Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Successful cold fusion?

  • 24-05-2008 9:46am
    #1
    kaimera
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,396 ✭✭✭✭


    on /.

    translated page here

    Been a while since I've read about CF and whatnot but it's a good thing if working?


Comments

  • #2
    ApeXaviour
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Well, at least he's not an electrochemist :) but he is 85. Let's see what his peers have to say.


  • #3
    Belfast
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭Belfast


    I do not buy in to the secret Government conspiracy theory.

    The problem is there is not a accepted theory on how it works. Until there is its not going anywhere.

    Heavy Watergate - 46 min - Apr 7, 2008
    The original title of this documentary is : "Heavy Watergate : The War Against Cold Fusion". On March 23rd 1989, two respected chemists make...all » The original title of this documentary is : "Heavy Watergate : The War Against Cold Fusion". On March 23rd 1989, two respected chemists makes an announcement that rocks the world of science. Heavy water, readily available in the oceans, is used in tabletop experiments that yield enormous amounts of heat energy. Appropriately named "cold fusion", this purported breakthrough challenges many basic scientific concepts. In response, the gatekeepers of "official science", heavily reliant upon government funding for their hot fusion research, level an unprecedented smear campaign against the entire field of cold fusion science. Was their discovery of "fire from water" too good to be true ?. Or was it the discovery of the millennium ?
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8260851880353848969&q=cold%20fusion&hl=en


  • #4
    Belfast
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭Belfast


    just because they found Tritium does not mean fusion too place.

    other elements were found that have nothing to to with Fusion

    the samples may have been contaminated by Ormus.
    this is where the elements may have come from

    2 links on Ormus
    http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/articles.htm#BASICS

    http://www.nexusmagazine.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=75

    Ormus is yet another area with no accepted science behind it. Even if this is true is still not going anywhere.

    Even if "Cold Fusion" produces abundant cheap energy it will not be used unless the scientific community reach a consensus on a theory as to how it works.


Advertisement