Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NTL ping times

  • 21-03-2008 2:31pm
    #1
    silvine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,132 ✭✭✭


    What kind of ping time should I expect on a 3mb NTL connection? How does this look?

    249199088.png


Comments

  • #2
    stanley1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭stanley1


    249205943.png


  • #3
    christophicus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,969 ✭✭✭christophicus


    NTL are still routing through the netherlands so ping will not be the best to some places.

    249214766.png


  • #4
    silvine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,132 ✭✭✭silvine


    What's a good ping time?


  • #5
    Moriarty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    christophicus wrote: »
    NTL are still routing through the netherlands so ping will not be the best to some places.

    They're also routing through INEX. In any case, it doesn't make much of a difference to latency. I still get <40msec pings to the uk internet for instance.

    On the 6mbit/512kbit package..
    249247350.png

    A "good" ping time is relative silvine - for FPS games (probably the most latency-sensitive thing you'll be doing) anything below 40-50ms is perfect.


  • #6
    Freddie59
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Moriarty wrote: »
    anything below 40-50ms is perfect.

    Kinda says it all.:)


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    bricks
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭bricks


    Pinging www.boards.ie [89.234.66.107] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=185ms TTL=59
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=59
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=59
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=59

    Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 149ms, Maximum = 219ms, Average = 186ms

    Wonderful isn't it!, and this is offpeak. I get packet loss and 300-400ms during peak hours.


  • #8
    AntiVirus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭AntiVirus


    My pings to boards.ie looks good.
    Pinging boards.ie [89.234.66.107] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=59
Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=59
Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=59
Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0&#37; loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 9ms

    Running a trace route show I'm being routed through dublin. :)
    Tracing route to www.boards.ie [89.234.66.107]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     6 ms     5 ms     6 ms  10.91.128.1
  2    12 ms     6 ms     7 ms  089-101-162177.ntlworld.ie [89.101.162.177]
  3     6 ms     7 ms     6 ms  213.46.165.81
  4     8 ms     6 ms     7 ms  to-inex-dub-deg-gw.digiweb.ie [193.242.111.20]
  5     8 ms     9 ms     9 ms  89.234.66.107

Trace complete.


  • #9
    Snaga
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭Snaga


    Erm.

    Your supposed to x-out your ip address - not the ip address of boards.ie :)


  • #10
    AntiVirus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭AntiVirus


    Me be stupid :o


  • #11
    silvine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,132 ✭✭✭silvine


    So if upgrade to a 6mb NTL package I should see my ping time decrease?


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    Clover
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭Clover


    silvine wrote: »
    So if upgrade to a 6mb NTL package I should see my ping time decrease?


    don't count on it , i have the 6 meg ntl package and the ping time can go from low 20 ms to high 80 ms ping times on the speed test.

    pings to boards are good though:

    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
    (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

    C:\Documents and Settings\Matt>ping www.boards.ie -n 32

    Pinging www.boards.ie [89.234.66.107] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
    Packets: Sent = 32, Received = 32, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 15ms

    C:\Documents and Settings\Matt>


  • #13
    silvine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,132 ✭✭✭silvine


    Why is the upload speed not more important when it comes to gaming online? Surely the faster the speed my computer uploads information to the server I am playing on will benefit me? i.e. my response time will be quicker


  • #14
    Praetorian
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,717 ✭✭✭Praetorian


    I'm surprised to see even a hint of an erratic ping from NTL. Seems like DSL ping times are a bit more reliable. Here is mine =

    ping www.boards.ie -t

    Pinging www.boards.ie [89.234.66.107] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
    Packets: Sent = 14, Received = 14, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms
    Control-C
    ^C
    C:\Users\Damien>


  • #15
    bricks
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭bricks


    Tracing route to www.boards.ie [89.234.66.107]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 181 ms 159 ms 148 ms 10.92.0.1
    2 194 ms 188 ms 172 ms 089-101-162065.ntlworld.ie [89.101.162.65]
    3 225 ms 212 ms 223 ms 213.46.165.73
    4 241 ms 220 ms 331 ms 213.46.165.62
    5 228 ms 228 ms 199 ms to-inex-dub-deg-gw.digiweb.ie [193.242.111.20]
    6 198 ms 162 ms 147 ms 89.234.66.107

    Trace complete.


  • #16
    Clover
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭Clover


    Praetorian wrote: »
    I'm surprised to see even a hint of an erratic ping from NTL. Seems like DSL ping times are a bit more reliable. Here is mine

    the DSL pings seem more consistent , below is my 3 meg BT DSL line stats :

    Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
    Packets: Sent = 14, Received = 14, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 12ms


Advertisement