Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

iMac G3 400MHz - OSX????

  • 04-04-2008 3:03pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭


    I know this might be a big negative but is it possible to load a early version of OSX onto an old PowerPC G3 400Mhz iMac that is currently running OS9.1.1. :p
    If so would it be stable and what would the minimum requirements for RAM etc. Indeed what are the max RAM those iMacs can take? :confused:

    as always, any and all help appreciated! :D
    scobius


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 549 ✭✭✭WUSBDesign


    Have a go at www.everymac.com . The answers will come faster than the questions you ask :D .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    This will work, but you do need at least 512 MB of RAM, and preferably the max possible (two slots, total possible 1GB fitted as 2 x 512 MB).

    I have put 10.4.11 on to these machines with 640 MB RAM fitted - it's not a fast experience, but it does work, and is stable.

    I presume that you are only looking at using the machine for email, surfing, and basic office functions such as word-processing and spreadsheets - trying to run processor-intensive apps like Photoshop or Garageband will not be a nice experience ;)

    I would recommend doing a clean install though - I firstly did an upgrade of whatever version of OS X was one the machines (10.1.x, I think), so I could leave Mac 9.2 in place, but it didn't work very well. When I re-installed using the "Clean Install" option, it was noticeably quicker.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    I had 10.3.9 working fine on two G3 300MHz Towers, a blue & white and a beige.
    Slow but stable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭nialler


    As rebel said, I've had 10.1, 10.2 running on an old 233mhz iMac, sloooooowwwww but useable, I wouldn't go any higher than 10.2 as 10.3/10.4 and 10.5 are just to ram hungry.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,693 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    Yeah a G3 400 is plenty for 10.2 at least. Just max out the RAM as already said.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,163 ✭✭✭ZENER


    I've just last week installed Tiger on a 500MHz G3 - 640MB - 20GB - Flower iMac and it was usable - even ran ARD fine. The experience is like Windows XP on a 500MHz Pentium III with 512MB.

    It's being used as a receptionists machine in an art gallery running Apple Works 05 and Adobe CS.

    ZEN


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭nialler


    ZENER wrote: »
    I've just last week installed Tiger on a 500MHz G3 - 640MB - 20GB - Flower iMac and it was usable - even ran ARD fine. The experience is like Windows XP on a 500MHz Pentium III with 512MB.

    It's being used as a receptionists machine in an art gallery running Apple Works 05 and Adobe CS.

    ZEN

    Poor receptionist!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    i have a g4 450 powermac running osx tiger with only 512mb ram, not the fastests but works perfectly as a media server.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Scobius90


    hey everyone,

    thanks a lot everyone for your answers. :D
    I presume that you are only looking at using the machine for email, surfing, and basic office functions such as word-processing and spreadsheets - trying to run processor-intensive apps like Photoshop or Garageband will not be a nice experience

    yeah exactly TYPE 17, i just want to give my wife the experience of using the newer Apple OS's as we are thinking of moving from Windows to Apple. And as I have an old imac sitting behind me at work from my post-grad days I thought it could be a cheap and easy way to do this :D before we outlay a load of yoyos.

    now to get my hands on some RAM ........ :p

    thanks again everyone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Scobius90 wrote: »
    ...i just want to give my wife the experience of using the newer Apple OS's as we are thinking of moving from Windows to Apple. And as I have an old imac sitting behind me at work from my post-grad days I thought it could be a cheap and easy way to do this...


    now to get my hands on some RAM

    From previous experience ;) , I can say to you: remember to emphasise that the machine is a little old and slow, and that it is the interface that she should be deciding whether or not she likes - basically you need to remind her not to associate this machine's speed with the Mac OS in general.

    For RAM, I recommend www.crucial.com after using them on the recommendation of others here - easy-to-check configuration on their site, best price, and really fast delivery.

    According to them, your iMac G3 400 MHz can take up to two of these:

    512MB, 168-pin DIMM, SDRAM, PC133 memory module
    Item No. CT223785

    each: €58.74 inc vat, plus shipping


  • Advertisement
Advertisement