Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Econometrics - Fixed/Random effects

  • 03-05-2008 7:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 872 ✭✭✭


    Would anybody be able to explain Fixed and Random Effects models better than the various places i've read about them already? Having trouble getting my head around it.

    Most literature i've found on it seems to assume a phd.

    What i understand it to mean:

    Fixed Effects- If groups within a sample have innate differences, which are constant over time, then the fixed effects model is used. It adds a dummy variable of 1 or 0 for the group in the model, and the coefficient on this is that groups intercept.

    Random Effects- emm... er.... ?

    As you can see, it's not exactly exam standard.

    Any help would be appreciated.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    From: http://www.google.ie/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ioa.pdx.edu%2Fnewsom%2Fmlrclass%2Fho_randfixd.doc&ei=iPocSNb_HYmOxAHZ3fj1Cw&usg=AFQjCNHzSC9lBedPWXWEvKhOBo_aoW0mbw&sig2=vS5YMNx1JR9ko22kKcRgbw

    (Not aimed at economics but it's a start for you)


    Random variable: (1) is assumed to be measured with measurement error. The scores are a function of a true score and random error; (2) the values come from and are intended to generalize to a much larger population of possible values with a certain probability distribution (e.g., normal distribution); (3) the number of values in the study is small relative to the values of the variable as it appears in the population it is drawn from.

    Examples: photographs representing individuals with differing levels of attractiveness manipulated in an experiment, census tracks



    Fixed variable: (1) assumed to be measured without measurement error; (2) desired generalization to population or other studies is to the same values; (3) the variable used in the study contains all or most of the variable’s values in the population.

    Examples: gender, race, or intervention vs. control group.



    The types of variables you have decide what type of model you can use. (i.e. if it's random, you have to use non-linear estimation iirc i.e. GLS or whatever)

    Wiki links:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed_effects_estimation

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_effects_estimator

    (look at the sources there rather than the articles themselves, you'll probably need more depth).


    Someone who has actually studied this stuff for an exam might be able to help you more. Throwing up an example question might also help (i.e. what exactly are you being asked for etc). Google has a whole bunch of explanations, but be careful that what you're reading is actually relevant for what you're being asked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 243 ✭✭turf


    i jus sat an econometrics exam and surprisingly didnt come across this...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 872 ✭✭✭gerry87


    Thanks for the reply, really helped clarify things.

    So, the test came and went, it was a bit of a shambles, 2 pages of stata output that was photocopied so poorly you couldn't make out the numbers.

    The lecturer phrased questions in ways that have never come up in class or notes and that nobody i talked to understood, so even if you new the entire course inside out, you didn't know what was being asked unluess you happened to stumble across a question phrased in this way. Very unfair.

    There were no past papers so we were given a sample paper, the test only resembled the layout of the sample. Question styles were completely different.

    It was an applied econometrics course, and in the sample paper 50% involved economic interpertation of data, the actual paper had no economic interpertation at all. It was as if it was meant to send us studying the wrong type of stuff.

    Quite annoying to happen with finals.


Advertisement