Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Question for 40D users...

  • 16-05-2008 8:57am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 858 ✭✭✭


    So, I'm thinking of taking the plunge in the next few days. A question on my mind is about the battery grip. I was thinking of getting one, but I'm not sure about the size of the camera+grip. I'm upgrading from a 400D which deffo needs a grip, but since the 40D is that much bigger, is it really necessary? I know there are other advantages to the grip as well...extra buttons, 2 batteries, more comfortable for portraits, etc...


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭minikin


    get it - no question, much better balance with anything more substantial than the kit lens, the extra battery capacity, vertical controls etc really justify the cost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    I had the same debate with my 20D. I didn't need the extra battery power, and the body felt nice as it was.

    But, when I bought the battery pack, it made such a difference. The camera felt better. Nicer balance, firmer, extra buttons, portrait mode, etc. Well worth investing in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Duchovny


    Well i have a 40D and to be honest i don't think you need the grip, its big enough at least for my hands...

    I prefer to have more battery's then carry the extra weigh of the grip.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭bovril


    I went for the extra batteries option. I think I have the smallest hands in the world so the 40D is big enough without the grip. I carry so much in my bag too that I don't think I could handle the extra weight of the grip and the fact it would take up the space.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    My preference is without the grip too. The battery lasts forever anyway that buying a few cheap ones and having them handy makes that a non issue. I could never get used to using the shutter button on the grip either. Must be my age and all the years using a "standard" setup. The weight is a major factor too. In fact I think the camera handles better without the grip.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 648 ✭✭✭opti76


    if its a cost issue then you dont need the grip.

    its a brilliantly weighted camera without the grip, it feels secure in your hand. but with a big lense the grip helps the balance.

    its a personal preference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,070 ✭✭✭Placebo


    cameras also heavy as it is, with the 17-85 lense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭PixelTrawler


    Have the 400D plus grip. Got so used to it when I ordered the 40D i ordered the grip for it also.

    I ended up taking it off again. Its not needed in my opinion. My heaviest lens weights about 700g I think and it balances that nicely.

    Maybe if you wanted to balance a very heavy lens or if you have huge hands.

    The 400D was way too small on its on for my hands but the 40D is perfect.

    It really depends on personal preference of course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭IrishHomer


    Yes i agreee i have 40D and i like it without any grip.

    Few batteries in pockets does me fine. I also noticed on the Canon 40D that it is very light on battery power/consumption.

    I rarely change batteries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Calina


    I have to agree with the comments about the battery usage of the 40D. I have yet to reach its limits and I regularly got through two and three batteries with my 350D.

    I will probably get a spare battery for mine but so far don't feel I need teh battery grip.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,547 ✭✭✭City-Exile


    The grip is a must, for real men!
    Go on, take the plunge!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 340 ✭✭Fireman


    I have small hands also but I could not imagine what the 40D would feel like without the battery grip!! Go for it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 289 ✭✭Dink


    Get the grip! So handy for portrait shots!


Advertisement