Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

which is better ?

  • 21-01-2008 12:08am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭


    hi, i am going to buy a wild angle lens for my pentax k10d, after 2 days research on net, there are 2 lens i prefer to buy, but i need more advise.
    personally i shot i lot of landscapes and portrait, and i already have a 18-55mm, 50-200mm.

    first one is: Pentax smc P-DA 12-24mm F4.0 ED/AL [costs about 580 euro]
    second one is: Pentax SMC DA* 16-50mm f:2.8 ED AL IF SDM Lens [550 euro]


    thx for you help ;):D


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,699 ✭✭✭ThOnda


    I will buy the 16-50 because I don't have wider lens. You have already similar one, so go WIDER :-)

    It's easy... unless you need less wide, but with smaller aperture. Or bigger? I don't know. Just with the bigger hole :-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 465 ✭✭snellers


    12-24mm IMO if you are into Lanscape shots....I love the 12-24 on my Nikon - the extra 6mm will make a huge amount of difference to you

    best of luck in whatever you decide upon!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,265 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    12mm for sure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭whufee


    ThOnda wrote: »
    I will buy the 16-50 because I don't have wider lens. You have already similar one, so go WIDER :-)

    It's easy... unless you need less wide, but with smaller aperture. Or bigger? I don't know. Just with the bigger hole :-)

    so, is there a big difference between F2.8 or F4 ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    I don't own either lenses but speaking from my knowledge of aperture and focal lengths I'd guess that with a wide angle lens there wouldn't be too much depth of field difference between the two (nearly everything is in focus at wide angles)

    But there may be a shutter speed difference (important in lower light situations to prevent image blur and also if you want to "stop" a subject that is in motion).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 465 ✭✭snellers


    F2.8 really comes into its own in low light conditions (in a nutshell it means you can handhold the camera and still take pics at a fast enough shutter speed to take sharp pics without any blur)- you mentioned that landscape and portraiture are your main interest.....landscape shots typically are made on a tripod with a wider aperture
    to enable larger depth of field so you are ok there,as for portraiture unless you shoot a lot of candid stuff, lighting can be controlled by yourself thus negating the absolute need for a faster lens

    thats not of course to say all lens' are equal and aperture is the only consideration....but this is another huge topic which their are many discussions about here on boards and across the internet over which lens is best and why!

    as a general rule of thumb a lens with a constant aperture of 2.8 or better
    e.g. Nikon 70 - 200mm F2.8 - tends to be a higher specification model with improved glass (thus improving the overall image quality) and build - a 'pro' lens (and also a hell of a lot more expensive!) -


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    but he's looking at wideangles... using the reciprocal rule the 12mm (18mm equivalent on 35mm) would only need a 1/15 - 1/30 sec shutter speed to prevent hand shake. 1/15 is a really long shutter speed already.

    But if you're looking at a normal range zoom 18-x mm then f2.8 is the professional grade while the cheaper consumer ones invariably are of the f3.5-f5.6 variety.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,220 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    snellers wrote: »
    landscape shots typically are made on a tripod with a wider aperture to enable larger depth of field so you are ok there,as for portraiture unless you shoot a lot of candid stuff, lighting can be controlled by yourself thus negating the absolute need for a faster lens

    I take it you mean narrow here, not wider.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 349 ✭✭amcinroy


    Another one to consider is the Pentax 14mm DA Prime.

    Somebody could glue this lens on to my camera and I wouldn't mind one bit. It's about as wide as you'd probably want to go for landscapes and the advantage of the prime is the resistance to flare when shooting into the sun

    The 12-24mm zoom is an exceptional lens and the sharpnesss matches the 14mm prime. But you already have 18mm and above covered and would you really miss 2mm on the wide end? The 14mm would probably be wide enough with all the advantages of a prime (smaller, lighter, marginally sharper, better resistance to flare, faster aperture).

    Check out my webpage for loads of examples of shots taken with the 14mm.

    Andy
    www.skyandstone.com


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭whufee


    thank you so much!!!
    but i think, there are few pentax dealers in ireland. two lenses i found are all come from ebay. uk shops have those two lenses but selling approx 750 euro for
    16*50mm F2.5 !!!
    so can anybody tells me an irish pentax seller.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement