Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pats V Bohs (football)

  • 28-05-2008 11:37am
    #1
    soccerc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭


    Seemed to be a few snappers at the St Pats V Bohs game last night.

    Here is my favourite, Joey N'do

    2529525560_9febd842f0.jpg


    A few others here


Comments

  • #2
    Paulw
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Great portrait.

    Maybe it's just me, but it looks very over-saturated and almost artificial in colour.

    Good game, and interesting result. Looked like a few photographers alright. One or two I know to see.


  • #3
    kensutz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,200 ✭✭✭kensutz


    Saturation is a bit too much.


  • #4
    mehfesto2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭mehfesto2


    I like this picture, but it does seem slighly saturated. Great DOF. Where you down the shed end?

    Love the big PADDY on the chest. It could be few leagues other than the LOI!
    The result should make the league more interesting. Would love to see Bohs win it again.

    How are the security for bringing cameras to the match/getting close to snap away?


  • #5
    soccerc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭soccerc


    Paulw wrote: »
    Great portrait.

    Maybe it's just me, but it looks very over-saturated and almost artificial in colour.

    Good game, and interesting result. Looked like a few photographers alright. One or two I know to see.

    The saturation is deliberate for a particular process

    Here is the unprocessed version

    joeyndo.jpg


  • #6
    Paulw
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    thimblefull wrote: »
    The saturation is deliberate for a particular process

    Here is the unprocessed version

    That looks much more natural, and better IMHO. I think over-saturation is blinding at times and un-necessary, but you seem to have your own reasons for it.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    soccerc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭soccerc


    Paulw wrote: »
    That looks much more natural, and better IMHO. I think over-saturation is blinding at times and un-necessary, but you seem to have your own reasons for it.

    Not my preference to oversaturate, just following the settings provided by a particular client


  • #8
    Paulw
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    I know, for me, I'd provide the client with exactly what they want, but would then reprocess any files I'd use for myself, such as FlickR or my website. I wouldn't use client preferences, etc, for my own photo displays.

    Very good photos all the same.


  • #9
    soccerc
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭soccerc


    Paulw wrote: »
    I know, for me, I'd provide the client with exactly what they want, but would then reprocess any files I'd use for myself, such as FlickR or my website. I wouldn't use client preferences, etc, for my own photo displays.

    Very good photos all the same.

    The simple answer is the client uses my flickr to download the full size of what they want from the selection.


Advertisement