Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Being Promiscuous with WPA

  • 31-03-2008 1:00pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭


    Having an issue getting Promiscuous mode to be promiscuous on a WPA-PSK network. I can get this working fine in unencrypted network and i can get this working in a roundabout way on a wep network(monitor mode + wireshark).

    Monitor mode also would be usefully (a little less) but the same issue exists.

    My setup is atheros card with madwifi-ng drivers.

    -Do i need to patch wpa-supplicent to do this?
    -Is there any version of wireshark that can decode these?
    -Has anyone had this issue and solved it?


    The only workaround i have is a MITM attack but this is noisy/messy and causes lots of issues i dont want.

    ogh an yes this is my network.


Comments

  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,921 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    Having an issue getting Promiscuous mode to be promiscuous on a WPA-PSK network. I can get this working fine in unencrypted network and i can get this working in a roundabout way on a wep network(monitor mode + wireshark).

    Monitor mode also would be usefully (a little less) but the same issue exists.

    My setup is atheros card with madwifi-ng drivers.

    -Do i need to patch wpa-supplicent to do this?
    -Is there any version of wireshark that can decode these?
    -Has anyone had this issue and solved it?


    The only workaround i have is a MITM attack but this is noisy/messy and causes lots of issues i dont want.

    ogh an yes this is my network.

    What about using a more dedicated tool such as airodump, it seems to happily get WPA packets for me, though I'm not using madwifi-ng drivers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭JimmyCrackCorn!


    I was using wireshark while associated to the network. With what you have already said i have an idea.

    I went digging on airodump-ng and some of the information there might help me out. http://www.aircrack-ng.org/doku.php?id=airodump-ng
    (network manager may have been reconfiguring the card as i never killed the dispatcher):o

    old but worth digging further
    http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/2006-November/016387.html


    after more digging i may have more issues. Each client may get its own key so i may not be able to do this while associated.


    Will post back if this works out or not.


    Thanks again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭Martyr


    if you're a windows user with some spare cash, perhaps you should invest in the AIRPCAP adapter.

    Its specially designed to work with wireshark.
    It also runs with Cain & Abel / Aircrack..etc for monitoring 802.11b/g networks.
    different versions allow transmission at an extra cost.

    the alternative is linux based.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭JimmyCrackCorn!


    Am using linux.;)

    Still working on it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭JimmyCrackCorn!


    got this working with airodump.

    Cant do it while associated as far as i can tell without a second wireless card.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,921 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    got this working with airodump.

    Cant do it while associated as far as i can tell without a second wireless card.

    There's a compeltely new 802.11 stack with the 2.6.24 kernel which may help.


Advertisement