed up (the Steiner thread), sorry if that went over your head. Doesnt change the fact you did say



WCW was sold in early 2001.

No sh*t? Next thing you'll be telling me that wrestling is worked?!
Re-read what i said, I said "WWE made the same mistakes they criticised WCW for in 2003"

Now, because your brain is obviously still in neutral, allow me to break that down for you.

Jim Ross was quoted on the Monday Night War documentary, which was shot in 2003, regarding the downfall of WCW, that "one of the problems was they didn't make new stars, only one guy in that entire lucrative run got a break, Goldberg"

Seriously, rovert, for as long as your brain is still in neutral, please enjoy your stay in F4W. Provided Alvarez doesn't boot you out of there for annoying him too.

VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

No sh*t? Next thing you'll be telling me that wrestling is worked?!
Re-read what i said, I said "WWE made the same mistakes they criticised WCW for in 2003"!

What did they stop in 2004 then?

validreasoning! wrote: »

Jim Ross was quoted on the Monday Night War documentary, which was shot in 2003, regarding the downfall of WCW, that "one of the problems was they didn't make new stars, only one guy in that entire lucrative run got a break, Goldberg"]"!

It was 2004 actually.

validreasoning! wrote: »

Seriously, rovert, for as long as your brain is still in neutral, please enjoy your stay in F4W. Provided Alvarez doesn't boot you out of there for annoying him too.

You need new insults VR, Ive only been on that site for 18 months and I subscribed to The Observer long before that.

I curious what did Bryan do to you, VR?

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

What did they stop in 2004 then?



It was 2004 actually.

False. It was released in 2004, but shot in 2003.

You need new insults VR, Ive only been on that site for 18 months and I subscribed to The Observer long before that.

I curious what did Bryan do to you, VR?

Who said he did anything, it's his obnoxious fans like yourself that pretty much piss me off.

VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

False. It was released in 2004, but shot in 2003.!

Proof please?

validreasoning! wrote: »

Who said he did anything, it's his obnoxious fans like yourself that pretty much piss me off.

Im a fan of his website more than him in fairness.

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

Proof please?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0408001/
It was released in feb 2004. It was also leaked on the internet earlier than that. And it takes WWE a considerable amount of time to produce their dvds.

VR!

rovert

validreasoning! wrote: »

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0408001/
It was released in feb 2004. It was also leaked on the internet earlier than that. And it takes WWE a considerable amount of time to produce their dvds.

VR!

I stand corrected.

I dont want to turn this into a big thing but the reference you made to the DVD was somewhat vague in fairness:

validreasoning! wrote: »

You're singing to the choir there. However WWE are now making the mistakes they criticised WCW for in 2003

Lets move on

ShawnRaven

rovert wrote: »

I stand corrected.

I dont want to turn this into a big thing but the reference you made to the DVD was somewhat vague in fairness:

Vague? No, Badly punctuated on my part, most likely as sometimes i type the way i would speak (fast!)

Lets move on

Agreed.
VR!

Tricity Bendix

jeffha wrote: »

hey i have something fun that i wanted to...if you think that triple h is a great wrestler in terms of WRESTLING ability (in-ring skills), then WRITE WHATEVER IS UNDERLINED:

triple h is a great wrestler in terms of WRESTLING ability (in-ring skills) because of these matches: (insert list of matches here)

by the way, in-ring skills and wrestling ability are the same thing right? they both mean WRESTLING skills right?

I'd rate ability to get a crowd psyched during a match above knowing thousands of holds. The ability to pull off a perfectly timed spinebuster is worth more to me than the ability to perform a Dragon Suplex or a 450 splash. So, no, wrestling skills and in-ring ability are not one and the same.

jeffha

wow 3 pages and not even one reply was about the topic