Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Diesel Cayenne

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,545 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    VW make a better fist of the styling IMO


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭Jimbo


    I can never understand, if you were spending that much on a car, why would you want a diesel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,545 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    resale value, running costs, that said, a diesel Porsche proves how they're diluting the brand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,726 ✭✭✭maidhc


    A diesel porsche suv. :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    jimbo78 wrote: »
    I can never understand, if you were spending that much on a car, why would you want a diesel?

    Diesel is hardly a sign of poverty. Edit - to clarify my point, sometimes a diesel engine is actually one of the more desirable in the model range - for instance the BMW 535d.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭niceirishfella


    eoin_s wrote: »
    Diesel is hardly a sign of poverty.

    +1

    Not with Diesel @ €1.30ish a litre nowadays!:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,482 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    This is what happens when accountants start running things. Pointless venture. What next, a Lambo MPV?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    It's the Porsche Cayenne though - they have hardly ruined a masterpiece.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    maidhc wrote: »
    A diesel porsche suv. :mad:

    +1

    I was horrified when Porsche launched the Cayenne. But now they're fitting a cheap Volkswagen diesel engine in it as well? :mad:

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭niceirishfella


    The only decent 4x4 diesel development as of late is the Subaru Forester Boxer Diesel.

    The Porche Diesel idea just don't tug my rug at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,482 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    I can see footballers and their WAGs queuing up at dealerships for this car.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭testicle


    bazz26 wrote: »
    What next, a Lambo MPV?

    lm002.jpg

    lamborghini_r3-95.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,482 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    At least the tractor has a purpose. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,402 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    LOL, the LM002 had a timing problem. Had it been launched in Dublin only in 2006 (instead of a global launch in 1986) with a retail price of €200k (in girls' money about 5 posh hand bags) in Brown Thomas, it would have been a major marketing success :D

    Lotus Elan turbo for sale:

    https://www.adverts.ie/vehicles/lotus-elan-turbo/35456469

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Only thing I liked about the Cayenne was the headlights that looked around corners for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,698 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    stevec wrote: »
    Only thing I liked about the Cayenne was the headlights that looked around corners for you.

    My younger brothers Bravo has that. I really don't see the point of the Cayenne, petrol or deisel...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,749 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    resale value, running costs, that said, a diesel Porsche proves how they're diluting the brand.

    or, if they don't do a diesel, there won't be a brand to dilute. More in their line to make the flat 6 a diesel.

    At least then the oil leak will be unexpected :rolleyes: !

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    Makes me laugh, most of ye thought that a diesel R8 was a good idea, but when a Porsche badge is applied it "dilutes the Porsche brand".

    What's wrong with a diesel Cayenne? Don't anyone say that the Cayenne is a proper Porsche, a proper Porsche is a sports car, not an SUV anyway. They diluted the Porsche brand by building a yummy mummy's car, not by putting a diesel into a yummy mummys car. The damage was done years ago when Porsche decided to build a Cayenne in the first place.

    Why is diesel a great idea in a supercar, but not in a 4X4? I always thought it would be the other way around, no:confused:? Diesel is best suited to working vehicles, not in thrill machines like a supercar. That was why Rudolf Diesel invented the engine named in his honour for in the first place.

    As an aside, Audi aren't bothering with the hybrid Q7 after all, "the numbers don't add up" apparently. They're sticking with diesel instead for the US.

    Wonder how this will affect the Cayenne hybrid?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,726 ✭✭✭maidhc


    E92 wrote: »
    Why is diesel a great idea in a supercar, but not in a 4X4? I always thought it would be the other way around, no:confused:? Diesel is best suited to working vehicles, not in thrill machines like a supercar. That was why Rudolf Diesel invented the engine named in his honour for in the first place.

    a) Audi are well known for their TDI engines and they do not really make sportscars a la Porsche
    b) Building a sportscar with a high performance diesel can only strengthen their brand, especially in the US where "TDI" is a brand in its own right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭Blue850


    Porsche Diesel MPV :D
    112_0605_HB_concours_29z+porsche_tractor+front_view.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,726 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Blue850 wrote: »
    Porsche Diesel MPV :D

    At least they are not putting a single cylinder semi diesel engine into the Cayenne!

    Don't think Porsche ever made the tractor for any longer than a few years post WWII., the name was licenced out for most of the production. They were quite common in Ireland though.

    Stunning looking tractor for the period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,924 ✭✭✭blackbox


    E92 wrote: »
    The damage was done years ago when Porsche decided to build a Cayenne in the first place.

    +1

    ...made even worse by that ugliness!


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭kikel


    Their is more to Porsche than a 911. Why can't they diversify into different markets and have a diesel engine. So went the world oil supplies run out you wouldn't want Porsche to try something new. The Panamera is coming out soon and i bet that will come in for the same criticism. It's not a real Porsche. A Porsche shouldn't have 4 doors. Blah, blah blah.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    kikel wrote: »
    So went the world oil supplies run out you wouldn't want Porsche to try something new.
    How about this for a crazy idea - lightweight sports cars?


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭kikel


    And ye are all offended by the Cayenne. Wait till ya see whats to come

    :p:D

    fiat_500_posche_01.jpg

    fiat_500_posche_02.jpg

    PS I know these pictures are not of any real porsche


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    Anan1 wrote: »
    How about this for a crazy idea - lightweight sports cars?
    +1.

    With a diesel Cayenne, Porsche have come up with the automotive equivalent of an Irish solution to an Irish problem.

    They should bin the Cayenne if they're that concerned about their carbon footprint, and put BMW EfficientDynamics technologies into their sports cars, which can cut CO2 emissions by up to 23%, and make proper Porsches lighter, which would get down the CO2 even more, instead of this 4X4 rubbish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,321 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The Cayenne earns porsche enough money to spend on R&D for their sports cars. No Cayenne, no sports cars :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭WHITE_P


    My point was that VW already build this car only better looking, with a decent choice of Diesel engines.

    As Clarkeson says in Top Gear of the V10 TDI: What an engine.

    It is interesting though that the Cayenne is the main earner for Porsche.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭niceirishfella


    WHITE_P wrote: »

    It is interesting though that the Cayenne is the main earner for Porsche.


    well, as they say - FOOLS AND THEIR MONEY.......:p


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭WHITE_P


    well, as they say - FOOLS AND THEIR MONEY.......:p

    Too True:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    hold on a minute - Imagine you want an exclusive high end SUV that handles well but doesn't cost an absolute fortune to run - remember the 4.5 V8 and Turbo Cayenne drink petrol like its going out of fashion and the 3.2 is underpowered (imo) - Remember if you will the TG report of the V10 Touareg said that engine made it handle poorly - so then what choice do you have, the RR Sport?
    Obviously that car is selling well - so why wouldn't Porsche make a diesel version?

    Believe me with that v10 on board the Cayenne diesel will not be short on thrills.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭niceirishfella


    RobAMerc wrote: »

    Believe me with that v10 on board the Cayenne diesel will not be short on thrills.

    ...........Or ejits to buy them!:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭WHITE_P


    RobAMerc wrote: »
    Remember if you will the TG report of the V10 Touareg said that engine made it handle poorly.

    Believe me with that v10 on board the Cayenne diesel will not be short on thrills.

    So do you think the V10 TDI Cayenne, if they use that engine (its not mentioned in the report, a 3.2 V6 or the new Audi V12 are mentioned), will handle any better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭WHITE_P


    E 92: Why is diesel a great idea in a supercar, but not in a 4X4? I always thought it would be the other way around, no:confused:? Diesel is best suited to working vehicles, not in thrill machines like a supercar.
    As an aside, Audi aren't bothering with the hybrid Q7 after all, "the numbers don't add up" apparently. They're sticking with diesel instead for the US.


    Never said that putting diesel into a super car was a great idea, althought I can't see any issue with it either, as to some it could be seen as an advancement, particularly as the diesel engine seems to have advanced a lot more in recent years than the petrol engine has.

    I just don't and never could see the point in the Cayenne from the start, given that it is such an ugly looking car, when compared to the VW Touareg which it has so much in common with.

    I think you should have a good read of the article on the following link, as I seem to remember you posting on another tread that Diesel is just a Fad.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_engine

    Must you mention BMW and their bag of tricks in almost every post you make.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,749 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    WHITE_P wrote: »
    E 92: Must you mention BMW and their bag of tricks in almost every post you make.


    I'm afraid he does - he's on a %%, dontchaknow ;);):):)

    Oh, and like BMW would sell one of their engines to their leading competitors on the class (X5 vs Cayenne..) - never happen.

    Oh, and Otto Diesel invented the diesel to.............get around the petrol patent.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,749 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    :D
    E92 wrote: »
    Why is diesel a great idea in a supercar, but not in a 4X4? I always thought it would be the other way around, no:confused:? Diesel is best suited to working vehicles, not in thrill machines like a supercar.

    did you write that the right way round??

    Anyhoo, you're forgetting the reason sportscars were invented in the first place -to win races. Audi have walked on everyone for the last X years with a diesel, and to ignore that fact is just plain daft. And the reason all those sports and F1 cars went away from clutches and gearlevers, and previous to that, non-syncromesh and double-declutching, is not for some esoteric thrill reason - it's because something better/faster/more effective came along.

    Right now, the TDI is that Next Best Thing.:D :D

    Wait 'til they do the diesel-hybrid - then you'll be really upset !!

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    WHITE_P wrote: »
    I just don't and never could see the point in the Cayenne from the start, given that it is such an ugly looking car, when compared to the VW Touareg which it has so much in common with.

    As do I.
    WHITE_P wrote: »
    I think you should have a good read of the article on the following link, as I seem to remember you posting on another tread that Diesel is just a Fad.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_engine


    Diesel is still a fad, nothing has changed since that discussion in that thread. This engine which runs on petrol by the way has the advantages of both engines. And because that means diesel economy, you're getting 11% less CO2 in the process(because burning diesel produces 13% more CO2 than the same quantity of burning petrol). There's no smelly particulates, oodles of Nitrous Oxide, no super expensive diesel technology and no complications like AdBlue which all the German car makers will be using in the coming years.
    WHITE_P wrote: »
    Must you mention BMW and their bag of tricks in almost every post you make.

    Here's why I do:
    galwaytt wrote: »
    he's on a %%, dontchaknow
    Happy:p?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,749 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    Ah yes, but Diesel is cheaper to produce in a refinery than petrol.

    Not that you'd notice at the pumps lately, LOL .........:rolleyes:

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    WHITE_P wrote: »
    So do you think the V10 TDI Cayenne, if they use that engine (its not mentioned in the report, a 3.2 V6 or the new Audi V12 are mentioned), will handle any better.

    sorry I dont get what your saying ? Is it that the V10 would automatically make the Cayenne handle badly ?
    One presumes if Porsche did use it they would set the Cayenne up correctly to account for the mass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,726 ✭✭✭maidhc


    E92 wrote: »
    Diesel is still a fad, nothing has changed since that discussion in that thread. This engine which runs on petrol by the way has the advantages of both engines. And because that means diesel economy, you're getting 11% less CO2 in the process(because burning diesel produces 13% more CO2 than the same quantity of burning petrol). There's no smelly particulates, oodles of Nitrous Oxide, no super expensive diesel technology and no complications like AdBlue which all the German car makers will be using in the coming years.

    IC engines are as much a fad as diesel engines are! The very nature of a reciprocating piston engine is not an ideal engineering solution. Diesel engines are not an ideal solution, and burning non renewable fuel is not an ideal solution.

    Given the technology which does exist, diesel is currently the way forward for 90% of cars. They burn less of a scarse resource, and reduce the chances insofar as technically possible of climate change etc. Diesel engines are the best solution currently available, because they are not perfect does not mean they are a "fad".

    If or when "Diesotto" engines prove viable, maybe that will be the way to go, but as of now, they do not, and hence we can safely say for at least the next 5 years diesel is the only way to go in the vast majority of cars.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭WHITE_P


    RobAMerc wrote: »
    sorry I dont get what your saying ? Is it that the V10 would automatically make the Cayenne handle badly ?
    One presumes if Porsche did use it they would set the Cayenne up correctly to account for the mass.

    If I read what you are saying correctly, VW didn't setup the Touareg properly in the first place, or Porsche will do a better job reworking what already exists.


Advertisement