Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

12 x 12 RSJ

  • 23-01-2008 7:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭


    Hi,
    I am full of questions.
    I had to purchase a 12 x 12 inch rsj to span an opening of 3.4 metres leading into a sunroom so the total length was 4m.
    It will be placed 10 courses high, at the 13th course will be 8 inch hollowcore spanning horizontally over steel at a span of 4.5m.
    Is 300mm(1foot) on both sides of rsj adequate to sit on external blockwork, the weight of this rsj is extreme.
    Your thoughts!
    Thanks,
    Peter


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭archtech


    300mm of bearing either side should be ok however, you should rest the rsj on a padstone rather than bearing the rsj on standard blockwork.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    this is a question you should be asking your engineer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭pete6296


    Thanks archtech, where would i source a padstone and what size should i put in.
    Thanks,
    Pete


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭pete6296


    I was interested to see the opinion of other people, the engineer recommended 300mm but i thought it was a little skimpy.
    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭archtech


    Your engineer would be specifying the minimum size required. Depending on if your casting one or buying one it may be more cost efficient to use a large one.

    Might be worth your while contacting some suppliers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,234 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    archtech wrote: »
    Your engineer would be specifying the minimum size required. Depending on if your casting one or buying one it may be more cost efficient to use a large one.

    Might be worth your while contacting some suppliers.
    How exactly would be be cost efficient to use a larger one?
    Surely the price is related to the size for standard padstones.


    To the OP, if the engineer says 300, then 300 is fine. This is standard enough for domestic loading. But a padstone is a must.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭archtech


    Mellor wrote: »
    How exactly would be be cost efficient to use a larger one?
    Surely the price is related to the size for standard padstones.


    To the OP, if the engineer says 300, then 300 is fine. This is standard enough for domestic loading. But a padstone is a must.

    The engineer has specified a 300 however the shortest available from the supplier in the link is 450. My point is it may cost less for the op to buy the 450 one rather than insisting of getting a 300 specially made just because his engineer specified a 300.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭gally74


    look im a mechanical engineer myself

    if you go 450 mm how are you going to cover it up,

    at 300 a normal 100, 100 cav, 100 block will be as wide.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,234 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    archtech wrote: »
    The engineer has specified a 300 however the shortest available from the supplier in the link is 450. My point is it may cost less for the op to buy the 450 one rather than insisting of getting a 300 specially made just because his engineer specified a 300.
    Check the link again. The last one is a 300mm padstone. this is a standard size.
    gally74 wrote: »
    look im a mechanical engineer myself
    if you go 450 mm how are you going to cover it up,
    at 300 a normal 100, 100 cav, 100 block will be as wide.
    Em, The stone goes the other way. 450 is the lenght (or 900, or 300 as specified here),
    215 wide on a 215 wall, or 300 on a wider wall. 300 cavity walls are not built internally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭pete6296


    Hi,
    This steel is on an external wall, 300mm in thickness in total.
    Pete


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,234 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    It shouldn't be on the external wall. Well specifically on the external leaf.
    So depending on the junction you should either build a stub wall inside the external wall to hold it, or continue the 300 wall inside. I was continuing the 300 wall inside, i'd make it solid not cavity.

    The exact way to do it depends on the shape and direction of the junction, engineer should provide a detail.


Advertisement