Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

lisbon C&C

  • 06-05-2008 6:32pm
    #1
    lenco75
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17 ✭


    my thoughts - too contrasty- 'tho the light was very harsh, and maybe the toning is a bit too heavy handed? comments welcome. john


Comments

  • #2
    kjt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭kjt


    I really like the tone of these shots, they remind me of the tv show Picking daisies or the movie a series of unfortunate events.

    The shadow of the tree in number one is great.
    Nice shots!


  • #3
    duckysauce
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭duckysauce


    lenco75 wrote: »
    my thoughts - too contrasty- 'tho the light was very harsh, and maybe the toning is a bit too heavy handed? comments welcome. john


    nope like them alot what did you use for toning?


  • #4
    lenco75
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17 ✭lenco75


    I used a TLR sepia tone and faded it back about 40%, not been happy with the print output on these though. Which led me to post them.
    Thanks for your comments


  • #5
    AnCatDubh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,393 ✭✭✭AnCatDubh


    I think they are nice but just one query - did you sharpen much? When I examine them up close they look over sharpened in so far as you can see 'fringing' on the edges (not sure if thats the exact technical term - its the over sharp that i'm trying to describe). This would lead to unflattering prints if thats a problem. Of course i could be (and frequently am) entirely wrong! ;o)

    Cheers.


  • #6
    lenco75
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17 ✭lenco75


    well spotted- they ended up havin alot of processing and there is some haloing goin on tho the compression for web seems to have exacerbated this effect- I was planning to do a version of the top one from scratch- hopefully i can remember all the steps. Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    kjt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,057 ✭✭✭kjt


    lenco75 wrote: »
    well spotted- they ended up havin alot of processing and there is some haloing goin on tho the compression for web seems to have exacerbated this effect- I was planning to do a version of the top one from scratch- hopefully i can remember all the steps. Thanks

    I'd love to see the steps if you have the time to type them down too :)


  • #8
    Covey
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,368 ✭✭✭Covey


    Know 3 of the 4 locations actually:D

    To be honest not overly gone on the processing. Works better on the building shots than on the other's imo.

    Like no. 4 a lot and No. 1 , thats a shot I wish I had taken, simply marvellous.

    T.


Advertisement