Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most Conservative Equation

  • 25-11-2007 10:04pm
    #1
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Looking for some help.

    I have a list of equations below.

    I'm looking for which is the most conservative and which is the least.

    Set 1
    K0= 1-sinɸ'
    K0= 1-.404 tanɸ'/1+ sinɸ'
    K0= tan(45-ɸ'/2)
    K0= √2-sinɸ'/√2+sinɸ'

    Set 2
    K0= .24+.31log Ip
    K0= .42+.004log Ip

    I havent a clue why one would be conservative and why it wouldnt be.

    Best I can figure you would want Ko with the lowest number as the lower the number the more conservative it is.

    Any one have any ideas? Or suggestions


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭breadmonkey


    What's the context? Is it something to do with soils?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I'm presuming it's to do with hypothesis testing? To lower the alpha value you pick the most conservative test.

    OP?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Yeah its to do with soils. Ko is the cofficeint of earth pressure and ɸ' is the angel of shear resitance.

    Ip is the Plasticity index.

    What I've done is graphed Ko against for differenct values of ɸ' and Ip. The ɸ' graphs are similar to each other as are the Ip graphs. The values arent the same but the apperance is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭breadmonkey


    ehhhhhh.....

    differentiate wrt ɸ', equate to 0, check for max/min and compare the results???


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    ehhhhhh.....

    differentiate wrt ɸ', equate to 0, check for max/min and compare the results???

    Why would you differentiate?

    As far as I can tell thats not the object of the excercise. I think its just a matter of plotting each against each and compairing the results and as I said I think the concervative answer is the smallest one.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,608 ✭✭✭breadmonkey


    kearnsr wrote: »
    Best I can figure you would want Ko with the lowest number as the lower the number the more conservative it is.

    I was going on what you said here. If you want the lowest value of K0 then you can find the value of ɸ' that minimises each function by what I said previously.

    EDIT: Although you'll prbably be given a value of ɸ' to work with so what I said is probably useless inretrospect.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    I was going on what you said here. If you want the lowest value of K0 then you can find the value of ɸ' that minimises each function by what I said previously.

    EDIT: Although you'll prbably be given a value of ɸ' to work with so what I said is probably useless inretrospect.

    Yeah I've been given a range of values for ɸ' to determine Ko


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭chris85


    Ok well this is bit different.

    Ok well my view on being the most conservative would be to go with the equation that yields the highest value of K0. Bear in mind this is from an engineering design point of view. My thinking for suggesting the highest value is below.

    it sounds like ideally you want to keep K0 low compared the angle of shear. The most radical solution will keep this K0 value really low as it does not allow any room for error.
    The conservative solution would then be the highest as this allows for a wide variety of situations.

    Put in other words if you need to budget money for a week and you estimate you will need €80 for grocery shopping. The conservative approach would be to say €90-100 is required in case there are any deviations in prices etc.

    Does that make sense?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    chris85 wrote: »
    Ok well this is bit different.

    Ok well my view on being the most conservative would be to go with the equation that yields the highest value of K0. Bear in mind this is from an engineering design point of view. My thinking for suggesting the highest value is below.

    it sounds like ideally you want to keep K0 low compared the angle of shear. The most radical solution will keep this K0 value really low as it does not allow any room for error.
    The conservative solution would then be the highest as this allows for a wide variety of situations.

    Put in other words if you need to budget money for a week and you estimate you will need €80 for grocery shopping. The conservative approach would be to say €90-100 is required in case there are any deviations in prices etc.

    Does that make sense?

    Thats what I've been thinking. I just need to figure out if Ko should be high or low for desgin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭chris85


    kearnsr wrote: »
    Thats what I've been thinking. I just need to figure out if Ko should be high or low for desgin.

    Yeah know what you mean kearnsr.

    is it possible to explain the problem more just to get a broader look at the problem.

    I think it all depends on what way the problem needs to approached


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    KThink the most conservative approach would be that which gives you the highest value of horizontal effective stress, say if you were designing a retaining wall for example, (However usually for design we used the active earth co-efficient, ka = (1-sinΦ/1+sinΦ). Of the 3 equations I looked at onmy spreadsheet Tan(45 -Φ/2) gave highest values, therefore most conservative of those.

    So I'm going with the higher the value of Ko the more conservative it is at it gives a higher effective stress


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭chris85


    kearnsr wrote: »
    KThink the most conservative approach would be that which gives you the highest value of horizontal effective stress, say if you were designing a retaining wall for example, (However usually for design we used the active earth co-efficient, ka = (1-sinΦ/1+sinΦ). Of the 3 equations I looked at onmy spreadsheet Tan(45 -Φ/2) gave highest values, therefore most conservative of those.

    So I'm going with the higher the value of Ko the more conservative it is at it gives a higher effective stress

    Easiest way to do it would be to put each of the equations on a spreadsheet and input a range of values for angle of shear. Graph the results and will give you a good idea what you are looking at.


Advertisement