Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Downturn on transport - what has been delayed?

  • 03-05-2008 1:16am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭


    With the economic situation worsening what transport projects are/will be scaled back or stopped? Nothing around Dublin is likely to suffer but regional stuff will. Atlantic corridor is as dead as a dodo. No rail links between mickey mouse 'cities'. Dublin or nothing is my point of view in relation to transport.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭Zoney


    Yeah, cause *that's* a recipe for having the regions contribute to the national coffer rather than being a net drain. How clever.

    Sure there are no problems whatsoever from having the population migrate to Dublin, it's working like clockwork. It's not remotely in the national interest (i.e. Dublin interest too) to facilitate commerce between Galway, Limerick and Cork. If Dubliners have to sit in perpetual traffic jams, why shouldn't everyone else have to too.

    /sarcasm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭Colm R


    darkman2 wrote: »
    With the economic situation worsening what transport projects are/will be scaled back or stopped? Nothing around Dublin is likely to suffer but regional stuff will. Atlantic corridor is as dead as a dodo. No rail links between mickey mouse 'cities'. Dublin or nothing is my point of view in relation to transport.



    Jaysus its that kind of attitude that drives me mad. Your attitude is the same as the powers that be and were that have left us in the mess we are in now. Dublin is unsustainable because our government are not investing in our regional cities. If they did the right thing then the advatages would be

    1) Spread the wealth and make jobs more accessible to the entire population and hence contribute to the economy.

    2) Takes the pressure off Dublin Infrastructure.

    I do agree Dublin needs a Metro, Dublin needs the interconnector. Dublin needs integrated ticketing. But attitudes like yours piss of "Culchies" like me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    Colm R wrote: »
    Jaysus its that kind of attitude that drives me mad. Your attitude is the same as the powers that be and were that have left us in the mess we are in now. Dublin is unsustainable because our government are not investing in our regional cities. If they did the right thing then the advatages would be

    1) Spread the wealth and make jobs more accessible to the entire population and hence contribute to the economy.

    2) Takes the pressure off Dublin Infrastructure.

    I do agree Dublin needs a Metro, Dublin needs the interconnector. Dublin needs integrated ticketing. But attitudes like yours piss of "Culchies" like me.

    It's not just the government (though we all know about the pay and pensions that they, among all our TDs, get! :mad:) - it's also landowners, speculators (people who amass huge fortunes for doing absolutely nothing! :mad:), businesses which charge the sun, moon and stars for basic goods and services (among our employers who are looking for pay restraint! :rolleyes:), a certain type of employee who will do a little for as much as they'll get away with (the results from which consumers are frequently the victim! :mad:), certain ranks among our civil servants who get paid unreasonable sums of money before receiving massive pensions, and last but not least: tax evasion and unreasonable claims against tax (again, big business people seem to be the biggest culprits! :mad:).

    The main reason why our transport system is in such a mess is largely because of greed! :mad: - greed which has push up the price of houses which in turn, pushed young families further and further away from Dublin, which in turn, has lead to longer commuting patterns which in turn, meant that transport money had to be diverted to deal with these issues - longer trains and platforms on existing lines, extra motorway capacity in and around Dublin (for example we might not have needed the N2 HQDC or M3 motorway if our commuting patterns were more compact). In that case, simple by-passes along the existing N3 (and an S2 for Ashbourne) may have sufficed in the medium term. If our commuter belt wasn't so large, more money could have been spent on LUAS connections, extra buses and better QBCs etc - and if there wasn't such greed, such resources could have been provided and sustained at much lower cost per mile! With this in mind plus a healthy non-greed driven economy, with might have be able to do an outer orbital motorway around Dublin which would act as a life-line for rural towns and communties rather than being an M50 Mark II.

    It's our Country, It's our Responsibility!!!

    Regards!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭darkman2


    Colm R wrote: »
    Jaysus its that kind of attitude that drives me mad. Your attitude is the same as the powers that be and were that have left us in the mess we are in now. Dublin is unsustainable because our government are not investing in our regional cities. If they did the right thing then the advatages would be

    1) Spread the wealth and make jobs more accessible to the entire population and hence contribute to the economy.

    2) Takes the pressure off Dublin Infrastructure.

    I do agree Dublin needs a Metro, Dublin needs the interconnector. Dublin needs integrated ticketing. But attitudes like yours piss of "Culchies" like me.

    Whether it annoys you or not is a bit irrelevant - fact is regional towns have to be connected to Dublin with good infrastruture for real benefit to the wider economy. Cork to Limerick for example does not seem overly important atm. BTW ive an awful feeling the metro will get the chop. Too expensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭Colm R


    darkman2 wrote: »
    Whether it annoys you or not is a bit irrelevant - fact is regional towns have to be connected to Dublin with good infrastruture for real benefit to the wider economy. Cork to Limerick for example does not seem overly important atm. BTW ive an awful feeling the metro will get the chop. Too expensive.


    Dublin is not the be all end all. Inter Urban Routes are important, but we are sacrificing work which can be important. In Cork, the Sarsfield and Bandon Road Interchanges have been sacrificed for Inter Urban Routes, or Roads to Dublin. Getting rid of the roundabouts and putting in proper junctions as originally planned would improve the lives of more people
    than any road to Dublin. Same situations are present in the other cities. And that is entirely the cause of the attidude of:
    darkman2 wrote: »
    Dublin or Nothing


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭Nuttzz


    Capital projects wont be cut, current spending will dry up though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭orbital83


    While the OP's point may not be popular, it will probably be borne out.
    The N18 has already been shelved and the N17 looks like it will be a PPP (toll).

    This is unfortunate as a further incentive for growth outside Dublin will be removed and the imbalance can only worsen.

    Projects like the N17 / N18 should not be downgraded or scrapped while pet projects like the WRC are allowed to go ahead so as to pander to interest groups.

    Quality commuter rail services stretching ten miles out of Galway, Cork and Limerick are badly needed. Not a slow, meandering regional train "service" which will serve no purpose but to give kicks to a few UK trainspotters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    darkman2 wrote: »
    Whether it annoys you or not is a bit irrelevant - fact is regional towns have to be connected to Dublin with good infrastruture for real benefit to the wider economy. Cork to Limerick for example does not seem overly important atm. BTW ive an awful feeling the metro will get the chop. Too expensive.

    Cork Limerick has very poor connections as it is. the N20 is a disgrace especially around Buttevant. the rail line is indirect,

    A high quality transport link between these two cities would see traffic growth increase dramatically. reducing travel time to under an hour would do more to boost the economy of Cork and Limerick than cutting more time off the N7 or N8 routes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭Schuhart


    Colm R wrote: »
    Getting rid of the roundabouts and putting in proper junctions as originally planned would improve the lives of more people
    than any road to Dublin.
    Fine, if that's what people prioritise.
    John J wrote: »
    Projects like the N17 / N18 should not be downgraded or scrapped while pet projects like the WRC are allowed to go ahead so as to pander to interest groups.
    I think this is the key point. If money is short, we really do need to put it into whatever will give us the greatest return. However, is this actually going to happen? I take it the WRC is the only part of the programme guaranteed to be delivered, as the need to be seen spending a large amount of money in Clare to no end seems a higher political priority than anything else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭D'Peoples Voice


    Schuhart wrote: »
    I take it the WRC is the only part of the programme guaranteed to be delivered, as the need to be seen spending a large amount of money in Clare to no end seems a higher political priority than anything else.
    I would have thought it's the votes in Mayo that they are chasing seeing as how FG almost occupy every TD seat available in Mayo.
    But I 100% agree, go for the projects that generate the greatest return to GDP - then when we have money to squander - spend it on the "social" projects !


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    Cork Limerick has very poor connections as it is. the N20 is a disgrace especially around Buttevant. the rail line is indirect,

    A high quality transport link between these two cities would see traffic growth increase dramatically. reducing travel time to under an hour would do more to boost the economy of Cork and Limerick than cutting more time off the N7 or N8 routes.

    slightey off topic, my theory is that ity is quicker to do Cork to Limerick via the M7 / Mitchelstown and Hospital (or Tipperary)....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Great news
    the government are now pulling the plug on important road projects that were meant to start this year such as

    the M18. This was announced last year that it would go ahead as planned in 2008.

    I see it like this ah sure pout face cowen wants another bypass around Tullamore "sure it will be lovely" etc etc............ Cowen with a degree in law.. my ass. Anyway Tullamore get's fast tracked out of the blue. It has already begun construction, given the fact of the economic cliamate in this country at the moment. Yay more money wasted elsewhere when there is even little left of it. Horray..

    I tell you what though. Tullamore already has a relief road around the town. N52 traffic is very small.

    Yet the Likes of the N18 at Gort will suffer now lenghty tailbacks that kildare and Ennis had faced years before.

    Logic will never prevail as long as we have nobs in government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Tullamore is an horrendous traffic blackspot and should have started long ago, Cowen or not. The "relief road" is a bloody joke.

    There are still lots of Gorts out there, just unfortunate fact that there is not enough money in the pot to do everyhting all at once no matter how pressing the need.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    mfitzy wrote: »
    Tullamore is an horrendous traffic blackspot and should have started long ago, Cowen or not. The "relief road" is a bloody joke.

    There are still lots of Gorts out there, just unfortunate fact that there is not enough money in the pot to do everyhting all at once no matter how pressing the need.

    So you want Tullamore to get a second relief road a little further out

    it's nonsense to build this for the purpose. It won't solve Tullamore's traffic problems Tullamore is not a blackspot for traffic, it may get busy at rush hour but what town doesn't?

    We are talking about a secondary road that carries max 4,000 vehicles a day that is already diverted around the fricken town. It get's another bypass because Cowen said so. It should of waited, as they are other priorities to be dealt with FIRST.

    N18 carries max 25,000 vehicles a day around Ennis to around 11,500 around Gort and rising double figures near Oranmore again. Traffic is rapidly growing since the Ennis bypass. Tailbacks are getting redicoulous already. The government were going to build it this year but Dempsy decided to waste a few million on advertising on a nowhere moving T21 and Cown spending at least 100million on his new bypass. The tullamore bypass was not listed high on the T21 yet the atlantic corridor was and that got the back burner while they are digging the tullamore N52 as we speak... silly silly crap.


    seriously don't argue with me on this one, this country is like a comedy sketch for dumb planners and people in government.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    corktina wrote: »
    slightey off topic, my theory is that ity is quicker to do Cork to Limerick via the M7 / Mitchelstown and Hospital (or Tipperary)....
    In fact that's pretty much the old Cork Limerick road, before the roads were changed from Ts to N routes.

    they could extend the the N20 along there and then swing towards the N24 and multiplex there onto limerick

    But then again this is Ireland wahey....

    P.S it would be a good idea.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    mysterious wrote: »
    Great news
    the government are now pulling the plug on important road projects that were meant to start this year such as

    the M18. This was announced last year that it would go ahead as planned in 2008.

    I hear people saying that the M18 schemes are shelved - where did this information come from?

    We also hear about further deterioration in the public finances for the month of April - some €136m which brings the total deficit for 2008 to €736m - of course, this implies that the deficit by the end of March was €600m, which works out at an average of €200m per month for the first quarter. Now if April's deficit was €136m behind target, is this not actually an improvement, relatively speaking, especially when people were expecting our finances to be over €2bn short by the end of December. Also, if the decline in the monthly deficit continues, will this not have further impact on overall 2008 figure?

    Just wondering!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    mysterious wrote: »
    So you want Tullamore to get a second relief road a little further out

    it's nonsense to build this for the purpose. It won't solve Tullamore's traffic problems Tullamore is not a blackspot for traffic, it may get busy at rush hour but what town doesn't?

    We are talking about a secondary road that carries max 4,000 vehicles a day that is already diverted around the fricken town. It get's another bypass because Cowen said so. It should of waited, as they are other priorities to be dealt with FIRST.

    N18 carries max 25,000 vehicles a day around Ennis to around 11,500 around Gort and rising double figures near Oranmore again. Traffic is rapidly growing since the Ennis bypass. Tailbacks are getting redicoulous already. The government were going to build it this year but Dempsy decided to waste a few million on advertising on a nowhere moving T21 and Cown spending at least 100million on his new bypass. The tullamore bypass was not listed high on the T21 yet the atlantic corridor was and that got the back burner while they are digging the tullamore N52 as we speak... silly silly crap.


    seriously don't argue with me on this one, this country is like a comedy sketch for dumb planners and people in government.

    ...OK, you're right! If the said argument for the by-pass is based on traffic levels, then the figures which you quote (they look correct) makes this project look blatantly politically motivated. Of course I think the presence of Brian Cowen in the vicinity did help matters along somewhat (I'd be insane to think otherwise!). However, there's another factor which must enter the equation.

    When the National Spatial Strategy was published, there were towns and cities designated as gateway centres around the coast. In addition, a major development triangle for the midlands of which Athlone, Mullingar and Tullamore formed the apexes, was indentified. With population expansion in mind, Tullamore seemed easily the poor relation for road infrastructure - Mullingar has almost an O-Ring (N4 DC to the North, N52 By-pass to the East and South, plus distributor road to the West and South) while Athlone has had its motorway style ring road (5 interchanges) since the early 1990's. This would surely represent a massive imbalance in terms of economic advantage.

    With all the above said though, there is an economic downturn, especially in the construction sector, so maybe the case for the Tullamore By-pass is not so sound in the interim. All I can say is...

    ... Let the balls decide! :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭orbital83


    I hear people saying that the M18 schemes are shelved - where did this information come from?

    N17 will be PPP (read toll)
    http://www.galwaynews.ie/3376-state-runs-out-cash-n17

    No money for Gort bypass
    http://www.galwaynews.ie/3586-no-money-gort-bypass

    Cheers
    John


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭1huge1


    corktina wrote: »
    slightey off topic, my theory is that ity is quicker to do Cork to Limerick via the M7 / Mitchelstown and Hospital (or Tipperary)....
    From Hospital myself and for me its so much easier to go by mitchelstown as its only 15mins away...
    Though as bad as the main road from Limerick to Cork is, its still shorter I'd say...

    There was talk in another thread of having a motorway from mitchelstown to Limerick, interesting idea

    Edit: Sorry only seen mysterious's post now...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    mysterious wrote: »
    So you want Tullamore to get a second relief road a little further out

    it's nonsense to build this for the purpose. It won't solve Tullamore's traffic problems Tullamore is not a blackspot for traffic, it may get busy at rush hour but what town doesn't?

    We are talking about a secondary road that carries max 4,000 vehicles a day that is already diverted around the fricken town. It get's another bypass because Cowen said so. It should of waited, as they are other priorities to be dealt with FIRST.

    N18 carries max 25,000 vehicles a day around Ennis to around 11,500 around Gort and rising double figures near Oranmore again. Traffic is rapidly growing since the Ennis bypass. Tailbacks are getting redicoulous already. The government were going to build it this year but Dempsy decided to waste a few million on advertising on a nowhere moving T21 and Cown spending at least 100million on his new bypass. The tullamore bypass was not listed high on the T21 yet the atlantic corridor was and that got the back burner while they are digging the tullamore N52 as we speak... silly silly crap.


    seriously don't argue with me on this one, this country is like a comedy sketch for dumb planners and people in government.

    Mysterious I would love to know where you pull these figures from :D.
    4,000 a day through Tulllmaore just does not seem correct to me anyhow- would you care to give us a link to where you got that figure. That should be N80 AND N52 by the way.

    And I cannot see 25,000 a day from the ennis bypass either. The sections between Shannon and Limerick are not the same thing at all to my mind. Traffic is appreciably lighter past Shannon. Again evidence of that figure would be useful.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    John J wrote: »

    Thanks for that mate!

    Off topic - what on earth did boards do with the sarcastic smilie! - It was my favourite! :eek:

    Now, about the N18 - from what I read, it will be 'kind of started' this year with the provision of €20m for CPOs and prelim' contracts like fencing etc. The N11 Arklow to Rathnew is now at a similar stage awaiting the go-ahead for the main contract.

    As of now, the main problem (in addition to exchequer returns) is that there are so many inter-urbans underway at present - the M6 Kilbeggan to Athlone, M6 Athlone to Galway (2 projects), M7/M8 Portlaoise to Borris and Cullahill, M7 Borris to Limerick (2 projects), N7 Limerick Tunnel, M8 Cullahill to Cashel, M8 Cahir to Fermoy (1.5 projects - Cahir to Cashel section now open), plus the entire M9 (apart from the 5-6km Kilcullen Link - 4 projects). Other large non inter-urban projects include the M50 Upgrade, M25 Waterford By-pass and M3 Clonee to Kells. Maybe when all these projects reach completion, there'll be more money in the coffers!

    We'll just have to do what we can in the present conditions - getting the inter-urbans done is the crucial part.

    Regards!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    mfitzy wrote: »
    Mysterious I would love to know where you pull these figures from :D.
    4,000 a day through Tulllmaore just does not seem correct to me anyhow- would you care to give us a link to where you got that figure. That should be N80 AND N52 by the way.

    And I cannot see 25,000 a day from the ennis bypass either. The sections between Shannon and Limerick are not the same thing at all to my mind. Traffic is appreciably lighter past Shannon. Again evidence of that figure would be useful.

    Does it not... ok.


    Well the N52 figures for Delvin is around 5,133 a.a.d.t. From the nra counter site. Also bear in mind N51 multiplexes here so it will take a good chunk out of the N52 actual.

    Traffic levels on the N52 are much smaller than that of any section of N18. Now you can sling shot another farce argument if you want. Your obviously not familar with this road, as you have not seen the traffic that used to passed through Ennis and Clarecastle on a daily basis lol. Even back before the Newmarket on fergus bypass(pop less than 1,000) had occaisonal few mile tailbacks. this was 7 years ago.

    I have cousins who live beside the N52. I also go on my observation and commen sense. which I believe I have. As a child I used to travel this road a lot and still do. I'm familar with every town on the route. I have travelled the entire lenght of the N52 from Nenagh to Dundalk too. On all long distance national routes long distance traffic is generally lowest middway between the two main destinations. I.e Tullamore been fairly midway.

    I say i can clearly estimate the level of traffic that uses this road. And I will safely say I know a damn lot about roads too.


    Tullamore bypass was politically driven end of story. There is already bypass there to direct the few thousands cars out of the town. I tell you the difference it cost a hell of alot more, which is not needed in terms of priority at this stage! Hear that point.

    Traffic counters between Shannon and Cratloe already is over 35,000 a day. 28,000 just before the N19 Intersection. The ennis bypass is "around" 25,000 max, maybe less, if you still want to argue that.:rolleyes:. Since the Ennis bypass (i have travelled it recently) traffic growth on the S2 lane road has reached almost capacity and tailbacks through Gort have detrioriated. So I think I made a good estimate, considering there are no counters on the Ennis bypass.

    This section is the most dangerous btw. The level of commerce and H.G.V that use this road is also high, being the main Cork/Galway via limerick Corridor. With the Limerick tunnel nearing completion, this route will the most important road outside of Dublin economically. You are been ridicoulous in arguing for the N52 over these circumstances. To top it all, N18 is now on the long finger.

    N52 traffic through Tullamore would not be anyway near the levels of the N18. If there is any congestion in Tullamore, (which IM0 is nothing to talk about) its majorly local generated.

    The relief road is perfect, so Town centre traffic is irrelevant to this topic and your pathetic arguement:)

    I'd say give it over. Everyone knows that the Tullamore bypass was politically driven and not needed in comparison to some projects of the T21 which are now sickingly shelved

    You must be buddy buddy with Cowen so.:D


    I hope logic holds true, to your brain...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Pray tell what exactly has Delvin got to do with Tullamore :confused::confused::confused:??? Apart from being 30 miles away on the same route is all I can think anyhow, which clearly has nothing to do with Tullamore.
    Is that what you base 4,000 a day on through Tullamore then and of course your own anecdotal observations outside your cousins house there. And most importantly lets not forget your opinion that Tullamore has no traffic problems; if you have that opinion you clearly have never sat been stuck in the place like many of the rest of us.

    Anyhow once again great to see the project underway.

    And you're telling me to be logical ;)


    And personally having travelled between Ennis and Galway bar Gort and Crusheen it is not that bad a road for the most part at all.
    Travelled the Ennis bypass on many a week day I struggle to see where 25,000 a day is coming from. Again you have no concrete figure to back that one up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    mfitzy wrote: »
    Pray tell what exactly has Delvin got to do with Tullamore :confused::confused::confused:??? Apart from being 30 miles away on the same route is all I can think anyhow, which clearly has nothing to do with Tullamore.
    Is that what you base 4,000 a day on through Tullamore then and of course your own anecdotal observations outside your cousins house there. And most importantly lets not forget your opinion that Tullamore has no traffic problems; if you have that opinion you clearly have never sat been stuck in the place like many of the rest of us.

    Anyhow once again great to see the project underway.

    And you're telling me to be logical ;)


    And personally having travelled between Ennis and Galway bar Gort and Crusheen it is not that bad a road for the most part at all.
    Travelled the Ennis bypass on many a week day I struggle to see where 25,000 a day is coming from. Again you have no concrete figure to back that one up.
    `

    Delvin and Tullmmore are both on the N52 and you say only 30 miles apart. N52 is busier here as it multiplexes with N51. still a relevant fact to give way so some idea of what kind of traffic uses this road. plus the fact it's Tullamore nearest traffic counter. the traffic you sit in, is locally generated the bypass is only diverting traffic off the relief road onto the new road further out. see the point?

    This section of N18 is a bad road considering the amount of traffic using it, your memory is not up to date. Its a windy narrow S2 road with even Z shape bends and no hard shoulders for much of its length, traffic actually has to stop to allow a H.G.V to make the turn just a few miles past the Ennis bypass end. It then has to go through Gort a bad bottleneck. It's actually the worst section of N18. So you've proved to everyone you don't actually know much.

    Yes you are struggling i see that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    mysterious wrote: »
    `

    Delvin and Tullmmore are both on the N52 and you say only 30 miles apart. N52 is busier here as it multiplexes with N52. still a relevant fact to give way so some idea of what kind of traffic uses this road. plus the fact it's Tullamore nearest traffic counter. the traffic you sit in, is locally generated the bypass is only diverting traffic off the relief road onto the new road further out. see the point?

    It is a bad road, your memory is not up to date. Its a windy narror S2 road with even Z shape bends, that actually have to stop a H.G.V to make the turn. It then has to go through Gort. It's actually the worst section of N18. So you've proved to everyone you don't actually know much.

    Yes you are struggling i see that.

    Well i'm giving my opinions on the road as I saw it; you seem to have no prob doing same with Tullamore. Honestly, it's not that bad a road,the N18, I was expecting far worse going the hysterics of some posters here. Decent surface, visibility and hard shoulder for much of the route. I personallly cannot see it getting a huge priority for the next few years. All cash is tied up in the inter urbans.

    And please, drop the abrasive attidude with me please; it doesen't suit you. Unless of course you can point to somewhere stating that only 4,000 vehicles go through Tullamore daily. Delvin has nothing got to do with Tullamore, actually 36.2 miles apart according to AA.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    mfitzy wrote: »
    Well i'm giving my opinions on the road as I saw it; you seem to have no prob doing same with Tullamore. Honestly, it's not that bad a road,the N18, I was expecting far worse going the hysterics of some posters here. Decent surface, visibility and hard shoulder for much of the route. I personallly cannot see it getting a huge priority for the next few years. All cash is tied up in the inter urbans.

    And please, drop the abrasive attidude with me please; it doesen't suit you. Unless of course you can point to somewhere stating that only 4,000 vehicles go through Tullamore daily. Delvin has nothing got to do with Tullamore, actually 36.2 miles apart according to AA.

    As you saw it.. Ok please go back and check again.

    Im serious. 80% of road is not HS. Now I must give you a shovel.

    It was given priority, in fact the government fast tracked it to go ahead this year. they stalled it while muffin mouth got his bypass for Tullamore. The money was there. The government want to spend money redicoulously. But that's Ireland. N18 is more important, get over it.


    Yes Delvin N52 does have something to do with it, its N52 traffic. stop faffing about. Traffic is not going to be much more or much less than that figure. Its around 4,000 near Nenagh too. Just accept it.

    same way the figures for Gort would be exceptionally higher.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,082 ✭✭✭Chris_533976


    Everyone saw that useless (and wrong) Connaught paper article on the N18 (which we can only read half of) and jumped on the bandwagon saying the N18 was shelved. Incidentally it doesnt say anywhere on that page that its shelved.

    Its wrong because it said the N18 was supposed to start in Spring 2008. That USED to be the case, but six months ago the NRA told me it was going to start Q4 2008. 2 weeks ago they told me it would be December/January. Now granted, that was told to me before the article in this thread.

    Of course it has no money allocated, as the main contracts havent been signed. Both projects are mostly fenced on the ground and archaeology is done. They cant do site clearance until later this year due to nesting birds.

    Until I hear from a more reputable source its still going ahead, as far as I'm concerned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    It is going ahead, but its unlikely that the state have the money to pay for it. Hence the PPP angle in the story. So technically it has been shelved in terms of the exchequer funding it. Thats alarming enough to justify the reaction here.

    The N18 is far far far more important than the WRC. So the road bias doesn't seem to exist in the west of Ireland. I bet that pleases some.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭1huge1


    DWCommuter wrote: »
    It is going ahead, but its unlikely that the state have the money to pay for it. Hence the PPP angle in the story. So technically it has been shelved in terms of the exchequer funding it. Thats alarming enough to justify the reaction here.

    The N18 is far far far more important than the WRC. So the road bias doesn't seem to exist in the west of Ireland. I bet that pleases some.:D
    Well as much as it pains me to say this, I'd rather pay a toll than not have the road there at all... so many tolls going up in this country lately though


  • Advertisement
Advertisement