Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Animated effects inferior in Leopard?

  • 13-12-2007 3:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭


    This is something I have been noticing since I upgraded to Leopard. Dock magnification the genie effect and expose are all choppier than they were in Tiger while new effects like Spaces and grid stacks also splutter noticeably. My Mac is a 2.16 GHz C2D iMac with 1GB of Ram and a 256mb Radeon X1600 graphics card. At first I thought this might have been caused by upgrading rather then choosing a clean install but apparently many people are noticing this problem even on new machines with Leopard pre-installed. In fact it has been theorised that this might be the reason apple removed live previews in the dock. That Leopard, or more specifically Core Animation, is having some teething problems that is effecting the performance of animated effects.

    Has anyone here experienced this?


Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,693 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I haven't really noticed anything like that with my imac. It's a 2GHz C2D with 2GB RAM. I don't use dock magnification but Expose and Spaces seem fine. More RAM might help, Leopard definitely need more (1GB was barely enough for Tiger imo). Either that or you've got something running in the background that's eating up a lot of CPU.

    OS upgrades gradually become more bloated and resource heavy anyway. Leopard is no different I'm afraid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭babypink


    i've noticed no degradation in performance after moving to leopard. granted i'm not running a shiny intel box, but nevertheless i'm happy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭triple h


    I have a 2GB RAM and i did an upgrade. I have seen no problems, in fact i love leopard.

    People were saying that safari seems slow but i see no diff. in fact the web pages seem crystal clear to look at in leopard to me, but that could be my imagination, don't know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭Gerard_Smith


    Hmm people other than me have complained of this as I say even people with a new Mac with Leopard pre-installed. There seems to be a pretty much 50-50 split between people experiencing it and not. Interestingly there is also a problem reported of images viewed in preview being blurry which I have not experienced at all. I have however noticed previews in iphoto are more blurred than in Tiger. I think there is enough anecdotal evidence that Leopard is having some graphical bugs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Both my Aluminium 2.4GHz iMac and the wife's 2.GHz MacBook (both with 2GB RAM) were slow in the first few days of Leopard use. There was a noticeable increase in instances of the spinning pinwheel for a few seconds when opening apps, docs etc.
    This was after the initial indexing by Spotlight (no dot in the centre of the magnifying glass).
    CPU usage on Menumeters showed no unusual peaks during the pinwheel periods, so it wasn't apparent what was happening.

    However, the good news is that both machines seemed fine after a few days and are now at similar speeds to their Tiger performance.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement