Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brownian Motion

  • 08-05-2008 12:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭


    Hi,

    i need to evaluate E[exp(sigma.W(t))], sigma>0, W(t) is standard brownian motion.

    also can i take the expected value inside the brackets and exaluate as
    exp(sigma.E[W(t)])???

    Also i need to prove that standard brownian motion is a martingale..i can do it for brownian motion but not for standard..

    any help much appreciated..

    Max


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    i need to evaluate E[exp(sigma.W(t))], sigma>0, W(t) is standard brownian motion.

    E[exp(sigma.W(t))] = exp(sigma*sigma*t/2)

    You can see this by solving Integral(((1/Sqrt(2*PI)*t))*exp(sigma.Z*(sqrt t)) * exp(-Z*Z/2)dz)
    from minus infinity to infinity.

    If you don't like that method, you can use ito's lemma to show that

    exp(sigma.W(t))*exp(-sigma*sigma*t/2) = integral(exp(sigma.W(t))dW)

    which is a martingale with initial value one.
    also can i take the expected value inside the brackets and exaluate as
    exp(sigma.E[W(t)])???

    No.
    You can think of the E[] operator as being an integral from minus infinity to infinity. There's no rule which says

    integral(exp(x)dx) = exp(integral(x dx))
    Also i need to prove that standard brownian motion is a martingale..i can do it for brownian motion but not for standard..

    I think you might be a bit confused about what a standard brownian motion is here. It's a brownian motion with mean 0 and variance t.

    You can show it's a martingale by

    E[w(t) | Fs] = E[w(t) - w(s) + w(s) |Fs] = E[w(t) - w(s)] + E[ w(s) |Fs]

    Now, w(t) - w(s) is independant of Fs, so the expectation is zero. w(s) is Fs-measurable, so the expectation is W(s)

    so the above simplifies to E[w(t) | Fs] = w(s) so w is a martingale.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭MaxPower89


    thanks for that.

    and how do i prove that the expected value is less than infinity to show its a martingale? i have a solution for brownian motion and it works out to sqrt((2.sigma.sigma.t)/pie)....so can i just remove the sigma^2 here to get sqrt(2.t/pie)..and this is less than infinity?

    thanks again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    MaxPower89 wrote: »
    thanks for that.

    and how do i prove that the expected value is less than infinity to show its a martingale? i have a solution for brownian motion and it works out to sqrt((2.sigma.sigma.t)/pie)....so can i just remove the sigma^2 here to get sqrt(2.t/pie)..and this is less than infinity?

    thanks again

    Sorry, not sure that I understand the question. What do you mean by a solution for brownian motion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭MaxPower89


    im just stuck on trying to show that the expected value of the absolute value of standard brownian motion is less than infinity..ie...E[|W(t)|] < infinity. I have this worked out for brownian motion and the expectation worked out to sqrt((2.sigma.sigma.t)/pie), which is less that infinity.

    I think i should be "getting" this a lot easier but its just not clicking with me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    MaxPower89 wrote: »
    im just stuck on trying to show that the expected value of the absolute value of standard brownian motion is less than infinity..ie...E[|W(t)|] < infinity. I have this worked out for brownian motion and the expectation worked out to sqrt((2.sigma.sigma.t)/pie), which is less that infinity.

    I think i should be "getting" this a lot easier but its just not clicking with me.


    E[|W(t)|] <= (E[W(t)^2])^1/2 = t^(1/2)

    since if p < q, then the p-norm of a random variable is less than or equal to the q-norm.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement