Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Euthyphro Dilemma

  • 19-02-2008 2:24pm
    #1
    Pompey Magnus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭


    The Euthyphro Dilemma was raised by Plato in c375 BC, in his dialogue "Euthyphro" the character of Socrates (Plato's mouthpiece in his dialogues) asks Euthphro "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?". Since it was first asked it has caused a problem for believers to justify the idea of divine command and the legitimacy of the Bible as a moral code.

    If the believer answers that good acts are good because God says so it means that adherents to these rules are blindly following an arbitrary authority. Things could have easily been different, for example God could have chosen that murder be good and it would have been absolutely moral to kill and to not kill would have been morally repugnant, it may seem strange but this argument claims that as God is the source of morality then murder in itself is not bad, it just was not chosen by God.

    On the other hand if the believer answers that God commands us to act good because these are good acts in themselves, this means that good acts are independent of God and God and the Bible becomes optional in the equation.

    The Euthyphro Dilemma poses a very tough question for the believer, is God arbitrary or irrelevant? Some believers go for the first option but say that God would never create a universe in which murder was moral, however this argument is self defeating as it is actually the second point in disguise, it assumes murdering to be a unalterably immoral and therefore again God becomes optional.

    Has there ever been a satisfactory religious solution to the dilemma? I know many have tried and many have failed.


Advertisement